Loading…

Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability

While it has been known for some time that offsets in the time-series of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position estimates degrade station velocity determinations, the magnitude of the effect has not been clear. Using products of the International GNSS Service (IGS), we assess the impact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical journal international 2016-01, Vol.204 (1), p.480-487
Main Authors: Griffiths, J., Ray, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323
container_end_page 487
container_issue 1
container_start_page 480
container_title Geophysical journal international
container_volume 204
creator Griffiths, J.
Ray, J.
description While it has been known for some time that offsets in the time-series of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position estimates degrade station velocity determinations, the magnitude of the effect has not been clear. Using products of the International GNSS Service (IGS), we assess the impact empirically by injecting progressively larger numbers of artificial offsets and solving for a series of long-term secular GNSS frames. Our results show that the stability of the IGS global frame datum is fairly robust, with significant effects at the formal error level only for the R x (and Y-pole) and R z rotational orientations. On the other hand, station velocity estimates are more seriously affected, especially the vertical component. For the typical IGS station, the mean vertical rate uncertainty is already limited to 0.34 mm yr−1 for the current set of position discontinuities. If the number of breaks doubles, which might occur using newer detection schemes, then that uncertainty will worsen by ∼40 per cent to 0.48 mm yr−1. This error source is generally a more important component of realistic velocity uncertainties than any other, including accounting for temporal correlations in the GNSS data. The only way to improve future GNSS velocity estimates is to severely limit manmade displacements at the tracking stations.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/gji/ggv455
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggv455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/gji/ggv455</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/gji/ggv455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01Lw0AURQdRMFY3_oLZuBFi32Q-knEnxdZC0UUVugtvpjNhStKETBT6702Ja7mLB_cdLhxC7hk8MdB8Xh3CvKp-hJQXJGFcyTQTandJEtBSpVLA7prcxHgAYIKJIiHP66ZDO0Taerp6325p18YwhPY4Fj668-NIq7o1WFPfY-NoHNCEOgynW3LlsY7u7u_OyNfy9XPxlm4-VuvFyyZFnsGQFlppA04pJYzmhbYGvRUZgh17gRbzMegl7rWRkO9zoYFrBGOcyjnP-Iw8Tru2b2PsnS-7PjTYn0oG5dm6HK3LyXqEHya4_e7-434BtF9Yeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability</title><source>Oxford Open</source><creator>Griffiths, J. ; Ray, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J. ; Ray, J.</creatorcontrib><description>While it has been known for some time that offsets in the time-series of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position estimates degrade station velocity determinations, the magnitude of the effect has not been clear. Using products of the International GNSS Service (IGS), we assess the impact empirically by injecting progressively larger numbers of artificial offsets and solving for a series of long-term secular GNSS frames. Our results show that the stability of the IGS global frame datum is fairly robust, with significant effects at the formal error level only for the R x (and Y-pole) and R z rotational orientations. On the other hand, station velocity estimates are more seriously affected, especially the vertical component. For the typical IGS station, the mean vertical rate uncertainty is already limited to 0.34 mm yr−1 for the current set of position discontinuities. If the number of breaks doubles, which might occur using newer detection schemes, then that uncertainty will worsen by ∼40 per cent to 0.48 mm yr−1. This error source is generally a more important component of realistic velocity uncertainties than any other, including accounting for temporal correlations in the GNSS data. The only way to improve future GNSS velocity estimates is to severely limit manmade displacements at the tracking stations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-540X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-246X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Geophysical journal international, 2016-01, Vol.204 (1), p.480-487</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability</title><title>Geophysical journal international</title><description>While it has been known for some time that offsets in the time-series of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position estimates degrade station velocity determinations, the magnitude of the effect has not been clear. Using products of the International GNSS Service (IGS), we assess the impact empirically by injecting progressively larger numbers of artificial offsets and solving for a series of long-term secular GNSS frames. Our results show that the stability of the IGS global frame datum is fairly robust, with significant effects at the formal error level only for the R x (and Y-pole) and R z rotational orientations. On the other hand, station velocity estimates are more seriously affected, especially the vertical component. For the typical IGS station, the mean vertical rate uncertainty is already limited to 0.34 mm yr−1 for the current set of position discontinuities. If the number of breaks doubles, which might occur using newer detection schemes, then that uncertainty will worsen by ∼40 per cent to 0.48 mm yr−1. This error source is generally a more important component of realistic velocity uncertainties than any other, including accounting for temporal correlations in the GNSS data. The only way to improve future GNSS velocity estimates is to severely limit manmade displacements at the tracking stations.</description><issn>0956-540X</issn><issn>1365-246X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01Lw0AURQdRMFY3_oLZuBFi32Q-knEnxdZC0UUVugtvpjNhStKETBT6702Ja7mLB_cdLhxC7hk8MdB8Xh3CvKp-hJQXJGFcyTQTandJEtBSpVLA7prcxHgAYIKJIiHP66ZDO0Taerp6325p18YwhPY4Fj668-NIq7o1WFPfY-NoHNCEOgynW3LlsY7u7u_OyNfy9XPxlm4-VuvFyyZFnsGQFlppA04pJYzmhbYGvRUZgh17gRbzMegl7rWRkO9zoYFrBGOcyjnP-Iw8Tru2b2PsnS-7PjTYn0oG5dm6HK3LyXqEHya4_e7-434BtF9Yeg</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Griffiths, J.</creator><creator>Ray, J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability</title><author>Griffiths, J. ; Ray, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffiths, J.</au><au>Ray, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical journal international</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>204</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>480</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>480-487</pages><issn>0956-540X</issn><eissn>1365-246X</eissn><abstract>While it has been known for some time that offsets in the time-series of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position estimates degrade station velocity determinations, the magnitude of the effect has not been clear. Using products of the International GNSS Service (IGS), we assess the impact empirically by injecting progressively larger numbers of artificial offsets and solving for a series of long-term secular GNSS frames. Our results show that the stability of the IGS global frame datum is fairly robust, with significant effects at the formal error level only for the R x (and Y-pole) and R z rotational orientations. On the other hand, station velocity estimates are more seriously affected, especially the vertical component. For the typical IGS station, the mean vertical rate uncertainty is already limited to 0.34 mm yr−1 for the current set of position discontinuities. If the number of breaks doubles, which might occur using newer detection schemes, then that uncertainty will worsen by ∼40 per cent to 0.48 mm yr−1. This error source is generally a more important component of realistic velocity uncertainties than any other, including accounting for temporal correlations in the GNSS data. The only way to improve future GNSS velocity estimates is to severely limit manmade displacements at the tracking stations.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/gji/ggv455</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-540X
ispartof Geophysical journal international, 2016-01, Vol.204 (1), p.480-487
issn 0956-540X
1365-246X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_gji_ggv455
source Oxford Open
title Impacts of GNSS position offsets on global frame stability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A59%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20GNSS%20position%20offsets%20on%20global%20frame%20stability&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20journal%20international&rft.au=Griffiths,%20J.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=204&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=480&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=480-487&rft.issn=0956-540X&rft.eissn=1365-246X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gji/ggv455&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/gji/ggv455%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a320t-8969b0e6664b9389cbafc42a0c69b4aca7a7aaf5ad9b507d749039a0bbe673323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/gji/ggv455&rfr_iscdi=true