Loading…
Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia
In Ethiopia, women's access to higher education is a priority for many higher education leaders. Moreover, education access and participation are often measured quantitatively through enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Often overlooked, however, are qualitative outcomes related to gen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cogent education 2023-12, Vol.10 (2) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-28c49dc06595d3bad320a505636332bdf785ec5d40d417858d303636e3ea83273 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Cogent education |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Halkiyo, Atota B. Hailu, Meseret F. Lott, Breanne E. |
description | In Ethiopia, women's access to higher education is a priority for many higher education leaders. Moreover, education access and participation are often measured quantitatively through enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Often overlooked, however, are qualitative outcomes related to gender. To address this gap in the literature, we explore faculty perspectives on gender inequities in Ethiopian higher education by describing specific challenges to gender-equitable pedagogy and reporting participant-generated recommendations. We used an equity pedagogy framework and thematic analysis to examine qualitative data from interviews with 32 university faculty. We found that participants conflated equality with equity, and thus justified the use of a uniform pedagogy for all students. Barriers to gender equitable pedagogy included: pervasive gender stereotypes, curricula and learning environments centered on male learners, and the perception of "gender issues" as ancillary In relation to this last finding, faculty often viewed "gender issues" as political, societal, or outside the realm of their teaching responsibilities. Based on these findings, we discuss how gender inequity in Ethiopian higher education is systemic and should be approached as such. We conclude the paper with participant-generated recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2249668 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2023_2249668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_87d4da192efc4d3492be6d0108921460</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2902247210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-28c49dc06595d3bad320a505636332bdf785ec5d40d417858d303636e3ea83273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBUvsThAXPW_O16caTUmotVLwoeAvTJFtTtpttslX335u1VTx5mmHemzfDe0lyidEYowJdE0oxLvjrmCBCx4QwwXlxkgz6edYDp3_682QUwgYhhCnLUY4HyePc1Nr4bAXB6LQxGtZubRVUqa3Nbm_b7iadfTaV87ZepyWofdV2kedDY1Rr302IxHTWvlnXWLhIzkqoghkd6zB5uZ89Tx-y5dN8Mb1bZooK0WakUExohXguck1XoClBEP_hlFNKVrqcFLlRuWZIMxz7QlMUIW6ogYKSCR0mi4OudrCRjbdb8J10YOX3wPm1BN9aVRlZTDTTgAUxpWKaMkFWhmsUvRMEM46i1tVBq_FutzehlRu393V8XxKBoqETgntWfmAp70Lwpvy9ipHsg5A_Qcg-CHkMIu7dHvZsXTq_hQ_nKy1b6KKjpYda2SDp_xJfpTGN0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902247210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Halkiyo, Atota B. ; Hailu, Meseret F. ; Lott, Breanne E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halkiyo, Atota B. ; Hailu, Meseret F. ; Lott, Breanne E.</creatorcontrib><description>In Ethiopia, women's access to higher education is a priority for many higher education leaders. Moreover, education access and participation are often measured quantitatively through enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Often overlooked, however, are qualitative outcomes related to gender. To address this gap in the literature, we explore faculty perspectives on gender inequities in Ethiopian higher education by describing specific challenges to gender-equitable pedagogy and reporting participant-generated recommendations. We used an equity pedagogy framework and thematic analysis to examine qualitative data from interviews with 32 university faculty. We found that participants conflated equality with equity, and thus justified the use of a uniform pedagogy for all students. Barriers to gender equitable pedagogy included: pervasive gender stereotypes, curricula and learning environments centered on male learners, and the perception of "gender issues" as ancillary In relation to this last finding, faculty often viewed "gender issues" as political, societal, or outside the realm of their teaching responsibilities. Based on these findings, we discuss how gender inequity in Ethiopian higher education is systemic and should be approached as such. We conclude the paper with participant-generated recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-186X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-186X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2249668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>Access to Education ; College Faculty ; Ethiopia ; faculty ; Gender ; gender equity ; Gender Issues ; Graduation Rate ; Higher education ; Pedagogy ; Sex Stereotypes ; sub-Saharan Africa</subject><ispartof>Cogent education, 2023-12, Vol.10 (2)</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-28c49dc06595d3bad320a505636332bdf785ec5d40d417858d303636e3ea83273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9483-0117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2249668$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902247210?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21376,21392,25751,27500,27922,27923,33609,33875,37010,43731,43878,44588,59141,59142</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halkiyo, Atota B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailu, Meseret F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Breanne E.