Loading…

Modification of AOAC method 973.31 for determination of nitrite in cured meats

A modification of AOAC Method 973.31 is proposed to improve the extraction efficiency of nitrite from cured meat samples and its subsequent quantification based on the diazotization-coupling reaction of sulfanilamide with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NED). The various experimental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of AOAC International 2008-07, Vol.91 (4), p.820-825
Main Authors: Mohamed, Ashraf A, Mubarak, Ahmed T, Fawy, Khaled F, El-Shahat, Mohamed F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A modification of AOAC Method 973.31 is proposed to improve the extraction efficiency of nitrite from cured meat samples and its subsequent quantification based on the diazotization-coupling reaction of sulfanilamide with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NED). The various experimental parameters were thoroughly investigated. A 5 g meat sample was mixed with 400 mL water; the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 5.5 +/- 0.3 and allowed to stand for 2 h on a water bath at 80 degrees C, with occasional shaking for the complete extraction of nitrite. After quantitative filtration, an aliquot was mixed with chloroacetic-chloroacetate buffer, pH 1.80 +/- 0.05, sulfanilamide, and NED, and the absorbance of the resulting azodye was recorded at 540 nm against water as a reference. Following the recommended procedure, a linear calibration graph was obtained for up to 0.8 [micro]g/mL NO2-, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9996 and a detection limit (based on the 3 Sb-criterion) of 5.6 ng/mL NO2-. The proposed method was conveniently applied to various cured meat samples and was validated by comparison with the original AOAC method and by recovery experiments that gave quantitative results (94-98%) with convenient reproducibility. Statistical analysis of the analytical data could not detect any systematic error and revealed the high accuracy and precision of the proposed method.
ISSN:1060-3271
1944-7922
DOI:10.1093/jaoac/91.4.820