Loading…

Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations

ABSTRACT This article investigates the potential of global value chain (GVC)-orientated sustainability provisions in regional and bilateral trade agreements (FTAs). Such provisions impose social and environmental obligations directly onto GVCs, as opposed to creating obligations for governments. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international economic law 2023-06, Vol.26 (2), p.199-215
Main Author: Harrison, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-34672f78ca19f9b50b7acf470b9b34e3d068abac57c93c6e5f66a021a8121f103
cites
container_end_page 215
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Journal of international economic law
container_volume 26
creator Harrison, James
description ABSTRACT This article investigates the potential of global value chain (GVC)-orientated sustainability provisions in regional and bilateral trade agreements (FTAs). Such provisions impose social and environmental obligations directly onto GVCs, as opposed to creating obligations for governments. The theoretical potential of GVC provisions is examined, and the concepts of effectiveness and legitimacy are introduced as values by which to assess them. Four recent sets of provisions are then scrutinized. These are (i) palm oil sustainability standards from the Indonesia–European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Comprehensive Economic Partnerhsip Agreement (CEPA) FTA, (ii) hen welfare standards in the European Union–Mercosur Association Agreement, (iii) a stipulation of a minimum average wage for the automobile industry in the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and (iv) enforcement of collective bargaining and freedom of association directly against factories, also in the USMCA. All of these provisions are found to have significant deficiencies. At the same time, it is argued that three different governance models underpin them, namely (i) third-party certification schemes, (ii) domestic regulations of one of the parties, and (iii) bespoke arrangements created for the FTA in question. The article therefore considers the potential and drawbacks of each governance model in terms of their effectiveness and legitimacy, as well as alternative and complementary commitments including unilateral measures and subject-specific trade agreements.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jiel/jgac057
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jiel_jgac057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230620090396</informt_id><oup_id>10.1093/jiel/jgac057</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jiel/jgac057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-34672f78ca19f9b50b7acf470b9b34e3d068abac57c93c6e5f66a021a8121f103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOKd3PkDuVLDupGnT1bsx5iYMJjh3G07TpMvompFk4N7ezs1br87P4TvfgT-K7im8UCjYYGNUM9jUKCHLL6IeTXkaszwbXnaZ8SJmwNLr6Mb7DQDNU0p7UbV0WCkyqp1SW9UGT7CtyOfeBzQtlqYx4fBKJt-7xjrT1iSsFfmwoSMNNsRqMm1s2aUVNntFxuvuijxOV-MnsigbU2MwtvW30ZXGxqu78-xHX2-T5XgWzxfT9_FoHsuUQ4hZyvNE50OJtNBFmUGZo9RpDmVRslSxCvgQS5RZLgsmuco05wgJxSFNqKbA-tHzySud9d4pLXbObNEdBAVxbEgcGxLnhjp8dsLd1gSBtfG7ILxCJ9fCtNr-rq2rRWXN0cAY5X9YAgkDngAUwAreqR5OKrvf_f_0B0y2gVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Lexis+ UK</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Harrison, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This article investigates the potential of global value chain (GVC)-orientated sustainability provisions in regional and bilateral trade agreements (FTAs). Such provisions impose social and environmental obligations directly onto GVCs, as opposed to creating obligations for governments. The theoretical potential of GVC provisions is examined, and the concepts of effectiveness and legitimacy are introduced as values by which to assess them. Four recent sets of provisions are then scrutinized. These are (i) palm oil sustainability standards from the Indonesia–European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Comprehensive Economic Partnerhsip Agreement (CEPA) FTA, (ii) hen welfare standards in the European Union–Mercosur Association Agreement, (iii) a stipulation of a minimum average wage for the automobile industry in the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and (iv) enforcement of collective bargaining and freedom of association directly against factories, also in the USMCA. All of these provisions are found to have significant deficiencies. At the same time, it is argued that three different governance models underpin them, namely (i) third-party certification schemes, (ii) domestic regulations of one of the parties, and (iii) bespoke arrangements created for