Addressing the sources of inter-subject variability in E-field parameters in anodal tDCS stimulation over motor cortical network

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology 2024-07, Vol.69 (14), p.145013
• Main Authors: Franco-Rosado, Pablo, Callejón, M Amparo, Reina-Tosina, Javier, Roa, Laura M, Martin-Rodriguez, Juan F, Mir, Pablo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: dose; inter-subject variability; motor cortex; supplementary motor cortex; tDCS
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad5bb9

Although tDCS constitutes a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with promising results in a great variety of applications, its clinical implementation is compromised by the high inter-subject variability reported. This study aims to analyze the inter-subject variability in electric fields (E-fields) over regions of the cortical motor network under two electrode montages: the classical C3Fp2 and an alternative P3F3, which confines more the Efield over this region. Methods: Computational models of the head of 98 healthy subjects were developed to simulate the E-field under both montages. E-field parameters such as magnitude, focality and orientation were calculated over three regions of interest (ROI): M1S1, SMA and preSMA. The role of anatomical characteristics as a source of inter-subject variability on E-field parameters was addressed using linear mixed-effect models. Results: P3F3 showed a more confined E-field distribution over M1S1 than C3Fp2; the latter elicited higher E-fields over supplementary motor areas. Both montages showed high inter-subject variability, especially for the normal component over C3Fp2. Skin, bone and CSF ROI volumes showed a negative association with E-field magnitude irrespective of montage. Grey matter volume and montage were the main sources of variability for focality. The curvature of gyri was found to be significantly associated with the variability of normal E-fields. Conclusions: Computational modelling proves useful in the assessment of E-field variability. Our simulations predict significant differences in E-field magnitude and focality for C3Fp2 and P3F3. However, anatomical characteristics were also found to be significant sources of E-field variability irrespective of electrode montage.&#xD.