Loading…

Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus

From the maze of geophysical data little concrete evidence emerges to permit widely acceptable views on the strength of rocks at different depths in the earth's interior. Seismologists have established the existence of a high degree of rigidity down to great depths, but the commonly held view t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of geology 1935-10, Vol.43 (7), p.759-764
Main Author: De Lury, J. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a198t-5054003e965d4267e62ab2a2e1d66e7316e18ee70366cb783a91cf713accfeec3
cites
container_end_page 764
container_issue 7
container_start_page 759
container_title The Journal of geology
container_volume 43
creator De Lury, J. S.
description From the maze of geophysical data little concrete evidence emerges to permit widely acceptable views on the strength of rocks at different depths in the earth's interior. Seismologists have established the existence of a high degree of rigidity down to great depths, but the commonly held view that earthquakes are of shallow origin has lent support to the opinion that correspondingly shallow rocks alone can permit the slow accumulation of elastic stresses. This opinion must change with the growing evidence that earthquakes probably originate in all levels down to depths of 700 or more kilometers. The same evidence is disturbing to the assumptions of isostasy and to those hypotheses which rest on the concept of a shell of weakness.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/624366
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_624366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30057944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30057944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a198t-5054003e965d4267e62ab2a2e1d66e7316e18ee70366cb783a91cf713accfeec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8FOwzAQRC0EEqHAHyDlxC2wa8fr5IhKW5AqcYFz5DprSGlxsZMDf0-qIE5zmKfRPCGuEe4QKronWSqiE5GhVqbQkupTkQFIWaAydC4uUtoCoJIaMiFXHHbhvXP5I7eD67vwlXIfwz5f2Nh_fA_2k1Me_FjzIV8GN6RLcebtLvHVX87E23LxOn8q1i-r5_nDurBYV32hQZcAimvSbSnJMEm7kVYytkRsFBJjxWxgPOs2plK2RucNKuucZ3ZqJm6nXRdDSpF9c4jd3safBqE5mjaT6QjeTOA29SH-UwpAm7os1S-X_k1-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>De Lury, J. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Lury, J. S.</creatorcontrib><description>From the maze of geophysical data little concrete evidence emerges to permit widely acceptable views on the strength of rocks at different depths in the earth's interior. Seismologists have established the existence of a high degree of rigidity down to great depths, but the commonly held view that earthquakes are of shallow origin has lent support to the opinion that correspondingly shallow rocks alone can permit the slow accumulation of elastic stresses. This opinion must change with the growing evidence that earthquakes probably originate in all levels down to depths of 700 or more kilometers. The same evidence is disturbing to the assumptions of isostasy and to those hypotheses which rest on the concept of a shell of weakness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/624366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Earthquakes ; Geology ; Isostasy ; Proportional limit ; Rocks ; Seismology ; Society of Jesus</subject><ispartof>The Journal of geology, 1935-10, Vol.43 (7), p.759-764</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a198t-5054003e965d4267e62ab2a2e1d66e7316e18ee70366cb783a91cf713accfeec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30057944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30057944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,58221,58454</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Lury, J. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus</title><title>The Journal of geology</title><description>From the maze of geophysical data little concrete evidence emerges to permit widely acceptable views on the strength of rocks at different depths in the earth's interior. Seismologists have established the existence of a high degree of rigidity down to great depths, but the commonly held view that earthquakes are of shallow origin has lent support to the opinion that correspondingly shallow rocks alone can permit the slow accumulation of elastic stresses. This opinion must change with the growing evidence that earthquakes probably originate in all levels down to depths of 700 or more kilometers. The same evidence is disturbing to the assumptions of isostasy and to those hypotheses which rest on the concept of a shell of weakness.</description><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Isostasy</subject><subject>Proportional limit</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Society of Jesus</subject><issn>0022-1376</issn><issn>1537-5269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1935</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8FOwzAQRC0EEqHAHyDlxC2wa8fr5IhKW5AqcYFz5DprSGlxsZMDf0-qIE5zmKfRPCGuEe4QKronWSqiE5GhVqbQkupTkQFIWaAydC4uUtoCoJIaMiFXHHbhvXP5I7eD67vwlXIfwz5f2Nh_fA_2k1Me_FjzIV8GN6RLcebtLvHVX87E23LxOn8q1i-r5_nDurBYV32hQZcAimvSbSnJMEm7kVYytkRsFBJjxWxgPOs2plK2RucNKuucZ3ZqJm6nXRdDSpF9c4jd3safBqE5mjaT6QjeTOA29SH-UwpAm7os1S-X_k1-</recordid><startdate>19351001</startdate><enddate>19351001</enddate><creator>De Lury, J. S.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19351001</creationdate><title>Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus</title><author>De Lury, J. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a198t-5054003e965d4267e62ab2a2e1d66e7316e18ee70366cb783a91cf713accfeec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1935</creationdate><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Isostasy</topic><topic>Proportional limit</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Society of Jesus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Lury, J. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Lury, J. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of geology</jtitle><date>1935-10-01</date><risdate>1935</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>759-764</pages><issn>0022-1376</issn><eissn>1537-5269</eissn><abstract>From the maze of geophysical data little concrete evidence emerges to permit widely acceptable views on the strength of rocks at different depths in the earth's interior. Seismologists have established the existence of a high degree of rigidity down to great depths, but the commonly held view that earthquakes are of shallow origin has lent support to the opinion that correspondingly shallow rocks alone can permit the slow accumulation of elastic stresses. This opinion must change with the growing evidence that earthquakes probably originate in all levels down to depths of 700 or more kilometers. The same evidence is disturbing to the assumptions of isostasy and to those hypotheses which rest on the concept of a shell of weakness.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/624366</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1376
ispartof The Journal of geology, 1935-10, Vol.43 (7), p.759-764
issn 0022-1376
1537-5269
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_624366
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Earthquakes
Geology
Isostasy
Proportional limit
Rocks
Seismology
Society of Jesus
title Geologic Deductions from Earthquakes of Deep Focus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geologic%20Deductions%20from%20Earthquakes%20of%20Deep%20Focus&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20geology&rft.au=De%20Lury,%20J.%20S.&rft.date=1935-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=759-764&rft.issn=0022-1376&rft.eissn=1537-5269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/624366&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E30057944%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a198t-5054003e965d4267e62ab2a2e1d66e7316e18ee70366cb783a91cf713accfeec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30057944&rfr_iscdi=true