Loading…

InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors

Errors in the satellite orbits are considered to be a limitation for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series techniques to accurately measure long-wavelength (>50 km) ground displacements. Here we examine how orbital errors propagate into relative InSAR line-of-sight velocity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical journal international 2014-10, Vol.199 (1), p.549-560
Main Authors: Fattahi, Heresh, Amelung, Falk
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193
container_end_page 560
container_issue 1
container_start_page 549
container_title Geophysical journal international
container_volume 199
creator Fattahi, Heresh
Amelung, Falk
description Errors in the satellite orbits are considered to be a limitation for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series techniques to accurately measure long-wavelength (>50 km) ground displacements. Here we examine how orbital errors propagate into relative InSAR line-of-sight velocity fields and evaluate the contribution of orbital errors to the InSAR uncertainty. We express the InSAR uncertainty due to the orbital errors in terms of the standard deviations of the velocity gradients in range and azimuth directions (range and azimuth uncertainties). The range uncertainty depends on the magnitude of the orbital errors, the number and time span of acquisitions. Using reported orbital uncertainties we find range uncertainties of less than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for ERS, less than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for Envisat and ∼0.2 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1. Under a conservative scenario, we find azimuth uncertainties of better than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for older satellites (ERS and Envisat) and better than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for modern satellites (TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1). We validate the expected uncertainties using LOS velocity fields obtained from Envisat SAR imagery. We find residual gradients of 0.8 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in range and of 0.95 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in azimuth direction, which fall within the 1σ to 2σ uncertainties. The InSAR uncertainties due to the orbital errors are significantly smaller than generally expected. This shows the potential of InSAR systems to constrain long-wavelength geodynamic processes, such as continent-scale deformation across entire plate boundary zones.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/gji/ggu276
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggu276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/gji/ggu276</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/gji/ggu276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tKxDAYRoMoWEc3PkE2Ighx_lyaJsth8DIwIHiB2YU0TUuHsRmSdDFvb6WuXX3f4nDgIHRL4ZGC5stu3y-7bmSVPEMF5bIkTMjdOSpAl5KUAnaX6CqlPQAVVKgC3W-Gj9U7HgfnY7b9kE-4GT3OAYdY99kesI8xxHSNLlp7SP7mbxfo6_npc_1Ktm8vm_VqSyxnkAl3GoD7SrV1pRjXHkpaSWYb5oBZp1oFfvpK18I1gkPtHNXCKxCMW6CaL9DD7HUxpBR9a46x_7bxZCiY30QzJZo5cYLvZjiMx_-4H_iMULI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors</title><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><creator>Fattahi, Heresh ; Amelung, Falk</creator><creatorcontrib>Fattahi, Heresh ; Amelung, Falk</creatorcontrib><description>Errors in the satellite orbits are considered to be a limitation for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series techniques to accurately measure long-wavelength (&gt;50 km) ground displacements. Here we examine how orbital errors propagate into relative InSAR line-of-sight velocity fields and evaluate the contribution of orbital errors to the InSAR uncertainty. We express the InSAR uncertainty due to the orbital errors in terms of the standard deviations of the velocity gradients in range and azimuth directions (range and azimuth uncertainties). The range uncertainty depends on the magnitude of the orbital errors, the number and time span of acquisitions. Using reported orbital uncertainties we find range uncertainties of less than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for ERS, less than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for Envisat and ∼0.2 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1. Under a conservative scenario, we find azimuth uncertainties of better than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for older satellites (ERS and Envisat) and better than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for modern satellites (TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1). We validate the expected uncertainties using LOS velocity fields obtained from Envisat SAR imagery. We find residual gradients of 0.8 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in range and of 0.95 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in azimuth direction, which fall within the 1σ to 2σ uncertainties. The InSAR uncertainties due to the orbital errors are significantly smaller than generally expected. This shows the potential of InSAR systems to constrain long-wavelength geodynamic processes, such as continent-scale deformation across entire plate boundary zones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-540X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-246X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Geophysical journal international, 2014-10, Vol.199 (1), p.549-560</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fattahi, Heresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelung, Falk</creatorcontrib><title>InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors</title><title>Geophysical journal