Loading…

Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus

Objective . The aim of this study is to validate the estimation of the nonlinear shear modulus ( A ) from the acoustoelasticity theory with two experimental methods, ultrasound (US) elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and a finite element method. Approach . Experiments were perfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physics in medicine & biology 2023-10, Vol.68 (20), p.205003
Main Authors: Pagé, Gwenaël, Bied, Marion, Garteiser, Philippe, Van Beers, Bernard, Etaix, Nicolas, Fraschini, Christophe, Bel-Brunon, Aline, Gennisson, Jean-Luc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 205003
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 68
creator Pagé, Gwenaël
Bied, Marion
Garteiser, Philippe
Van Beers, Bernard
Etaix, Nicolas
Fraschini, Christophe
Bel-Brunon, Aline
Gennisson, Jean-Luc
description Objective . The aim of this study is to validate the estimation of the nonlinear shear modulus ( A ) from the acoustoelasticity theory with two experimental methods, ultrasound (US) elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and a finite element method. Approach . Experiments were performed on agar (2%)—gelatin (8%) phantom considered as homogeneous, elastic and isotropic. Two specific setups were built to ensure a uniaxial stress step by step on the phantom, one for US and a nonmagnetic version for MRE. The stress was controlled identically in both imaging techniques, with a water tank placed on the top of the phantom and filled with increasing masses of water during the experiment. In US, the supersonic shear wave elastography was implemented on an ultrafast US device, driving a 6 MHz linear array to measure shear wave speed. In MRE, a gradient-echo sequence was used in which the three spatial directions of a 40 Hz continuous wave displacement generated with an external driver were encoded successively. Numerically, a finite element method was developed to simulate the propagation of the shear wave in a uniaxially stressed soft medium. Main results . Similar shear moduli were estimated at zero stress using experimental methods, μ 0 U S = 12.3 ± 0.3 kPa and μ 0 M R E = 11.5 ± 0.7 kPa. Numerical simulations were set with a shear modulus of 12 kPa and the resulting nonlinear shear modulus was found to be −58.1 ± 0.7 kPa. A very good agreement between the finite element model and the experimental models ( A U S = −58.9 ± 9.9 kPa and A M R E = −52.8 ± 6.5 kPa) was obtained. Significance . These results show the validity of such nonlinear shear modulus measurement quantification in shear wave elastography. This work paves the way to develop nonlinear elastography technique to get a new biomarker for medical diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/acf98c
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_acf98c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2864898312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGL1DAUh4MoOK7ePea4wo6bNGkmPS6DusKAFz2H1_R1J0uadJNUmLP_uCmVBUGE8AI_vt-Dx0fIe84-cqb1LReK71Wr2C3YsdP2Bdk9Ry_JjjHB9x1v29fkTc6PjHGuG7kjv45xmiG5HAONI118SZDjEgaKHnKJDwnm8-WGTvAQsDhLE1YUgsW_AAq1MbrgyprjhKHQKQ7oaYn0aYFQ3HihIQbvAkKi-bzOSix-yW_JqxF8xnd__ivy4_On78f7_enbl6_Hu9PeCs1KnVz2BwlgD6IfWtkrq7lCq4YGQIFsbSeF0hyg70SvRKMQR8YaxAO2WvbiinzY9p7Bmzm5CdLFRHDm_u5k1oxJpbg-tD95Za83dk7xacFczOSyRe8hYFyyabSSutOCNxVlG2pTzDnh-LybM7O6MasIs4owm5taudkqLs7mMS4p1Lv_h1__A5-n3ihtGlZfW_2aeRjFb_yVoRc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864898312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Pagé, Gwenaël ; Bied, Marion ; Garteiser, Philippe ; Van Beers, Bernard ; Etaix, Nicolas ; Fraschini, Christophe ; Bel-Brunon, Aline ; Gennisson, Jean-Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Pagé, Gwenaël ; Bied, Marion ; Garteiser, Philippe ; Van Beers, Bernard ; Etaix, Nicolas ; Fraschini, Christophe ; Bel-Brunon, Aline ; Gennisson, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><description>Objective . The aim of this study is to validate the estimation of the nonlinear shear modulus ( A ) from the acoustoelasticity theory with two experimental methods, ultrasound (US) elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and a finite element method. Approach . Experiments were performed on agar (2%)—gelatin (8%) phantom considered as homogeneous, elastic and isotropic. Two specific setups were built to ensure a uniaxial stress step by step on the phantom, one for US and a nonmagnetic version for MRE. The stress was controlled identically in both imaging techniques, with a water tank placed on the top of the phantom and filled with increasing masses of water during the experiment. In US, the supersonic shear wave elastography was implemented on an ultrafast US device, driving a 6 MHz linear array to measure shear wave speed. In MRE, a gradient-echo sequence