Loading…
Bending curvatures of subducting plates: old versus young slabs
SUMMARY By combining scaled laboratory experiments and numerical simulations, this study presents a quantitative analysis of the bending radius (RB) of subducting slabs within the upper mantle, taking into account the effects of age (A). Based on a half-space cooling model, we constrain the density...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical journal international 2021-06, Vol.225 (3), p.1963-1981 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | SUMMARY
By combining scaled laboratory experiments and numerical simulations, this study presents a quantitative analysis of the bending radius (RB) of subducting slabs within the upper mantle, taking into account the effects of age (A). Based on a half-space cooling model, we constrain the density (ρ), viscosity (η) and thickness (h) of slabs as a function of A, and develop representative models to estimate RB for different A. Laboratory subduction models produce visually contrasting bending curvatures for young (A = 10 Ma), intermediate (A = 70 Ma) and old (A = 120 Ma) slabs. Young slabs undergo rollback, resulting in a small bending radius (scaled up RB ∼ 150 km), whereas old slabs subduct along a uniformly dipping trajectory with large bending radius (RB ∼ 500 km). Equivalent real scale computational fluid dynamic simulations reproduce similar bending patterns of the subducting slabs, and yield RB versus A relations fairly in agreement with the laboratory results. We balance the buoyancy driven bending, flexural-resistive moments and viscous flow induced suction moment to theoretically evaluate the rate of slab bending. The analytical solution suggests an inverse relation of the bending rate with A, which supports our experimental findings. Finally, slab geometries of selected natural subduction zones, derived from high-resolution seismic tomographic images have been compiled to validate the experimental RB versus A regression. We also discuss the subduction settings in which this regression no longer remains valid. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0956-540X 1365-246X |
DOI: | 10.1093/gji/ggab070 |