Loading…
A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile
Abstract Purpose This study examined differences in clinical profiles (e.g., post-traumatic migraine, vestibular, anxiety/mood, oculomotor, and cognitive) between exercise tolerance groups determined by the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT). We hypothesized the exercise-intolerant group would be m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.1295-1295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1295 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1295 |
container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Burley, C Zynda, A J Kehinde, F Trbovich, A Holland, C Womble, M Collins, M W Elbin, R J Kontos, A P |
description | Abstract
Purpose
This study examined differences in clinical profiles (e.g., post-traumatic migraine, vestibular, anxiety/mood, oculomotor, and cognitive) between exercise tolerance groups determined by the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT). We hypothesized the exercise-intolerant group would be more likely to have anxiety and/or vestibular profiles.
Method
Patients (18–49 years; 8 days to 6 months from concussion) completed demographic and medical history, the Clinical Profile Screen, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and BCBT. Participants were adjudicated into one or more clinical profiles and classified as exercise tolerant or intolerant. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare demographics, clinical profiles, reasons for stopping the BCBT, and ANS metrics.
Results
One hundred six participants (mean age = 27.9¬ ± 8.1, 62.3% female) were included in the study (71 exercise-intolerant; 35 exercise-tolerant). No demographic or medical history differences were noted between groups. The exercise-intolerant group had significantly lower odds of having an adjudicated headache profile (OR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.16–0.93, p = 0.03) and significantly greater odds of having an adjudicated autonomic profile (OR = 2.28, 95%CI = 1.01–5.21, p = 0.04). A greater proportion of those with the vestibular profile stopped the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation than those without (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Adjudicated clinical profiles and ANS metrics were similar between exercise-tolerant and intolerant groups. Vestibular sensitivities have a considerable contribution to symptom provocation during the BCBT, as a significant proportion of participants with the vestibular profile discontinued the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation. These findings corroborate previous research and suggest that exercise intolerance is pervasive across all concussion clinical profiles and should be considered in all evaluations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/arclin/acae052.42 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acae052_42</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/arclin/acae052.42</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/arclin/acae052.42</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792-17bca301c3445bc9fce379e24dfef5e14c70b353b1cf3706899ace2fa15875d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANz8AKT1L06OJbSAVAkOuUfOZi0ZpXZlNxK8PanaQ4-cZjTaWY0-Qh45W3BWyaVNMPiwtGCRabFQ4orMeGlkoUslry_8LbnL-ZsxpjkXM9KvaEGVoK_eOUwYADP1ga5_MIHPSJs4YLJTTG3o6Wo8xBB3HuhmDHDwMdAXm7Gnk6ljgDHnY1ZPUzzYgX6l6PyA9-TG2SHjw1nnpNmsm_q92H6-fdSrbQGmEgU3HVjJOEildAeVA5SmQqF6h04jV2BYJ7XsODhp2HNZVRZQOMt1aXQv5Zzw01tIMeeErt0nv7Ppt-WsPVJqT5TaM6VWianzdOrEcf-P8z-UqWy5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Burley, C ; Zynda, A J ; Kehinde, F ; Trbovich, A ; Holland, C ; Womble, M ; Collins, M W ; Elbin, R J ; Kontos, A P</creator><creatorcontrib>Burley, C ; Zynda, A J ; Kehinde, F ; Trbovich, A ; Holland, C ; Womble, M ; Collins, M W ; Elbin, R J ; Kontos, A P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Purpose
This study examined differences in clinical profiles (e.g., post-traumatic migraine, vestibular, anxiety/mood, oculomotor, and cognitive) between exercise tolerance groups determined by the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT). We hypothesized the exercise-intolerant group would be more likely to have anxiety and/or vestibular profiles.
Method
Patients (18–49 years; 8 days to 6 months from concussion) completed demographic and medical history, the Clinical Profile Screen, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and BCBT. Participants were adjudicated into one or more clinical profiles and classified as exercise tolerant or intolerant. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare demographics, clinical profiles, reasons for stopping the BCBT, and ANS metrics.
Results
One hundred six participants (mean age = 27.9¬ ± 8.1, 62.3% female) were included in the study (71 exercise-intolerant; 35 exercise-tolerant). No demographic or medical history differences were noted between groups. The exercise-intolerant group had significantly lower odds of having an adjudicated headache profile (OR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.16–0.93, p = 0.03) and significantly greater odds of having an adjudicated autonomic profile (OR = 2.28, 95%CI = 1.01–5.21, p = 0.04). A greater proportion of those with the vestibular profile stopped the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation than those without (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Adjudicated clinical profiles and ANS metrics were similar between exercise-tolerant and intolerant groups. Vestibular sensitivities have a considerable contribution to symptom provocation during the BCBT, as a significant proportion of participants with the vestibular profile discontinued the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation. These findings corroborate previous research and suggest that exercise intolerance is pervasive across all concussion clinical profiles and should be considered in all evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae052.42</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.1295-1295</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burley, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zynda, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehinde, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trbovich, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womble, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbin, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontos, A P</creatorcontrib><title>A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><description>Abstract
Purpose
This study examined differences in clinical profiles (e.g., post-traumatic migraine, vestibular, anxiety/mood, oculomotor, and cognitive) between exercise tolerance groups determined by the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT). We hypothesized the exercise-intolerant group would be more likely to have anxiety and/or vestibular profiles.
