Subtypes of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Southeast Asia

The prevalences of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) subtypes in Thais, Cambodians, and Vietnamese were compared with the prevalences in Americans residing in Southeast Asia. HBs Ag was found with approximately equal frequency in Thai (43%) and American (39%) patients with hepatitis. However, hig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of infectious diseases 1975-06, Vol.131 (6), p.708-711
Main Authors: Snitbhan, Rapin, Scott, Robert McNair, Bancroft, William H., Top, Franklin H., Chiewsilp, Dumrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Antigens
Blood donation
Cambodia
Carrier State
Epitopes
Geographical distribution
Hepatitis
Hepatitis antigens
Hepatitis B - epidemiology
Hepatitis B - immunology
Hepatitis B Antigens - analysis
Hepatitis B Antigens - classification
Hepatitis B virus
Immune Sera
Immunodiffusion
Rabbits - immunology
Sex workers
Thailand
United States - ethnology
Urban populations
Vietnam
Virology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The prevalences of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) subtypes in Thais, Cambodians, and Vietnamese were compared with the prevalences in Americans residing in Southeast Asia. HBs Ag was found with approximately equal frequency in Thai (43%) and American (39%) patients with hepatitis. However, higher prevalences of HRs Ag were found in asymptomatic Thais (9.5%), Cambodians (11.9%), and Vietnamese (14.3%) than in asymptomatic Americans (0.7%). Among asymptomatic Thais, the ratio of HR s Ag/adr to HBs Ag/adw was approximately 10:1, with one exception: adw was not detected in a rural population of northern Thailand. The y determinant was not found in Thais. In contrast, both d and y determinants were found in Americans. These observations conform to a geographic pattern, with ad as the predominant combination in the Far East. In Southeast Asia determinants wand r are more useful epidemiologic markers than y and d.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/131.6.708