international</title><addtitle>Geophys. J. Int</addtitle><description>Errors in the satellite orbits are considered to be a limitation for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series techniques to accurately measure long-wavelength (&gt;50 km) ground displacements. Here we examine how orbital errors propagate into relative InSAR line-of-sight velocity fields and evaluate the contribution of orbital errors to the InSAR uncertainty. We express the InSAR uncertainty due to the orbital errors in terms of the standard deviations of the velocity gradients in range and azimuth directions (range and azimuth uncertainties). The range uncertainty depends on the magnitude of the orbital errors, the number and time span of acquisitions. Using reported orbital uncertainties we find range uncertainties of less than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for ERS, less than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for Envisat and ∼0.2 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1. Under a conservative scenario, we find azimuth uncertainties of better than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for older satellites (ERS and Envisat) and better than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for modern satellites (TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1). We validate the expected uncertainties using LOS velocity fields obtained from Envisat SAR imagery. We find residual gradients of 0.8 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in range and of 0.95 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in azimuth direction, which fall within the 1σ to 2σ uncertainties. The InSAR uncertainties due to the orbital errors are significantly smaller than generally expected. This shows the potential of InSAR systems to constrain long-wavelength geodynamic processes, such as continent-scale deformation across entire plate boundary zones.</description><issn>0956-540X</issn><issn>1365-246X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tKxDAYRoMoWEc3PkE2Ighx_lyaJsth8DIwIHiB2YU0TUuHsRmSdDFvb6WuXX3f4nDgIHRL4ZGC5stu3y-7bmSVPEMF5bIkTMjdOSpAl5KUAnaX6CqlPQAVVKgC3W-Gj9U7HgfnY7b9kE-4GT3OAYdY99kesI8xxHSNLlp7SP7mbxfo6_npc_1Ktm8vm_VqSyxnkAl3GoD7SrV1pRjXHkpaSWYb5oBZp1oFfvpK18I1gkPtHNXCKxCMW6CaL9DD7HUxpBR9a46x_7bxZCiY30QzJZo5cYLvZjiMx_-4H_iMULI</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Fattahi, Heresh</creator><creator>Amelung, Falk</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors</title><author>Fattahi, Heresh ; Amelung, Falk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fattahi, Heresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelung, Falk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fattahi, Heresh</au><au>Amelung, Falk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle><stitle>Geophys. J. Int</stitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>199</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>560</epage><pages>549-560</pages><issn>0956-540X</issn><eissn>1365-246X</eissn><abstract>Errors in the satellite orbits are considered to be a limitation for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series techniques to accurately measure long-wavelength (&gt;50 km) ground displacements. Here we examine how orbital errors propagate into relative InSAR line-of-sight velocity fields and evaluate the contribution of orbital errors to the InSAR uncertainty. We express the InSAR uncertainty due to the orbital errors in terms of the standard deviations of the velocity gradients in range and azimuth directions (range and azimuth uncertainties). The range uncertainty depends on the magnitude of the orbital errors, the number and time span of acquisitions. Using reported orbital uncertainties we find range uncertainties of less than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for ERS, less than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for Envisat and ∼0.2 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1. Under a conservative scenario, we find azimuth uncertainties of better than 1.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for older satellites (ERS and Envisat) and better than 0.5 mm yr−1 100 km−1 for modern satellites (TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1). We validate the expected uncertainties using LOS velocity fields obtained from Envisat SAR imagery. We find residual gradients of 0.8 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in range and of 0.95 mm yr−1 100 km−1 or less in azimuth direction, which fall within the 1σ to 2σ uncertainties. The InSAR uncertainties due to the orbital errors are significantly smaller than generally expected. This shows the potential of InSAR systems to constrain long-wavelength geodynamic processes, such as continent-scale deformation across entire plate boundary zones.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/gji/ggu276</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-540X
ispartof Geophysical journal international, 2014-10, Vol.199 (1), p.549-560
issn 0956-540X
1365-246X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggu276
source Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals
title InSAR uncertainty due to orbital errors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=InSAR%20uncertainty%20due%20to%20orbital%20errors&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20journal%20international&rft.au=Fattahi,%20Heresh&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=560&rft.pages=549-560&rft.issn=0956-540X&rft.eissn=1365-246X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gji/ggu276&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/gji/ggu276%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-3c9003e78fb78239e051762ad2c02ac8f80ed2c89b4cd430bcc194e80423a0193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/gji/ggu276&rfr_iscdi=true