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia</title><title>Cogent education</title><description>In Ethiopia, women's access to higher education is a priority for many higher education leaders. Moreover, education access and participation are often measured quantitatively through enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Often overlooked, however, are qualitative outcomes related to gender. To address this gap in the literature, we explore faculty perspectives on gender inequities in Ethiopian higher education by describing specific challenges to gender-equitable pedagogy and reporting participant-generated recommendations. We used an equity pedagogy framework and thematic analysis to examine qualitative data from interviews with 32 university faculty. We found that participants conflated equality with equity, and thus justified the use of a uniform pedagogy for all students. Barriers to gender equitable pedagogy included: pervasive gender stereotypes, curricula and learning environments centered on male learners, and the perception of "gender issues" as ancillary In relation to this last finding, faculty often viewed "gender issues" as political, societal, or outside the realm of their teaching responsibilities. Based on these findings, we discuss how gender inequity in Ethiopian higher education is systemic and should be approached as such. We conclude the paper with participant-generated recommendations.</description><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>faculty</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>gender equity</subject><subject>Gender Issues</subject><subject>Graduation Rate</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>sub-Saharan Africa</subject><issn>2331-186X</issn><issn>2331-186X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBUvsThAXPW_O16caTUmotVLwoeAvTJFtTtpttslX335u1VTx5mmHemzfDe0lyidEYowJdE0oxLvjrmCBCx4QwwXlxkgz6edYDp3_682QUwgYhhCnLUY4HyePc1Nr4bAXB6LQxGtZubRVUqa3Nbm_b7iadfTaV87ZepyWofdV2kedDY1Rr302IxHTWvlnXWLhIzkqoghkd6zB5uZ89Tx-y5dN8Mb1bZooK0WakUExohXguck1XoClBEP_hlFNKVrqcFLlRuWZIMxz7QlMUIW6ogYKSCR0mi4OudrCRjbdb8J10YOX3wPm1BN9aVRlZTDTTgAUxpWKaMkFWhmsUvRMEM46i1tVBq_FutzehlRu393V8XxKBoqETgntWfmAp70Lwpvy9ipHsg5A_Qcg-CHkMIu7dHvZsXTq_hQ_nKy1b6KKjpYda2SDp_xJfpTGN0g</recordid><startdate>20231211</startdate><enddate>20231211</enddate><creator>Halkiyo, Atota B.</creator><creator>Hailu, Meseret F.</creator><creator>Lott, Breanne E.</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-0117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231211</creationdate><title>Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia</title><author>Halkiyo, Atota B. ; Hailu, Meseret F. ; Lott, Breanne E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-28c49dc06595d3bad320a505636332bdf785ec5d40d417858d303636e3ea83273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>faculty</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>gender equity</topic><topic>Gender Issues</topic><topic>Graduation Rate</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>sub-Saharan Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halkiyo, Atota B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailu, Meseret F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Breanne E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halkiyo, Atota B.</au><au>Hailu, Meseret F.</au><au>Lott, Breanne E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Cogent education</jtitle><date>2023-12-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2331-186X</issn><eissn>2331-186X</eissn><abstract>In Ethiopia, women's access to higher education is a priority for many higher education leaders. Moreover, education access and participation are often measured quantitatively through enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Often overlooked, however, are qualitative outcomes related to gender. To address this gap in the literature, we explore faculty perspectives on gender inequities in Ethiopian higher education by describing specific challenges to gender-equitable pedagogy and reporting participant-generated recommendations. We used an equity pedagogy framework and thematic analysis to examine qualitative data from interviews with 32 university faculty. We found that participants conflated equality with equity, and thus justified the use of a uniform pedagogy for all students. Barriers to gender equitable pedagogy included: pervasive gender stereotypes, curricula and learning environments centered on male learners, and the perception of "gender issues" as ancillary In relation to this last finding, faculty often viewed "gender issues" as political, societal, or outside the realm of their teaching responsibilities. Based on these findings, we discuss how gender inequity in Ethiopian higher education is systemic and should be approached as such. We conclude the paper with participant-generated recommendations.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/2331186X.2023.2249668</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-0117</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-186X |
ispartof | Cogent education, 2023-12, Vol.10 (2) |
issn | 2331-186X 2331-186X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2023_2249668 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Education Collection |
subjects | Access to Education College Faculty Ethiopia faculty Gender gender equity Gender Issues Graduation Rate Higher education Pedagogy Sex Stereotypes sub-Saharan Africa |
title | Gender-based pedagogical inequity: Exploring faculty perspectives in Ethiopia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A13%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender-based%20pedagogical%20inequity:%20Exploring%20faculty%20perspectives%20in%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20education&rft.au=Halkiyo,%20Atota%20B.&rft.date=2023-12-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2331-186X&rft.eissn=2331-186X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2249668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902247210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-28c49dc06595d3bad320a505636332bdf785ec5d40d417858d303636e3ea83273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902247210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |