Loading…

Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power

Abstract In this article we question the wisdom of limited liability for all equity holders in the case of banks and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), though our proposals could be extended to all public limited companies. Limited liability can be a major source of moral hazard...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of financial regulation 2020-03, Vol.6 (1), p.1-40
Main Authors: Goodhart, C A E, Lastra, R M
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-b7eb376356bf0031eb5130c2e7827b627d6c7dae0b06fcaae5de11efc65b11723
cites
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of financial regulation
container_volume 6
creator Goodhart, C A E
Lastra, R M
description Abstract In this article we question the wisdom of limited liability for all equity holders in the case of banks and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), though our proposals could be extended to all public limited companies. Limited liability can be a major source of moral hazard and excessive risk taking—a privilege that allows shareholders to enjoy the upside from their commercial activity while limiting their exposure in the event of failure. We propose that there should be two different classes of equity for banks and SIFIs. The division should be between outsiders, with no inside knowledge of the working of the firm and/or ability to control its decisions, and insiders, who have both the information and capacity to influence corporate decision-making. Outsiders would remain with limited liability, while multiple liability (double, triple, and potentially unlimited) would apply to insiders. The purpose of our proposal is to shift the costs of failure back to those who have responsibility for taking these decisions. The idea of financial liability ‘with teeth’—which is rooted in history—provides an innovative solution that improves the incentives for managers to take responsible decisions, and promotes a radical change in the structure of capitalism—addressing the unfairness of the current system which has enhanced inequality and encouraged populism.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jfr/fjz010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jfr_fjz010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jfr/fjz010</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jfr/fjz010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-b7eb376356bf0031eb5130c2e7827b627d6c7dae0b06fcaae5de11efc65b11723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j0FLwzAYhoMoOLZd_AW9eFHqvq9pkupNxqaDih70XJL0i6bMdiYdsv16N-rBk6f3hffhhYexC4QbhFs-a1yYuWYPCCdslIHgaV7kePqnn7NpjA0AoFB5wWHErhdfW9_vkqVvdWvpLnnSvf3w7XtSem38-rj1XfLSfVOYsDOn15Gmvzlmb8vF6_wxLZ8fVvP7MrVc5H1qFBmuJBfSOACOZARysBmpIlNGZqqWVtWawIB0VmsSNSGSs1IYRJXxMbsafm3oYgzkqk3wnzrsKoTqaFodTKvB9ABfDnC33fzH_QAQ2FMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Goodhart, C A E ; Lastra, R M</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodhart, C A E ; Lastra, R M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In this article we question the wisdom of limited liability for all equity holders in the case of banks and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), though our proposals could be extended to all public limited companies. Limited liability can be a major source of moral hazard and excessive risk taking—a privilege that allows shareholders to enjoy the upside from their commercial activity while limiting their exposure in the event of failure. We propose that there should be two different classes of equity for banks and SIFIs. The division should be between outsiders, with no inside knowledge of the working of the firm and/or ability to control its decisions, and insiders, who have both the information and capacity to influence corporate decision-making. Outsiders would remain with limited liability, while multiple liability (double, triple, and potentially unlimited) would apply to insiders. The purpose of our proposal is to shift the costs of failure back to those who have responsibility for taking these decisions. The idea of financial liability ‘with teeth’—which is rooted in history—provides an innovative solution that improves the incentives for managers to take responsible decisions, and promotes a radical change in the structure of capitalism—addressing the unfairness of the current system which has enhanced inequality and encouraged populism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-4841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-4841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jfr/fjz010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of financial regulation, 2020-03, Vol.6 (1), p.1-40</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-b7eb376356bf0031eb5130c2e7827b627d6c7dae0b06fcaae5de11efc65b11723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodhart, C A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lastra, R M</creatorcontrib><title>Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power</title><title>Journal of financial regulation</title><description>Abstract