Loading…

An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments

There is about to be an abrupt step-change in the use of coastal seas around the globe, specifically by the addition of large-scale offshore renewable energy (ORE) developments to combat climate change. Developing this sustainable energy supply will require trade-offs between both direct and indirec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Progress in energy 2022-07, Vol.4 (3), p.32005
Main Authors: Trifonova, Neda, Scott, Beth, Griffin, Robert, Pennock, Shona, Jeffrey, Henry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 32005
container_title Progress in energy
container_volume 4
creator Trifonova, Neda
Scott, Beth
Griffin, Robert
Pennock, Shona
Jeffrey, Henry
description There is about to be an abrupt step-change in the use of coastal seas around the globe, specifically by the addition of large-scale offshore renewable energy (ORE) developments to combat climate change. Developing this sustainable energy supply will require trade-offs between both direct and indirect environmental effects, as well as spatial conflicts with marine uses like shipping, fishing, and recreation. However, the nexus between drivers, such as changes in the bio-physical environment from the introduction of structures and extraction of energy, and the consequent impacts on ecosystem services delivery and natural capital assets is poorly understood and rarely considered through a whole ecosystem perspective. Future marine planning needs to assess these changes as part of national policy level assessments but also to inform practitioners about the benefits and trade-offs between different uses of natural resources when making decisions to balance environmental and energy sustainability and socio-economic impacts. To address this shortfall, we propose an ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that builds on a dynamic Bayesian modelling approach which accounts for the multiplicity of interactions between physical (e.g. bottom temperature), biological (e.g. net primary production) indicators and anthropogenic marine use (i.e. fishing) and their changes across space and over time. The proposed assessment framework measures ecosystem change, changes in ecosystem goods and services and changes in socio-economic value in response to ORE deployment scenarios as well as climate change, to provide objective information for decision processes seeking to integrate new uses into our marine ecosystems. Such a framework has the potential of exploring the likely outcomes in the same metrics (both ecological and socio-economic) from alternative management and climate scenarios, such that objective judgements and decisions can be made, as to how to balance the benefits and trade-offs between a range of marine uses to deliver long-term environmental sustainability, economic benefits, and social welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2516-1083/ac702a
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2516_1083_ac702a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>prgeac702a</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtrwzAQhE1poSHNvUfdeqmblWX5cQyhLwj00p6FLK8TpbZkJCchP6b_tXJTSg8tLMyw7HwsE0XXFO4oFMU84TSLg2NzqXJI5Fk0-Vmd__KX0cz7LQCwJAFG00n0sTAElfVHP2AXV9JjTYwcdk62RMleD0FxL9udHLQ1pHGyw4N172TYyIEo21XaoCdo9tpZ06EZA9LUxFulbRzQxnZaEd31rVZfEE9sE6bxG-uQODR4kFWLgYFufSQ17rG1_YjyV9FFI1uPs2-dRm8P96_Lp3j18vi8XKxixXg6xIwpBAWlSrO6LIssyXjGGUcFSVVkJaQp5FBSXuVFlbMUKbKmTlRSlzzllCo2jeDEVc5677ARvdOddEdBQYwNi7HC0TFxajhEbk4RbXuxtTtnwoMhtkaRCiZCwwBc9HUTLm__uPwX_AnEKo3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Trifonova, Neda ; Scott, Beth ; Griffin, Robert ; Pennock, Shona ; Jeffrey, Henry</creator><creatorcontrib>Trifonova, Neda ; Scott, Beth ; Griffin, Robert ; Pennock, Shona ; Jeffrey, Henry</creatorcontrib><description>There is about to be an abrupt step-change in the use of coastal seas around the globe, specifically by the addition of large-scale offshore renewable energy (ORE) developments to combat climate change. Developing this sustainable energy supply will require trade-offs between both direct and indirect environmental effects, as well as spatial conflicts with marine uses like shipping, fishing, and recreation. However, the nexus between drivers, such as changes in the bio-physical environment from the introduction of structures and extraction of energy, and the consequent impacts on ecosystem services delivery and natural capital assets is poorly understood and rarely considered through a whole ecosystem perspective. Future marine planning needs to assess these changes as part of national policy level assessments but also to inform practitioners about the benefits and trade-offs between different uses of natural resources when making decisions to balance environmental and energy sustainability and socio-economic impacts. To address this shortfall, we propose an ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that builds on a dynamic Bayesian modelling approach which accounts for the