Loads from Compressive Strain Caused by Mining Activity Illustrated with the Example of Two Buildings in Silesia

• Published in: IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2017-10, Vol.245 (2), p.22004
• Main Authors: Kadela, Marta, Chomacki, Leszek
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Buildings; Compressive properties; Mining; Passive pressure; Soil structure; Soils; Stress concentration; Stress distribution; Surface layers; Underground structures
• ISSN: 1757-8981; 1757-899X; 1757-899X
• DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/2/022004

The soil's load on retention walls or underground elements of engineering structures consists of three basic types of pressure: active pressure (pa), passive pressure (pb) and at-rest pressure (p0). In undisturbed areas without any mining, due to lack of activity in the soil, specific forces from the soil are stable and unchanging throughout the structure's life. Mining activity performed at a certain depth activates the soil. Displacements take place in the surface layer of the rock mass, which begins to act on the structure embedded in it, significantly changing the original stress distribution. Deformation of the subgrade, mainly horizontal strains, becomes a source of significant additional actions in the contact zone between the structure and the soil, constituting an additional load for the structure. In order to monitor the mining influence in the form of compressive load on building walls, an observation line was set up in front of two buildings located in Silesia (in Mysłowice). In 2013, some mining activity took place directly under those buildings, with expected horizontal strains of εx = -5.8 mm/m. The measurement results discussed in this paper showed that, as predicted, the buildings were subjected only to horizontal compressive strains with the values parallel to the analysed wall being less than -4.0 ‰ for first building and -1.5‰ for second building, and values perpendicular to the analysed wall being less than -6.0‰ for first building and -4.0‰ for second building (the only exception was the measurement in line 8-13, where εx = -17.04‰ for first building and -4.57‰ for second building). The horizontal displacement indicate that the impact of mining activity was greater on first building. This is also confirmed by inspections of the damage.