In this article we question the wisdom of limited liability for all equity holders in the case of banks and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), though our proposals could be extended to all public limited companies. Limited liability can be a major source of moral hazard and excessive risk taking—a privilege that allows shareholders to enjoy the upside from their commercial activity while limiting their exposure in the event of failure. We propose that there should be two different classes of equity for banks and SIFIs. The division should be between outsiders, with no inside knowledge of the working of the firm and/or ability to control its decisions, and insiders, who have both the information and capacity to influence corporate decision-making. Outsiders would remain with limited liability, while multiple liability (double, triple, and potentially unlimited) would apply to insiders. The purpose of our proposal is to shift the costs of failure back to those who have responsibility for taking these decisions. The idea of financial liability ‘with teeth’—which is rooted in history—provides an innovative solution that improves the incentives for managers to take responsible decisions, and promotes a radical change in the structure of capitalism—addressing the unfairness of the current system which has enhanced inequality and encouraged populism.</description><issn>2053-4841</issn><issn>2053-4841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j0FLwzAYhoMoOLZd_AW9eFHqvq9pkupNxqaDih70XJL0i6bMdiYdsv16N-rBk6f3hffhhYexC4QbhFs-a1yYuWYPCCdslIHgaV7kePqnn7NpjA0AoFB5wWHErhdfW9_vkqVvdWvpLnnSvf3w7XtSem38-rj1XfLSfVOYsDOn15Gmvzlmb8vF6_wxLZ8fVvP7MrVc5H1qFBmuJBfSOACOZARysBmpIlNGZqqWVtWawIB0VmsSNSGSs1IYRJXxMbsafm3oYgzkqk3wnzrsKoTqaFodTKvB9ABfDnC33fzH_QAQ2FMg</recordid><startdate>20200320</startdate><enddate>20200320</enddate><creator>Goodhart, C A E</creator><creator>Lastra, R M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200320</creationdate><title>Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power</title><author>Goodhart, C A E ; Lastra, R M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-b7eb376356bf0031eb5130c2e7827b627d6c7dae0b06fcaae5de11efc65b11723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodhart, C A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lastra, R M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodhart, C A E</au><au>Lastra, R M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial regulation</jtitle><date>2020-03-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>1-40</pages><issn>2053-4841</issn><eissn>2053-4841</eissn><abstract>Abstract In this article we question the wisdom of limited liability for all equity holders in the case of banks and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), though our proposals could be extended to all public limited companies. Limited liability can be a major source of moral hazard and excessive risk taking—a privilege that allows shareholders to enjoy the upside from their commercial activity while limiting their exposure in the event of failure. We propose that there should be two different classes of equity for banks and SIFIs. The division should be between outsiders, with no inside knowledge of the working of the firm and/or ability to control its decisions, and insiders, who have both the information and capacity to influence corporate decision-making. Outsiders would remain with limited liability, while multiple liability (double, triple, and potentially unlimited) would apply to insiders. The purpose of our proposal is to shift the costs of failure back to those who have responsibility for taking these decisions. The idea of financial liability ‘with teeth’—which is rooted in history—provides an innovative solution that improves the incentives for managers to take responsible decisions, and promotes a radical change in the structure of capitalism—addressing the unfairness of the current system which has enhanced inequality and encouraged populism.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jfr/fjz010</doi><tpages>40</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2053-4841
ispartof Journal of financial regulation, 2020-03, Vol.6 (1), p.1-40
issn 2053-4841
2053-4841
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jfr_fjz010
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Oxford Journals Online
title Equity Finance: Matching Liability to Power
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A00%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equity%20Finance:%20Matching%20Liability%20to%20Power&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20regulation&rft.au=Goodhart,%20C%20A%20E&rft.date=2020-03-20&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=1-40&rft.issn=2053-4841&rft.eissn=2053-4841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jfr/fjz010&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jfr/fjz010%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-b7eb376356bf0031eb5130c2e7827b627d6c7dae0b06fcaae5de11efc65b11723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jfr/fjz010&rfr_iscdi=true