Loading…

A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms

The effects of geographic distance and technological distance on knowledge spillovers have been well acknowledged in the literature, but the two distances were mostly discussed in parallel. Taking advantage of the context of multilocation firms in technology clusters, we consider the joint role of g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic geography 2018-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1091-1120
Main Authors: Wang, Shixiang, Zhao, Minyuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3
container_end_page 1120
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1091
container_title Journal of economic geography
container_volume 18
creator Wang, Shixiang
Zhao, Minyuan
description The effects of geographic distance and technological distance on knowledge spillovers have been well acknowledged in the literature, but the two distances were mostly discussed in parallel. Taking advantage of the context of multilocation firms in technology clusters, we consider the joint role of geographic and technological distances by focusing on a salient feature of clusters: firms’ concern about knowledge appropriation. Specifically, we analyze how a firm’s choice of technological distance from local entities is affected by the competitive environment in the cluster as well as its intra-firm technological structure across clusters. Empirical findings based on the global semiconductors industry support our theory that, with stronger local competition, an innovating entity will increase its technological distance from neighbors to reduce unintended knowledge spillovers. However, the technological distance is smaller when the entity is part of a multilocation firm, has a larger technological distance from other locations within the firm and has stronger intra-firm integration across locations. We argue that these features limit knowledge spillovers and, hence, reduce firms’ reliance on technological distance as a strategy for knowledge appropriation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jeg/lby042
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jeg_lby042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26530603</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/jeg/lby042</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26530603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jz1LBDEURYMouK42NlbCNDbCuO8l2UxSLotfsGCjdXgzSWSH0SxJRPbfOzKypdW9xeFyD2OXCHcIRix6_74Y2j1IfsRmKJWueYNwfOjAT9lZzj0AKrmUM3a1qgoNvoqhKt-xcttc6LPz-ZydBBqyv_jLOXt7uH9dP9Wbl8fn9WpTdxJlqb0DLZ0wqLHRUrUKFDhC0ZAyzmjjgZwTsuPkiWsHIqAijdCGsbXciTm7nXa7FHNOPthd2n5Q2lsE-6tkRyU7KY3wzQTHr93_3PXE9bnEdCC5WorxnxA_geJT2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Wang, Shixiang ; Zhao, Minyuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shixiang ; Zhao, Minyuan</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of geographic distance and technological distance on knowledge spillovers have been well acknowledged in the literature, but the two distances were mostly discussed in parallel. Taking advantage of the context of multilocation firms in technology clusters, we consider the joint role of geographic and technological distances by focusing on a salient feature of clusters: firms’ concern about knowledge appropriation. Specifically, we analyze how a firm’s choice of technological distance from local entities is affected by the competitive environment in the cluster as well as its intra-firm technological structure across clusters. Empirical findings based on the global semiconductors industry support our theory that, with stronger local competition, an innovating entity will increase its technological distance from neighbors to reduce unintended knowledge spillovers. However, the technological distance is smaller when the entity is part of a multilocation firm, has a larger technological distance from other locations within the firm and has stronger intra-firm integration across locations. We argue that these features limit knowledge spillovers and, hence, reduce firms’ reliance on technological distance as a strategy for knowledge appropriation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lby042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of economic geography, 2018-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1091-1120</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2018)</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26530603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26530603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Minyuan</creatorcontrib><title>A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms</title><title>Journal of economic geography</title><description>The effects of geographic distance and technological distance on knowledge spillovers have been well acknowledged in the literature, but the two distances were mostly discussed in parallel. Taking advantage of the context of multilocation firms in technology clusters, we consider the joint role of geographic and technological distances by focusing on a salient feature of clusters: firms’ concern about knowledge appropriation. Specifically, we analyze how a firm’s choice of technological distance from local entities is affected by the competitive environment in the cluster as well as its intra-firm technological structure across clusters. Empirical findings based on the global semiconductors industry support our theory that, with stronger local competition, an innovating entity will increase its technological distance from neighbors to reduce unintended knowledge spillovers. However, the technological distance is smaller when the entity is part of a multilocation firm, has a larger technological distance from other locations within the firm and has stronger intra-firm integration across locations. We argue that these features limit knowledge spillovers and, hence, reduce firms’ reliance on technological distance as a strategy for knowledge appropriation.</description><issn>1468-2702</issn><issn>1468-2710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jz1LBDEURYMouK42NlbCNDbCuO8l2UxSLotfsGCjdXgzSWSH0SxJRPbfOzKypdW9xeFyD2OXCHcIRix6_74Y2j1IfsRmKJWueYNwfOjAT9lZzj0AKrmUM3a1qgoNvoqhKt-xcttc6LPz-ZydBBqyv_jLOXt7uH9dP9Wbl8fn9WpTdxJlqb0DLZ0wqLHRUrUKFDhC0ZAyzmjjgZwTsuPkiWsHIqAijdCGsbXciTm7nXa7FHNOPthd2n5Q2lsE-6tkRyU7KY3wzQTHr93_3PXE9bnEdCC5WorxnxA_geJT2Q</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Wang, Shixiang</creator><creator>Zhao, Minyuan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>A tale of two distances</title><author>Wang, Shixiang ; Zhao, Minyuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Minyuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Shixiang</au><au>Zhao, Minyuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic geography</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1091-1120</pages><issn>1468-2702</issn><eissn>1468-2710</eissn><abstract>The effects of geographic distance and technological distance on knowledge spillovers have been well acknowledged in the literature, but the two distances were mostly discussed in parallel. Taking advantage of the context of multilocation firms in technology clusters, we consider the joint role of geographic and technological distances by focusing on a salient feature of clusters: firms’ concern about knowledge appropriation. Specifically, we analyze how a firm’s choice of technological distance from local entities is affected by the competitive environment in the cluster as well as its intra-firm technological structure across clusters. Empirical findings based on the global semiconductors industry support our theory that, with stronger local competition, an innovating entity will increase its technological distance from neighbors to reduce unintended knowledge spillovers. However, the technological distance is smaller when the entity is part of a multilocation firm, has a larger technological distance from other locations within the firm and has stronger intra-firm integration across locations. We argue that these features limit knowledge spillovers and, hence, reduce firms’ reliance on technological distance as a strategy for knowledge appropriation.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jeg/lby042</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1468-2702
ispartof Journal of economic geography, 2018-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1091-1120
issn 1468-2702
1468-2710
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jeg_lby042
source EconLit s plnými texty; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online
title A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A26%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tale%20of%20two%20distances:%20a%20study%20of%20technological%20distance,%20geographic%20distance%20and%20multilocation%20firms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20geography&rft.au=Wang,%20Shixiang&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1091-1120&rft.issn=1468-2702&rft.eissn=1468-2710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jeg/lby042&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26530603%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ed084d391817846b6060da137a69d989e0add34c2aea28d03f16a810bf3f1b2d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26530603&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jeg/lby042&rfr_iscdi=true