Input Efficiency as a Solution to Externalities and Resource Scarcity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Resource-conserving technologies are widely reported to benefit both the people who adopt them and the environment. Evidence for these “win-win” claims comes largely from modeling or nonexperimental designs and mostly from the energy sector. In a randomized trial of water-efficient technologies, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2024-01, Vol.11 (1), p.171-211
Main Authors: Alpizar, Francisco, Bernedo Del Carpio, María, Ferraro, Paul J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Water use
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Resource-conserving technologies are widely reported to benefit both the people who adopt them and the environment. Evidence for these “win-win” claims comes largely from modeling or nonexperimental designs and mostly from the energy sector. In a randomized trial of water-efficient technologies, the ex ante engineering estimate of water use reductions was three times higher than the experimental estimate, a divergence arising from engineering and behavioral reasons other than the rebound effect. Using detailed cost information and experimentally elicited time and risk preferences, we infer that the private welfare gains from adoption are, on average, negative, implying no “efficiency paradox.”
ISSN:2333-5955
2333-5963
DOI:10.1086/725700