Loading…
P050 Analysis of 61 exclusive enteral nutrition formulas used for induction of remission in Crohn’s disease: new insights on dietary disease triggers
Abstract Background Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an effective treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD). We hypothesise that food ingredients which are included in EEN formulas are less likely to initiate a disease flare and that their dietary elimination is not essential for disease amelioration. M...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2020-01, Vol.14 (Supplement_1), p.S157-S158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract
Background
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an effective treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD). We hypothesise that food ingredients which are included in EEN formulas are less likely to initiate a disease flare and that their dietary elimination is not essential for disease amelioration.
Methods
We performed a compositional analysis of EEN formulas with evidence of clinical efficacy for the induction of remission in active CD. Macronutrient content was compared against the dietary reference values (DRVs), the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) and children with CD. Food additives included with EEN formulas were cross-referenced against the FAO/WHO database.
Results
Sixty-one formulas were identified with variable composition [carbohydrates (23–89%), protein (8–30%), fat (0–50%)], Figure 1. Modified starches (e.g. maltodextrin), milk protein and vegetable/plant oils were the commonest sources of carbohydrate, protein and fat, respectively, Figure 2. The n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio varied from 0.3 to 46.5. Fifty-six unique food additives were identified contained within EEN formulas (median per formula: 11), Figure 3. All formulas were lactose, gluten free. Eighty per cent lacked fibre. The five commonest food additive functional classes were emulsifiers, stabilisers, antioxidants, acidity regulators, and thickeners. Food additives, implicated in CD aetiology, were present in formulas [modified starches (100%), carrageenan (23%), carboxymethyl cellulose (14%) and polysorbate 80 (5%)]. EEN formulas derived 7.9% less energy from saturated fat than participants from the NDNS (p = 0.001). CD children consumed more sugars, total/saturated fat than the EEN content.
Conclusion
We provide a list of food ingredients which are unlikely, in the amount provided within EEN, to trigger CD activity. Current perceptions about the role of these ingredients in CD management are challenged. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-9946 1876-4479 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.179 |