was used in which the three spatial directions of a 40 Hz continuous wave displacement generated with an external driver were encoded successively. Numerically, a finite element method was developed to simulate the propagation of the shear wave in a uniaxially stressed soft medium. Main results . Similar shear moduli were estimated at zero stress using experimental methods, μ 0 U S = 12.3 ± 0.3 kPa and μ 0 M R E = 11.5 ± 0.7 kPa. Numerical simulations were set with a shear modulus of 12 kPa and the resulting nonlinear shear modulus was found to be −58.1 ± 0.7 kPa. A very good agreement between the finite element model and the experimental models ( A U S = −58.9 ± 9.9 kPa and A M R E = −52.8 ± 6.5 kPa) was obtained. Significance . These results show the validity of such nonlinear shear modulus measurement quantification in shear wave elastography. This work paves the way to develop nonlinear elastography technique to get a new biomarker for medical diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf98c</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>acoustoelasticity theory ; elastography ; Engineering Sciences ; finite element simulation ; magnetic resonance elastography ; nonlinear shear modulus ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2023-10, Vol.68 (20), p.205003</ispartof><rights>2023 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4783-9298 ; 0000-0003-0157-8851 ; 0000-0001-8318-8237 ; 0000-0002-2398-9064</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04661875$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pagé, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bied, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garteiser, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Beers, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etaix, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraschini, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bel-Brunon, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennisson, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Objective . The aim of this study is to validate the estimation of the nonlinear shear modulus ( A ) from the acoustoelasticity theory with two experimental methods, ultrasound (US) elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and a finite element method. Approach . Experiments were performed on agar (2%)—gelatin (8%) phantom considered as homogeneous, elastic and isotropic. Two specific setups were built to ensure a uniaxial stress step by step on the phantom, one for US and a nonmagnetic version for MRE. The stress was controlled identically in both imaging techniques, with a water tank placed on the top of the phantom and filled with increasing masses of water during the experiment. In US, the supersonic shear wave elastography was implemented on an ultrafast US device, driving a 6 MHz linear array to measure shear wave speed. In MRE, a gradient-echo sequence was used in which the three spatial directions of a 40 Hz continuous wave displacement generated with an external driver were encoded successively. Numerically, a finite element method was developed to simulate the propagation of the shear wave in a uniaxially stressed soft medium. Main results . Similar shear moduli were estimated at zero stress using experimental methods, μ 0 U S = 12.3 ± 0.3 kPa and μ 0 M R E = 11.5 ± 0.7 kPa. Numerical simulations were set with a shear modulus of 12 kPa and the resulting nonlinear shear modulus was found to be −58.1 ± 0.7 kPa. A very good agreement between the finite element model and the experimental models ( A U S = −58.9 ± 9.9 kPa and A M R E = −52.8 ± 6.5 kPa) was obtained. Significance . These results show the validity of such nonlinear shear modulus measurement quantification in shear wave elastography. This work paves the way to develop nonlinear elastography technique to get a new biomarker for medical diagnosis.</description><subject>acoustoelasticity theory</subject><subject>elastography</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>finite element simulation</subject><subject>magnetic resonance elastography</subject><subject>nonlinear shear modulus</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcGL1DAUh4MoOK7ePea4wo6bNGkmPS6DusKAFz2H1_R1J0uadJNUmLP_uCmVBUGE8AI_vt-Dx0fIe84-cqb1LReK71Wr2C3YsdP2Bdk9Ry_JjjHB9x1v29fkTc6PjHGuG7kjv45xmiG5HAONI118SZDjEgaKHnKJDwnm8-WGTvAQsDhLE1YUgsW_AAq1MbrgyprjhKHQKQ7oaYn0aYFQ3HihIQbvAkKi-bzOSix-yW_JqxF8xnd__ivy4_On78f7_enbl6_Hu9PeCs1KnVz2BwlgD6IfWtkrq7lCq4YGQIFsbSeF0hyg70SvRKMQR8YaxAO2WvbiinzY9p7Bmzm5CdLFRHDm_u5k1oxJpbg-tD95Za83dk7xacFczOSyRe8hYFyyabSSutOCNxVlG2pTzDnh-LybM7O6MasIs4owm5taudkqLs7mMS4p1Lv_h1__A5-n3ihtGlZfW_2aeRjFb_yVoRc</recordid><startdate>20231021</startdate><enddate>20231021</enddate><creator>Pagé, Gwenaël</creator><creator>Bied, Marion</creator><creator>Garteiser, Philippe</creator><creator>Van