Lead aprons and thyroid collars: to be, or not to be?

• Published in: Journal of radiological protection 2023-09, Vol.43 (3), p.31516
• Main Authors: Engström, Andreas, Isaksson, Mats, Larsson, Per-Anders, Lundh, Charlotta, Båth, Magnus
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ALARA principle; lead apron; radiation protective apron; Radiologi och bildbehandling; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging; thyroid collar
• ISSN: 0952-4746; 1361-6498; 1361-6498
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/acf76f

Wearing lead aprons and thyroid collars for long periods of time has a subjective component: to balance the effective dose reduction with the effort of carrying a heavy load. Occupational radiation exposure has decreased dramatically in the last century within the health care system. During the same period the use of lead aprons and thyroid collars has also gone up. Therefore, a question that may be raised is: how safe is safe enough? In order to promote stakeholder involvement, the aim of the present study was to investigate staff’s experience of discomforts associated with wearing lead aprons and thyroid collars for long periods of time, and also to investigate staff’s willingness to tolerate personal dose equivalent (expressed as radiation dose) and the corresponding increase in future cancer risk to avoid wearing these protective tools. A questionnaire was developed and given to staff working in operating or angiography rooms at Skaraborg Hospital in Sweden. The results from the 245 respondents showed that 51% experienced bothersome warmth, 36% experienced fatigue and 26% experienced ache or pain that they believed was associated with wearing lead aprons. One third of the respondents would tolerate a personal dose equivalent of 1 mSv per year to avoid wearing lead aprons, but only a fifth would tolerate the corresponding increase in future cancer risk (from 43% to 43.2%). In conclusion, discomforts associated with wearing lead aprons and thyroid collars for long periods of time are common for the staff using them. At the same time, only a minority of the staff would tolerate a small increase in future cancer risk to avoid wearing them. The present study gives an example of stakeholder involvement and points at the difficulties in making reasonable decisions about the use of these protective tools.