Retailer Proximity and Nutrition Program Redemptions: Evidence From the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer For Children Program

Abstract Although nearly all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits are redeemed, a moderate share of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) benefits go unredeemed. Some hypothesize that the redemption rate differences are due to the lower density of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied economic perspectives and policy 2019-03, Vol.41 (1), p.71-95
Main Authors: Furey, Jane, Klerman, Jacob Alex, Grindal, Todd
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
benefit redemption
Children
Discount coupons
food access
Food deserts
Food programs
geospatial analysis
Households
Nutrition
SNAP
Summer
WIC
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Although nearly all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits are redeemed, a moderate share of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) benefits go unredeemed. Some hypothesize that the redemption rate differences are due to the lower density of WIC-authorized retailers. For the 2012 Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer for Children sites, this paper finds no consistent evidence of a relationship between redemption rates and retailer proximity. In fact, households often travel past the closest participating retailer to redeem their benefits. These findings are consistent with recent “food deserts” literature, which suggests that correlations between retailer environment and nutritional outcomes are not causal. Rather, it appears that differences in redemption rates may be related to the restrictions on what foods can be redeemed in what form with WIC.
ISSN:2040-5790
2040-5804
DOI:10.1093/aepp/ppy003