Beers, Bernard</creator><creator>Etaix, Nicolas</creator><creator>Fraschini, Christophe</creator><creator>Bel-Brunon, Aline</creator><creator>Gennisson, Jean-Luc</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-8237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-9064</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231021</creationdate><title>Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus</title><author>Pagé, Gwenaël ; Bied, Marion ; Garteiser, Philippe ; Van Beers, Bernard ; Etaix, Nicolas ; Fraschini, Christophe ; Bel-Brunon, Aline ; Gennisson, Jean-Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>acoustoelasticity theory</topic><topic>elastography</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>finite element simulation</topic><topic>magnetic resonance elastography</topic><topic>nonlinear shear modulus</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pagé, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bied, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garteiser, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Beers, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etaix, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraschini, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bel-Brunon, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennisson, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pagé, Gwenaël</au><au>Bied, Marion</au><au>Garteiser, Philippe</au><au>Van Beers, Bernard</au><au>Etaix, Nicolas</au><au>Fraschini, Christophe</au><au>Bel-Brunon, Aline</au><au>Gennisson, Jean-Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2023-10-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>205003</spage><pages>205003-</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Objective . The aim of this study is to validate the estimation of the nonlinear shear modulus ( A ) from the acoustoelasticity theory with two experimental methods, ultrasound (US) elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and a finite element method. Approach . Experiments were performed on agar (2%)—gelatin (8%) phantom considered as homogeneous, elastic and isotropic. Two specific setups were built to ensure a uniaxial stress step by step on the phantom, one for US and a nonmagnetic version for MRE. The stress was controlled identically in both imaging techniques, with a water tank placed on the top of the phantom and filled with increasing masses of water during the experiment. In US, the supersonic shear wave elastography was implemented on an ultrafast US device, driving a 6 MHz linear array to measure shear wave speed. In MRE, a gradient-echo sequence was used in which the three spatial directions of a 40 Hz continuous wave displacement generated with an external driver were encoded successively. Numerically, a finite element method was developed to simulate the propagation of the shear wave in a uniaxially stressed soft medium. Main results . Similar shear moduli were estimated at zero stress using experimental methods, μ 0 U S = 12.3 ± 0.3 kPa and μ 0 M R E = 11.5 ± 0.7 kPa. Numerical simulations were set with a shear modulus of 12 kPa and the resulting nonlinear shear modulus was found to be −58.1 ± 0.7 kPa. A very good agreement between the finite element model and the experimental models ( A U S = −58.9 ± 9.9 kPa and A M R E = −52.8 ± 6.5 kPa) was obtained. Significance . These results show the validity of such nonlinear shear modulus measurement quantification in shear wave elastography. This work paves the way to develop nonlinear elastography technique to get a new biomarker for medical diagnosis.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/acf98c</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-8237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-9064</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2023-10, Vol.68 (20), p.205003
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_acf98c
source Institute of Physics
subjects acoustoelasticity theory
elastography
Engineering Sciences
finite element simulation
magnetic resonance elastography
nonlinear shear modulus
ultrasound
title Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ultrasound%20elastography,%20magnetic%20resonance%20elastography%20and%20finite%20element%20model%20to%20quantify%20nonlinear%20shear%20modulus&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Pag%C3%A9,%20Gwena%C3%ABl&rft.date=2023-10-21&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=205003&rft.pages=205003-&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/acf98c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2864898312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-c314b74aac73bd54b6c816ec6d2aa6a45c943681aab93b6326eef002ee7e584b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864898312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true