Method
Patients (18–49 years; 8 days to 6 months from concussion) completed demographic and medical history, the Clinical Profile Screen, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and BCBT. Participants were adjudicated into one or more clinical profiles and classified as exercise tolerant or intolerant. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare demographics, clinical profiles, reasons for stopping the BCBT, and ANS metrics.
Results
One hundred six participants (mean age = 27.9¬ ± 8.1, 62.3% female) were included in the study (71 exercise-intolerant; 35 exercise-tolerant). No demographic or medical history differences were noted between groups. The exercise-intolerant group had significantly lower odds of having an adjudicated headache profile (OR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.16–0.93, p = 0.03) and significantly greater odds of having an adjudicated autonomic profile (OR = 2.28, 95%CI = 1.01–5.21, p = 0.04). A greater proportion of those with the vestibular profile stopped the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation than those without (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Adjudicated clinical profiles and ANS metrics were similar between exercise-tolerant and intolerant groups. Vestibular sensitivities have a considerable contribution to symptom provocation during the BCBT, as a significant proportion of participants with the vestibular profile discontinued the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation. These findings corroborate previous research and suggest that exercise intolerance is pervasive across all concussion clinical profiles and should be considered in all evaluations.</description><issn>1873-5843</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANz8AKT1L06OJbSAVAkOuUfOZi0ZpXZlNxK8PanaQ4-cZjTaWY0-Qh45W3BWyaVNMPiwtGCRabFQ4orMeGlkoUslry_8LbnL-ZsxpjkXM9KvaEGVoK_eOUwYADP1ga5_MIHPSJs4YLJTTG3o6Wo8xBB3HuhmDHDwMdAXm7Gnk6ljgDHnY1ZPUzzYgX6l6PyA9-TG2SHjw1nnpNmsm_q92H6-fdSrbQGmEgU3HVjJOEildAeVA5SmQqF6h04jV2BYJ7XsODhp2HNZVRZQOMt1aXQv5Zzw01tIMeeErt0nv7Ppt-WsPVJqT5TaM6VWianzdOrEcf-P8z-UqWy5</recordid><startdate>20241025</startdate><enddate>20241025</enddate><creator>Burley, C</creator><creator>Zynda, A J</creator><creator>Kehinde, F</creator><creator>Trbovich, A</creator><creator>Holland, C</creator><creator>Womble, M</creator><creator>Collins, M W</creator><creator>Elbin, R J</creator><creator>Kontos, A P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241025</creationdate><title>A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile</title><author>Burley, C ; Zynda, A J ; Kehinde, F ; Trbovich, A ; Holland, C ; Womble, M ; Collins, M W ; Elbin, R J ; Kontos, A P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792-17bca301c3445bc9fce379e24dfef5e14c70b353b1cf3706899ace2fa15875d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burley, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zynda, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehinde, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trbovich, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womble, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbin, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontos, A P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burley, C</au><au>Zynda, A J</au><au>Kehinde, F</au><au>Trbovich, A</au><au>Holland, C</au><au>Womble, M</au><au>Collins, M W</au><au>Elbin, R J</au><au>Kontos, A P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><date>2024-10-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1295</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1295-1295</pages><issn>1873-5843</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Purpose
This study examined differences in clinical profiles (e.g., post-traumatic migraine, vestibular, anxiety/mood, oculomotor, and cognitive) between exercise tolerance groups determined by the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT). We hypothesized the exercise-intolerant group would be more likely to have anxiety and/or vestibular profiles.
Method
Patients (18–49 years; 8 days to 6 months from concussion) completed demographic and medical history, the Clinical Profile Screen, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and BCBT. Participants were adjudicated into one or more clinical profiles and classified as exercise tolerant or intolerant. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare demographics, clinical profiles, reasons for stopping the BCBT, and ANS metrics.
Results
One hundred six participants (mean age = 27.9¬ ± 8.1, 62.3% female) were included in the study (71 exercise-intolerant; 35 exercise-tolerant). No demographic or medical history differences were noted between groups. The exercise-intolerant group had significantly lower odds of having an adjudicated headache profile (OR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.16–0.93, p = 0.03) and significantly greater odds of having an adjudicated autonomic profile (OR = 2.28, 95%CI = 1.01–5.21, p = 0.04). A greater proportion of those with the vestibular profile stopped the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation than those without (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Adjudicated clinical profiles and ANS metrics were similar between exercise-tolerant and intolerant groups. Vestibular sensitivities have a considerable contribution to symptom provocation during the BCBT, as a significant proportion of participants with the vestibular profile discontinued the BCBT due to symptom exacerbation. These findings corroborate previous research and suggest that exercise intolerance is pervasive across all concussion clinical profiles and should be considered in all evaluations.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/arclin/acae052.42</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1873-5843 |
ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2024-10, Vol.39 (7), p.1295-1295 |
issn | 1873-5843 1873-5843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acae052_42 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
title | A - 42 Differences in Exercise Tolerance and Autonomic Function Based on Concussion Clinical Profile |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A30%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20-%2042%20Differences%20in%20Exercise%20Tolerance%20and%20Autonomic%20Function%20Based%20on%20Concussion%20Clinical%20Profile&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Burley,%20C&rft.date=2024-10-25&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1295-1295&rft.issn=1873-5843&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/arclin/acae052.42&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/arclin/acae052.42%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792-17bca301c3445bc9fce379e24dfef5e14c70b353b1cf3706899ace2fa15875d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/arclin/acae052.42&rfr_iscdi=true |