Loading…
LIQHYSMES—size, loss and cost considerations for the SMES—a conceptual analysis
A new energy storage concept for variable renewable energy, LIQHYSMES, has been proposed which combines the use of liquid hydrogen (LH sub(2)) with superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). LH sub(2) with its high volumetric energy density and, compared with compressed hydrogen, increased oper...
Saved in:
Published in: | Superconductor science & technology 2011-10, Vol.24 (10), p.105008-1-6 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A new energy storage concept for variable renewable energy, LIQHYSMES, has been proposed which combines the use of liquid hydrogen (LH sub(2)) with superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). LH sub(2) with its high volumetric energy density and, compared with compressed hydrogen, increased operational safety is the prime energy carrier for large scale stationary energy storage. But balancing load or supply fluctuations with hydrogen alone is unrealistic due to the response times of the flow control. To operate the hydrogen part more steadily, additional short-term electrical energy storage is needed. For this purpose a SMES based on coated conductors or magnesium diboride MgB sub(2) operated in the LH sub(2) bath, is proposed. Different solenoidal and toroidal SMES designs for the 10 GJ range are compared in terms of size and ramping losses. Cost targets for different power levels and supply periods are addressed, taking into account current developments in competing short-term storage devices like super-capacitors, batteries and flywheels. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-2048 1361-6668 |
DOI: | 10.1088/0953-2048/24/10/105008 |