Loading…
How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy?
Mammalian placental pregnancy is a neglected problem case for theories of organismality. This example is closer to home than those typically discussed within philosophy of biology. I apply evolutionary and immunological accounts of organismality to the “counting question”: How many organisms are pre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophy of science 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1049-1060 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563 |
container_end_page | 1060 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1049 |
container_title | Philosophy of science |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Grose, Jonathan |
description | Mammalian placental pregnancy is a neglected problem case for theories of organismality. This example is closer to home than those typically discussed within philosophy of biology. I apply evolutionary and immunological accounts of organismality to the “counting question”: How many organisms are present during a placental pregnancy? I conclude that an evolutionary approach yields the answer two, because of bottlenecking, germ-soma sequestration, and sexual recombination. By contrast, an immunological approach answers one, because of pervasive interactions across the placenta. This analysis expands and refines recent work on a biologically informed metaphysics of pregnancy, an undertheorized area of philosophy of science. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/710542 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_710542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470546178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAYhYMoWKf-hoKyu-r7Js3HrkSGOmEyLxS8C0ma1g7X1mRF-u-tdODVuXl4DucQcolwg6DErUTgOT0iCXK2yKSQH8ckAWCYKZqrU3IW4xYAUYFKyHzV_qQvphnSTahMU8ddTIs-1E2VmvQ1-KoxjRvuzslJab6ivzjkjLw_PrwtV9l68_S8vF9njiHdZ6VESj0oLhXkXHm7MIU1boFSSQvMC8ipM1wiWg4FWIMgvGSeGlFaxgWbkavJ24X2u_dxr7dtH5qxUtNcjrvEqBqp-US50MYYfKm7UO9MGDSC_vtATx-M4PUE9u6zdqZqu-Bj_HcesF9bGVd2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470546178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Grose, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Grose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Mammalian placental pregnancy is a neglected problem case for theories of organismality. This example is closer to home than those typically discussed within philosophy of biology. I apply evolutionary and immunological accounts of organismality to the “counting question”: How many organisms are present during a placental pregnancy? I conclude that an evolutionary approach yields the answer two, because of bottlenecking, germ-soma sequestration, and sexual recombination. By contrast, an immunological approach answers one, because of pervasive interactions across the placenta. This analysis expands and refines recent work on a biologically informed metaphysics of pregnancy, an undertheorized area of philosophy of science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-767X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/710542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Biology ; Counting ; Immunology ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of science ; Placenta ; Pregnancy ; Recombination</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1049-1060</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy?</title><title>Philosophy of science</title><description>Mammalian placental pregnancy is a neglected problem case for theories of organismality. This example is closer to home than those typically discussed within philosophy of biology. I apply evolutionary and immunological accounts of organismality to the “counting question”: How many organisms are present during a placental pregnancy? I conclude that an evolutionary approach yields the answer two, because of bottlenecking, germ-soma sequestration, and sexual recombination. By contrast, an immunological approach answers one, because of pervasive interactions across the placenta. This analysis expands and refines recent work on a biologically informed metaphysics of pregnancy, an undertheorized area of philosophy of science.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Recombination</subject><issn>0031-8248</issn><issn>1539-767X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAYhYMoWKf-hoKyu-r7Js3HrkSGOmEyLxS8C0ma1g7X1mRF-u-tdODVuXl4DucQcolwg6DErUTgOT0iCXK2yKSQH8ckAWCYKZqrU3IW4xYAUYFKyHzV_qQvphnSTahMU8ddTIs-1E2VmvQ1-KoxjRvuzslJab6ivzjkjLw_PrwtV9l68_S8vF9njiHdZ6VESj0oLhXkXHm7MIU1boFSSQvMC8ipM1wiWg4FWIMgvGSeGlFaxgWbkavJ24X2u_dxr7dtH5qxUtNcjrvEqBqp-US50MYYfKm7UO9MGDSC_vtATx-M4PUE9u6zdqZqu-Bj_HcesF9bGVd2</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Grose, Jonathan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy?</title><author>Grose, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Recombination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grose, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy?</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1049</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1049-1060</pages><issn>0031-8248</issn><eissn>1539-767X</eissn><abstract>Mammalian placental pregnancy is a neglected problem case for theories of organismality. This example is closer to home than those typically discussed within philosophy of biology. I apply evolutionary and immunological accounts of organismality to the “counting question”: How many organisms are present during a placental pregnancy? I conclude that an evolutionary approach yields the answer two, because of bottlenecking, germ-soma sequestration, and sexual recombination. By contrast, an immunological approach answers one, because of pervasive interactions across the placenta. This analysis expands and refines recent work on a biologically informed metaphysics of pregnancy, an undertheorized area of philosophy of science.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/710542</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-8248 |
ispartof | Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1049-1060 |
issn | 0031-8248 1539-767X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_710542 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Biology Counting Immunology Metaphysics Philosophy Philosophy of science Placenta Pregnancy Recombination |
title | How Many Organisms during a Pregnancy? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A02%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Many%20Organisms%20during%20a%20Pregnancy?&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20science&rft.au=Grose,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1049&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1049-1060&rft.issn=0031-8248&rft.eissn=1539-767X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/710542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470546178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f7122e085780458eb9adbac91787b03e6042ca5711b50d0ba106e73e2a6fb3563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470546178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |