Loading…

Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991

Four conventional insecticides and a single formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis were evaluated for efficacy against ECB and CEW. Sweet corn was planted 3 Jul at the University of Illinois Vegetable Crops Farm, Champaign. Plant spacing was 30 inches with 26,100 plants per acre. Plots consisted of 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Insecticide and acaricide tests 1992-01, Vol.17 (1), p.107-107
Main Authors: Oloumi-Sadeghi, H., Royer, T. A., Randell, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Insecticide and acaricide tests
container_volume 17
creator Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.
Royer, T. A.
Randell, R.
description Four conventional insecticides and a single formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis were evaluated for efficacy against ECB and CEW. Sweet corn was planted 3 Jul at the University of Illinois Vegetable Crops Farm, Champaign. Plant spacing was 30 inches with 26,100 plants per acre. Plots consisted of 2 rows × 50 ft, with 25-ft alley ways between each replication. The design was a complete randomized block with 4 replications. Insecticide applications were made to the 2 middle rows of each plot. Applications were made on 28 and 31 Aug and 3, 6, and 9 Sep (corresponding to 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after the first appearance of silks). Insecticide applications were made with a modified John Deere 6000 (HCV). A 10-ft boom equipped with Conejet TXSS12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row on 30-inch drop pipes) was mounted on the rear of the HCV. Sprays were directed at the ear zone of plants. Treatments were applied with a compressed-air system calibrated to deliver 30 gal/acre at 60 psi. Twenty-five ears were collected from the 2 middle rows in each plot on 12 Sep. Each ear was examined for damage and classified as (1) no insect damage, (2) damage only on the tip, (3) damage only on the side, and (4) tip damage extending at least 1.5 inches to the side or both tip and side damage. The number of ECB and CEW on or in the ear was also recorded.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/iat/17.1.107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_iat_17_1_107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_iat_17_1_107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757-b42089d752b6c3136f118a32fcbb6b68658c3431aaf69f55e2da5ac286f4350c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFqAyEYhD200JDm1gfwAbKJv666HktI20BKDw30KOoqWLZadGnJ29fQnIaPYYZhEHoAsgGi2DaaeQtyA43kDVoQKkXHBBd3aFXrJyGEEkXEQBboYx9CdMadcQ54l9OPT3PMyUzYpBG_RleyjY0OqXo3RxdHX3HIBb__ej-3RElX75KeS57WGJSCe3QbzFT96qpLdHran3Yv3fHt-bB7PHZOctnZnpJBjZJTKxwDJgLAYBgNzlphxSD44FjPwJggVODc09Fw4-ggQs84cWyJ1v-1bWetxQf9XeKXKWcNRF-u0O0KDVJDI8n-AOa7UuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991</title><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. ; Royer, T. A. ; Randell, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. ; Royer, T. A. ; Randell, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Four conventional insecticides and a single formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis were evaluated for efficacy against ECB and CEW. Sweet corn was planted 3 Jul at the University of Illinois Vegetable Crops Farm, Champaign. Plant spacing was 30 inches with 26,100 plants per acre. Plots consisted of 2 rows × 50 ft, with 25-ft alley ways between each replication. The design was a complete randomized block with 4 replications. Insecticide applications were made to the 2 middle rows of each plot. Applications were made on 28 and 31 Aug and 3, 6, and 9 Sep (corresponding to 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after the first appearance of silks). Insecticide applications were made with a modified John Deere 6000 (HCV). A 10-ft boom equipped with Conejet TXSS12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row on 30-inch drop pipes) was mounted on the rear of the HCV. Sprays were directed at the ear zone of plants. Treatments were applied with a compressed-air system calibrated to deliver 30 gal/acre at 60 psi. Twenty-five ears were collected from the 2 middle rows in each plot on 12 Sep. Each ear was examined for damage and classified as (1) no insect damage, (2) damage only on the tip, (3) damage only on the side, and (4) tip damage extending at least 1.5 inches to the side or both tip and side damage. The number of ECB and CEW on or in the ear was also recorded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-3656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/iat/17.1.107</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Insecticide and acaricide tests, 1992-01, Vol.17 (1), p.107-107</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royer, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991</title><title>Insecticide and acaricide tests</title><description>Four conventional insecticides and a single formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis were evaluated for efficacy against ECB and CEW. Sweet corn was planted 3 Jul at the University of Illinois Vegetable Crops Farm, Champaign. Plant spacing was 30 inches with 26,100 plants per acre. Plots consisted of 2 rows × 50 ft, with 25-ft alley ways between each replication. The design was a complete randomized block with 4 replications. Insecticide applications were made to the 2 middle rows of each plot. Applications were made on 28 and 31 Aug and 3, 6, and 9 Sep (corresponding to 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after the first appearance of silks). Insecticide applications were made with a modified John Deere 6000 (HCV). A 10-ft boom equipped with Conejet TXSS12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row on 30-inch drop pipes) was mounted on the rear of the HCV. Sprays were directed at the ear zone of plants. Treatments were applied with a compressed-air system calibrated to deliver 30 gal/acre at 60 psi. Twenty-five ears were collected from the 2 middle rows in each plot on 12 Sep. Each ear was examined for damage and classified as (1) no insect damage, (2) damage only on the tip, (3) damage only on the side, and (4) tip damage extending at least 1.5 inches to the side or both tip and side damage. The number of ECB and CEW on or in the ear was also recorded.</description><issn>0276-3656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMFqAyEYhD200JDm1gfwAbKJv666HktI20BKDw30KOoqWLZadGnJ29fQnIaPYYZhEHoAsgGi2DaaeQtyA43kDVoQKkXHBBd3aFXrJyGEEkXEQBboYx9CdMadcQ54l9OPT3PMyUzYpBG_RleyjY0OqXo3RxdHX3HIBb__ej-3RElX75KeS57WGJSCe3QbzFT96qpLdHran3Yv3fHt-bB7PHZOctnZnpJBjZJTKxwDJgLAYBgNzlphxSD44FjPwJggVODc09Fw4-ggQs84cWyJ1v-1bWetxQf9XeKXKWcNRF-u0O0KDVJDI8n-AOa7UuU</recordid><startdate>19920101</startdate><enddate>19920101</enddate><creator>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.</creator><creator>Royer, T. A.</creator><creator>Randell, R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920101</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991</title><author>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. ; Royer, T. A. ; Randell, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757-b42089d752b6c3136f118a32fcbb6b68658c3431aaf69f55e2da5ac286f4350c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royer, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Insecticide and acaricide tests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.</au><au>Royer, T. A.</au><au>Randell, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991</atitle><jtitle>Insecticide and acaricide tests</jtitle><date>1992-01-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>107-107</pages><issn>0276-3656</issn><abstract>Four conventional insecticides and a single formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis were evaluated for efficacy against ECB and CEW. Sweet corn was planted 3 Jul at the University of Illinois Vegetable Crops Farm, Champaign. Plant spacing was 30 inches with 26,100 plants per acre. Plots consisted of 2 rows × 50 ft, with 25-ft alley ways between each replication. The design was a complete randomized block with 4 replications. Insecticide applications were made to the 2 middle rows of each plot. Applications were made on 28 and 31 Aug and 3, 6, and 9 Sep (corresponding to 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after the first appearance of silks). Insecticide applications were made with a modified John Deere 6000 (HCV). A 10-ft boom equipped with Conejet TXSS12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row on 30-inch drop pipes) was mounted on the rear of the HCV. Sprays were directed at the ear zone of plants. Treatments were applied with a compressed-air system calibrated to deliver 30 gal/acre at 60 psi. Twenty-five ears were collected from the 2 middle rows in each plot on 12 Sep. Each ear was examined for damage and classified as (1) no insect damage, (2) damage only on the tip, (3) damage only on the side, and (4) tip damage extending at least 1.5 inches to the side or both tip and side damage. The number of ECB and CEW on or in the ear was also recorded.</abstract><doi>10.1093/iat/17.1.107</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-3656
ispartof Insecticide and acaricide tests, 1992-01, Vol.17 (1), p.107-107
issn 0276-3656
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_iat_17_1_107
source Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
title Efficacy of Conventional and Microbial Insecticides for Sweet Corn Insect Control, 1991
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A46%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Conventional%20and%20Microbial%20Insecticides%20for%20Sweet%20Corn%20Insect%20Control,%201991&rft.jtitle=Insecticide%20and%20acaricide%20tests&rft.au=Oloumi-Sadeghi,%20H.&rft.date=1992-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=107-107&rft.issn=0276-3656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/iat/17.1.107&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_iat_17_1_107%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757-b42089d752b6c3136f118a32fcbb6b68658c3431aaf69f55e2da5ac286f4350c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true