Loading…
Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods
Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex gr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of information and telecommunication (Print) 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343 |
container_end_page | 439 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 425 |
container_title | Journal of information and telecommunication (Print) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. Śledzianowski, Albert |
description | Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24751839_2020_1749410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4a7ee8d714fb4832a38a68fd33c63b73</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2459163171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhCMEEqj0JyBF4sApxa8k9g1U8aiEBAc4Wxs_iksSB9sF9d-T0tIjp12NZr61PFl2gdEMI46uCatLzKmYEURGqWaCYXSUnW31AnNWHx92Kk6zaYwrhBAhrGKMn2XNC4QP10ffX8Vcu2ggmlybL9P6oTN9yodgtFPJ-T5vNrkqlgH6dWty5bthnVy__N1gdOXJjwRrTdjmbhd5Z9K71_E8O7HQRjPdz0n2dn_3On8snp4fFvPbp0JRIVJRgVaYcFHiRlFiOdeYI0txWSEtkC1RCRUDrEXVKNQwVgPRokFcgCAlpYxOssWOqz2s5BBcB2EjPTj5K_iwlBCSU62RDGpjuK4xsw3jlADlUHGrKVUVbWo6si53rCH4z7WJSa78OvTj8yVhpcAVxTUeXeXOpYKPMRh7uIqR3LYj_9qR23bkvp0xd7PLud760MG3D62WCTatD3b8X-WipP8jfgCeGZV-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2459163171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-1839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-1847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; aggregation ; Computation ; disease model ; disease progression ; Fuzzy set theory ; Fuzzy sets ; Granular computing ; Granular materials ; Machine learning ; Parkinson's disease ; Set theory ; Signs and symptoms ; similarity</subject><ispartof>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print), 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2459163171?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27502,27924,27925,37012,44590,59143,59144</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><title>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</title><description>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>aggregation</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>disease model</subject><subject>disease progression</subject><subject>Fuzzy set theory</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Granular computing</subject><subject>Granular materials</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>similarity</subject><issn>2475-1839</issn><issn>2475-1847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhCMEEqj0JyBF4sApxa8k9g1U8aiEBAc4Wxs_iksSB9sF9d-T0tIjp12NZr61PFl2gdEMI46uCatLzKmYEURGqWaCYXSUnW31AnNWHx92Kk6zaYwrhBAhrGKMn2XNC4QP10ffX8Vcu2ggmlybL9P6oTN9yodgtFPJ-T5vNrkqlgH6dWty5bthnVy__N1gdOXJjwRrTdjmbhd5Z9K71_E8O7HQRjPdz0n2dn_3On8snp4fFvPbp0JRIVJRgVaYcFHiRlFiOdeYI0txWSEtkC1RCRUDrEXVKNQwVgPRokFcgCAlpYxOssWOqz2s5BBcB2EjPTj5K_iwlBCSU62RDGpjuK4xsw3jlADlUHGrKVUVbWo6si53rCH4z7WJSa78OvTj8yVhpcAVxTUeXeXOpYKPMRh7uIqR3LYj_9qR23bkvp0xd7PLud760MG3D62WCTatD3b8X-WipP8jfgCeGZV-</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creator><creator>Śledzianowski, Albert</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><author>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>aggregation</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>disease model</topic><topic>disease progression</topic><topic>Fuzzy set theory</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Granular computing</topic><topic>Granular materials</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>similarity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</au><au>Śledzianowski, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>425-439</pages><issn>2475-1839</issn><eissn>2475-1847</eissn><abstract>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2475-1839 |
ispartof | Journal of information and telecommunication (Print), 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439 |
issn | 2475-1839 2475-1847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24751839_2020_1749410 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Accuracy aggregation Computation disease model disease progression Fuzzy set theory Fuzzy sets Granular computing Granular materials Machine learning Parkinson's disease Set theory Signs and symptoms similarity |
title | Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parkinson's%20disease%20development%20prediction%20by%20c-granule%20computing%20compared%20to%20different%20AI%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information%20and%20telecommunication%20(Print)&rft.au=Przybyszewski,%20Andrzej%20W.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=425-439&rft.issn=2475-1839&rft.eissn=2475-1847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2459163171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2459163171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |