Loading…

Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods

Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of information and telecommunication (Print) 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439
Main Authors: Przybyszewski, Andrzej W., Śledzianowski, Albert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343
container_end_page 439
container_issue 4
container_start_page 425
container_title Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)
container_volume 4
creator Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.
Śledzianowski, Albert
description Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24751839_2020_1749410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4a7ee8d714fb4832a38a68fd33c63b73</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2459163171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhCMEEqj0JyBF4sApxa8k9g1U8aiEBAc4Wxs_iksSB9sF9d-T0tIjp12NZr61PFl2gdEMI46uCatLzKmYEURGqWaCYXSUnW31AnNWHx92Kk6zaYwrhBAhrGKMn2XNC4QP10ffX8Vcu2ggmlybL9P6oTN9yodgtFPJ-T5vNrkqlgH6dWty5bthnVy__N1gdOXJjwRrTdjmbhd5Z9K71_E8O7HQRjPdz0n2dn_3On8snp4fFvPbp0JRIVJRgVaYcFHiRlFiOdeYI0txWSEtkC1RCRUDrEXVKNQwVgPRokFcgCAlpYxOssWOqz2s5BBcB2EjPTj5K_iwlBCSU62RDGpjuK4xsw3jlADlUHGrKVUVbWo6si53rCH4z7WJSa78OvTj8yVhpcAVxTUeXeXOpYKPMRh7uIqR3LYj_9qR23bkvp0xd7PLud760MG3D62WCTatD3b8X-WipP8jfgCeGZV-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2459163171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-1839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-1847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; aggregation ; Computation ; disease model ; disease progression ; Fuzzy set theory ; Fuzzy sets ; Granular computing ; Granular materials ; Machine learning ; Parkinson's disease ; Set theory ; Signs and symptoms ; similarity</subject><ispartof>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print), 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2459163171?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27502,27924,27925,37012,44590,59143,59144</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><title>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</title><description>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>aggregation</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>disease model</subject><subject>disease progression</subject><subject>Fuzzy set theory</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Granular computing</subject><subject>Granular materials</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>similarity</subject><issn>2475-1839</issn><issn>2475-1847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhCMEEqj0JyBF4sApxa8k9g1U8aiEBAc4Wxs_iksSB9sF9d-T0tIjp12NZr61PFl2gdEMI46uCatLzKmYEURGqWaCYXSUnW31AnNWHx92Kk6zaYwrhBAhrGKMn2XNC4QP10ffX8Vcu2ggmlybL9P6oTN9yodgtFPJ-T5vNrkqlgH6dWty5bthnVy__N1gdOXJjwRrTdjmbhd5Z9K71_E8O7HQRjPdz0n2dn_3On8snp4fFvPbp0JRIVJRgVaYcFHiRlFiOdeYI0txWSEtkC1RCRUDrEXVKNQwVgPRokFcgCAlpYxOssWOqz2s5BBcB2EjPTj5K_iwlBCSU62RDGpjuK4xsw3jlADlUHGrKVUVbWo6si53rCH4z7WJSa78OvTj8yVhpcAVxTUeXeXOpYKPMRh7uIqR3LYj_9qR23bkvp0xd7PLud760MG3D62WCTatD3b8X-WipP8jfgCeGZV-</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creator><creator>Śledzianowski, Albert</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</title><author>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W. ; Śledzianowski, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>aggregation</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>disease model</topic><topic>disease progression</topic><topic>Fuzzy set theory</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Granular computing</topic><topic>Granular materials</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>similarity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Śledzianowski, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Przybyszewski, Andrzej W.</au><au>Śledzianowski, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information and telecommunication (Print)</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>425-439</pages><issn>2475-1839</issn><eissn>2475-1847</eissn><abstract>Both rough set theory (RST) and fuzzy rough set theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) primarily with the help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. Our complex granule (c-granule) approach was used to model longitudinal PD development. With RST/FRST we were looking for similarities between attributes of patients in different disease stages to more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1-V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to the other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST, we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST), we've got the following accuracies: G1V1 −59 (38)%; G1V2 - 68 (54)%; G1V3 - 86 (61)%, but global coverage for FRST was better. We also tried to compare results with several different machine learning methods, obtaining accuracies of G1V1 - 59%, G1V2 - 73%, and G1V3 - 78%. In summary, several different methods confirmed that generally one group of PD patients during disease development become more similar to a different group of more advanced PD.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-7856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2475-1839
ispartof Journal of information and telecommunication (Print), 2020-10, Vol.4 (4), p.425-439
issn 2475-1839
2475-1847
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24751839_2020_1749410
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Accuracy
aggregation
Computation
disease model
disease progression
Fuzzy set theory
Fuzzy sets
Granular computing
Granular materials
Machine learning
Parkinson's disease
Set theory
Signs and symptoms
similarity
title Parkinson's disease development prediction by c-granule computing compared to different AI methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parkinson's%20disease%20development%20prediction%20by%20c-granule%20computing%20compared%20to%20different%20AI%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information%20and%20telecommunication%20(Print)&rft.au=Przybyszewski,%20Andrzej%20W.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=425-439&rft.issn=2475-1839&rft.eissn=2475-1847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24751839.2020.1749410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2459163171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6adc128951bc32f88d180f31560d90f505a64a1d96bc0b447a2d9b089a9253343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2459163171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true