Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies

I investigate alternative explanations for the content of privacy policies. Under one model of self-regulation, firms signal their privacy protections to consumers by highlighting compliance with third-party guidelines. However, in a sample of 249 policies, only 27 percent claim compliance with a sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of legal studies 2016-06, Vol.45 (S2), p.S13-S39
Main Author: Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133
container_end_page S39
container_issue S2
container_start_page S13
container_title The Journal of legal studies
container_volume 45
creator Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
description I investigate alternative explanations for the content of privacy policies. Under one model of self-regulation, firms signal their privacy protections to consumers by highlighting compliance with third-party guidelines. However, in a sample of 249 policies, only 27 percent claim compliance with a specific guideline, and the policies that do claim compliance with at least one guideline are generally inconsistent with its requirements. Alternatively, under a market-based mechanism, firms incorporate consumers’ preferences directly. Consistent with this influence, there are several intuitive differences in terms across markets. Adult sites—none of which claim certification—are much more likely to give concise and clear notice of privacy practices and limit data sharing with third parties, while cloud-computing sites are particularly likely to follow stringent data security standards. Overall, privacy policy content appears to be shaped at least as much by market forces as by a self-regulatory regime based on external guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/689753
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_689753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26457118</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26457118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz8tKxDAUBuAgCtZR30DoQsRNNZfmtpTBGww46OxLmsuY0mlK0grz9lYrunV1OPBxzv8DcI7gDYKC3TIhOSUHIEOU8IISxg5BBmHJC0wJPAYnKTUQQlRingHyZltXvNrt2KrBhy5XncmXYdfbwX_vvsvX0X8ovc_XofXa23QKjpxqkz37mQuwebjfLJ-K1cvj8_JuVWhSwqFg3EpW11Q4qQ01usQQC0s4UayWknBcCyUlZljXUtTGWKemsHpSThtEyAJczWd1DClF66o--p2K-wrB6qtpNTed4OUMR_3utdqGPtqUqiaMsZvy_bHrf7CqN26iFzNt0hDi71_MSsoREuQT4rJpkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creator><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><description>I investigate alternative explanations for the content of privacy policies. Under one model of self-regulation, firms signal their privacy protections to consumers by highlighting compliance with third-party guidelines. However, in a sample of 249 policies, only 27 percent claim compliance with a specific guideline, and the policies that do claim compliance with at least one guideline are generally inconsistent with its requirements. Alternatively, under a market-based mechanism, firms incorporate consumers’ preferences directly. Consistent with this influence, there are several intuitive differences in terms across markets. Adult sites—none of which claim certification—are much more likely to give concise and clear notice of privacy practices and limit data sharing with third parties, while cloud-computing sites are particularly likely to follow stringent data security standards. Overall, privacy policy content appears to be shaped at least as much by market forces as by a self-regulatory regime based on external guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/689753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The University of Chicago Law School</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of legal studies, 2016-06, Vol.45 (S2), p.S13-S39</ispartof><rights>2016 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26457118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26457118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><title>Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies</title><title>The Journal of legal studies</title><description>I investigate alternative explanations for the content of privacy policies. Under one model of self-regulation, firms signal their privacy protections to consumers by highlighting compliance with third-party guidelines. However, in a sample of 249 policies, only 27 percent claim compliance with a specific guideline, and the policies that do claim compliance with at least one guideline are generally inconsistent with its requirements. Alternatively, under a market-based mechanism, firms incorporate consumers’ preferences directly. Consistent with this influence, there are several intuitive differences in terms across markets. Adult sites—none of which claim certification—are much more likely to give concise and clear notice of privacy practices and limit data sharing with third parties, while cloud-computing sites are particularly likely to follow stringent data security standards. Overall, privacy policy content appears to be shaped at least as much by market forces as by a self-regulatory regime based on external guidelines.</description><issn>0047-2530</issn><issn>1537-5366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNz8tKxDAUBuAgCtZR30DoQsRNNZfmtpTBGww46OxLmsuY0mlK0grz9lYrunV1OPBxzv8DcI7gDYKC3TIhOSUHIEOU8IISxg5BBmHJC0wJPAYnKTUQQlRingHyZltXvNrt2KrBhy5XncmXYdfbwX_vvsvX0X8ovc_XofXa23QKjpxqkz37mQuwebjfLJ-K1cvj8_JuVWhSwqFg3EpW11Q4qQ01usQQC0s4UayWknBcCyUlZljXUtTGWKemsHpSThtEyAJczWd1DClF66o--p2K-wrB6qtpNTed4OUMR_3utdqGPtqUqiaMsZvy_bHrf7CqN26iFzNt0hDi71_MSsoREuQT4rJpkw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creator><general>The University of Chicago Law School</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies</title><author>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>S13</spage><epage>S39</epage><pages>S13-S39</pages><issn>0047-2530</issn><eissn>1537-5366</eissn><abstract>I investigate alternative explanations for the content of privacy policies. Under one model of self-regulation, firms signal their privacy protections to consumers by highlighting compliance with third-party guidelines. However, in a sample of 249 policies, only 27 percent claim compliance with a specific guideline, and the policies that do claim compliance with at least one guideline are generally inconsistent with its requirements. Alternatively, under a market-based mechanism, firms incorporate consumers’ preferences directly. Consistent with this influence, there are several intuitive differences in terms across markets. Adult sites—none of which claim certification—are much more likely to give concise and clear notice of privacy practices and limit data sharing with third parties, while cloud-computing sites are particularly likely to follow stringent data security standards. Overall, privacy policy content appears to be shaped at least as much by market forces as by a self-regulatory regime based on external guidelines.</abstract><pub>The University of Chicago Law School</pub><doi>10.1086/689753</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2530
ispartof The Journal of legal studies, 2016-06, Vol.45 (S2), p.S13-S39
issn 0047-2530
1537-5366
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_689753
source Nexis UK; JSTOR
title Self-Regulation and Competition in Privacy Policies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-Regulation%20and%20Competition%20in%20Privacy%20Policies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Marotta-Wurgler,%20Florencia&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=S13&rft.epage=S39&rft.pages=S13-S39&rft.issn=0047-2530&rft.eissn=1537-5366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/689753&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26457118%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-67e96bb58f9cd5dc42028e373a6b99372b8a99262cb98bddefa536c202fcd133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26457118&rfr_iscdi=true