multiplicity of interactions between physical (e.g. bottom temperature), biological (e.g. net primary production) indicators and anthropogenic marine use (i.e. fishing) and their changes across space and over time. The proposed assessment framework measures ecosystem change, changes in ecosystem goods and services and changes in socio-economic value in response to ORE deployment scenarios as well as climate change, to provide objective information for decision processes seeking to integrate new uses into our marine ecosystems. Such a framework has the potential of exploring the likely outcomes in the same metrics (both ecological and socio-economic) from alternative management and climate scenarios, such that objective judgements and decisions can be made, as to how to balance the benefits and trade-offs between a range of marine uses to deliver long-term environmental sustainability, economic benefits, and social welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2516-1083</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2516-1083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac702a</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PERNDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>climate change ; ecosystem service valuation ; energy policy ; fisheries production ; marine ecosystem ; marine renewable developments ; marine spatial planning</subject><ispartof>Progress in energy, 2022-07, Vol.4 (3), p.32005</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3332-4901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2516-1083/ac702a/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38845,53815</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trifonova, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennock, Shona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffrey, Henry</creatorcontrib><title>An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments</title><title>Progress in energy</title><addtitle>PRGE</addtitle><addtitle>Prog. Energy</addtitle><description>There is about to be an abrupt step-change in the use of coastal seas around the globe, specifically by the addition of large-scale offshore renewable energy (ORE) developments to combat climate change. Developing this sustainable energy supply will require trade-offs between both direct and indirect environmental effects, as well as spatial conflicts with marine uses like shipping, fishing, and recreation. However, the nexus between drivers, such as changes in the bio-physical environment from the introduction of structures and extraction of energy, and the consequent impacts on ecosystem services delivery and natural capital assets is poorly understood and rarely considered through a whole ecosystem perspective. Future marine planning needs to assess these changes as part of national policy level assessments but also to inform practitioners about the benefits and trade-offs between different uses of natural resources when making decisions to balance environmental and energy sustainability and socio-economic impacts. To address this shortfall, we propose an ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that builds on a dynamic Bayesian modelling approach which accounts for the multiplicity of interactions between physical (e.g. bottom temperature), biological (e.g. net primary production) indicators and anthropogenic marine use (i.e. fishing) and their changes across space and over time. The proposed assessment framework measures ecosystem change, changes in ecosystem goods and services and changes in socio-economic value in response to ORE deployment scenarios as well as climate change, to provide objective information for decision processes seeking to integrate new uses into our marine ecosystems. Such a framework has the potential of exploring the likely outcomes in the same metrics (both ecological and socio-economic) from alternative management and climate scenarios, such that objective judgements and decisions can be made, as to how to balance the benefits and trade-offs between a range of marine uses to deliver long-term environmental sustainability, economic benefits, and social welfare.</description><subject>climate change</subject><subject>ecosystem service valuation</subject><subject>energy policy</subject><subject>fisheries production</subject><subject>marine ecosystem</subject><subject>marine renewable developments</subject><subject>marine spatial planning</subject><issn>2516-1083</issn><issn>2516-1083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtrwzAQhE1poSHNvUfdeqmblWX5cQyhLwj00p6FLK8TpbZkJCchP6b_tXJTSg8tLMyw7HwsE0XXFO4oFMU84TSLg2NzqXJI5Fk0-Vmd__KX0cz7LQCwJAFG00n0sTAElfVHP2AXV9JjTYwcdk62RMleD0FxL9udHLQ1pHGyw4N172TYyIEo21XaoCdo9tpZ06EZA9LUxFulbRzQxnZaEd31rVZfEE9sE6bxG-uQODR4kFWLgYFufSQ17rG1_YjyV9FFI1uPs2-dRm8P96_Lp3j18vi8XKxixXg6xIwpBAWlSrO6LIssyXjGGUcFSVVkJaQp5FBSXuVFlbMUKbKmTlRSlzzllCo2jeDEVc5677ARvdOddEdBQYwNi7HC0TFxajhEbk4RbXuxtTtnwoMhtkaRCiZCwwBc9HUTLm__uPwX_AnEKo3o</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Trifonova, Neda</creator><creator>Scott, Beth</creator><creator>Griffin, Robert</creator><creator>Pennock, Shona</creator><creator>Jeffrey, Henry</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-4901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments</title><author>Trifonova, Neda ; Scott, Beth ; Griffin, Robert ; Pennock, Shona ; Jeffrey, Henry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>climate change</topic><topic>ecosystem service valuation</topic><topic>energy policy</topic><topic>fisheries production</topic><topic>marine ecosystem</topic><topic>marine renewable developments</topic><topic>marine spatial planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trifonova, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennock, Shona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffrey, Henry</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Progress in energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trifonova, Neda</au><au>Scott, Beth</au><au>Griffin, Robert</au><au>Pennock, Shona</au><au>Jeffrey, Henry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments</atitle><jtitle>Progress in energy</jtitle><stitle>PRGE</stitle><addtitle>Prog. Energy</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>32005</spage><pages>32005-</pages><issn>2516-1083</issn><eissn>2516-1083</eissn><coden>PERNDG</coden><abstract>There is about to be an abrupt step-change in the use of coastal seas around the globe, specifically by the addition of large-scale offshore renewable energy (ORE) developments to combat climate change. Developing this sustainable energy supply will require trade-offs between both direct and indirect environmental effects, as well as spatial conflicts with marine uses like shipping, fishing, and recreation. However, the nexus between drivers, such as changes in the bio-physical environment from the introduction of structures and extraction of energy, and the consequent impacts on ecosystem services delivery and natural capital assets is poorly understood and rarely considered through a whole ecosystem perspective. Future marine planning needs to assess these changes as part of national policy level assessments but also to inform practitioners about the benefits and trade-offs between different uses of natural resources when making decisions to balance environmental and energy sustainability and socio-economic impacts. To address this shortfall, we propose an ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that builds on a dynamic Bayesian modelling approach which accounts for the multiplicity of interactions between physical (e.g. bottom temperature), biological (e.g. net primary production) indicators and anthropogenic marine use (i.e. fishing) and their changes across space and over time. The proposed assessment framework measures ecosystem change, changes in ecosystem goods and services and changes in socio-economic value in response to ORE deployment scenarios as well as climate change, to provide objective information for decision processes seeking to integrate new uses into our marine ecosystems. Such a framework has the potential of exploring the likely outcomes in the same metrics (both ecological and socio-economic) from alternative management and climate scenarios, such that objective judgements and decisions can be made, as to how to balance the benefits and trade-offs between a range of marine uses to deliver long-term environmental sustainability, economic benefits, and social welfare.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2516-1083/ac702a</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-4901</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2516-1083
ispartof Progress in energy, 2022-07, Vol.4 (3), p.32005
issn 2516-1083
2516-1083
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1088_2516_1083_ac702a
source Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; Institute of Physics
subjects climate change
ecosystem service valuation
energy policy
fisheries production
marine ecosystem
marine renewable developments
marine spatial planning
title An ecosystem-based natural capital evaluation framework that combines environmental and socio-economic implications of offshore renewable energy developments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A32%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20ecosystem-based%20natural%20capital%20evaluation%20framework%20that%20combines%20environmental%20and%20socio-economic%20implications%20of%20offshore%20renewable%20energy%20developments&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20energy&rft.au=Trifonova,%20Neda&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=32005&rft.pages=32005-&rft.issn=2516-1083&rft.eissn=2516-1083&rft.coden=PERNDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2516-1083/ac702a&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Eprgeac702a%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-33ce0c09c46d99862656535ec02b869044070915b78b734e1e3fd2c2d954511c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true