the FTA in question. The article therefore considers the potential and drawbacks of each governance model in terms of their effectiveness and legitimacy, as well as alternative and complementary commitments including unilateral measures and subject-specific trade agreements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-3034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgac057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Collective bargaining ; Environmental law ; Freedom of association ; Sustainable development ; Treaties ; World Trade Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of international economic law, 2023-06, Vol.26 (2), p.199-215</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-34672f78ca19f9b50b7acf470b9b34e3d068abac57c93c6e5f66a021a8121f103</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><title>Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations</title><title>Journal of international economic law</title><description>ABSTRACT This article investigates the potential of global value chain (GVC)-orientated sustainability provisions in regional and bilateral trade agreements (FTAs). Such provisions impose social and environmental obligations directly onto GVCs, as opposed to creating obligations for governments. The theoretical potential of GVC provisions is examined, and the concepts of effectiveness and legitimacy are introduced as values by which to assess them. Four recent sets of provisions are then scrutinized. These are (i) palm oil sustainability standards from the Indonesia–European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Comprehensive Economic Partnerhsip Agreement (CEPA) FTA, (ii) hen welfare standards in the European Union–Mercosur Association Agreement, (iii) a stipulation of a minimum average wage for the automobile industry in the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and (iv) enforcement of collective bargaining and freedom of association directly against factories, also in the USMCA. All of these provisions are found to have significant deficiencies. At the same time, it is argued that three different governance models underpin them, namely (i) third-party certification schemes, (ii) domestic regulations of one of the parties, and (iii) bespoke arrangements created for the FTA in question. The article therefore considers the potential and drawbacks of each governance model in terms of their effectiveness and legitimacy, as well as alternative and complementary commitments including unilateral measures and subject-specific trade agreements.</description><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Freedom of association</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>World Trade Organization</subject><issn>1369-3034</issn><issn>1464-3758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOKd3PkDuVLDupGnT1bsx5iYMJjh3G07TpMvompFk4N7ezs1br87P4TvfgT-K7im8UCjYYGNUM9jUKCHLL6IeTXkaszwbXnaZ8SJmwNLr6Mb7DQDNU0p7UbV0WCkyqp1SW9UGT7CtyOfeBzQtlqYx4fBKJt-7xjrT1iSsFfmwoSMNNsRqMm1s2aUVNntFxuvuijxOV-MnsigbU2MwtvW30ZXGxqu78-xHX2-T5XgWzxfT9_FoHsuUQ4hZyvNE50OJtNBFmUGZo9RpDmVRslSxCvgQS5RZLgsmuco05wgJxSFNqKbA-tHzySud9d4pLXbObNEdBAVxbEgcGxLnhjp8dsLd1gSBtfG7ILxCJ9fCtNr-rq2rRWXN0cAY5X9YAgkDngAUwAreqR5OKrvf_f_0B0y2gVc</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Harrison, James</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations</title><author>Harrison, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-34672f78ca19f9b50b7acf470b9b34e3d068abac57c93c6e5f66a021a8121f103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Freedom of association</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>World Trade Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>199-215</pages><issn>1369-3034</issn><eissn>1464-3758</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT This article investigates the potential of global value chain (GVC)-orientated sustainability provisions in regional and bilateral trade agreements (FTAs). Such provisions impose social and environmental obligations directly onto GVCs, as opposed to creating obligations for governments. The theoretical potential of GVC provisions is examined, and the concepts of effectiveness and legitimacy are introduced as values by which to assess them. Four recent sets of provisions are then scrutinized. These are (i) palm oil sustainability standards from the Indonesia–European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Comprehensive Economic Partnerhsip Agreement (CEPA) FTA, (ii) hen welfare standards in the European Union–Mercosur Association Agreement, (iii) a stipulation of a minimum average wage for the automobile industry in the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and (iv) enforcement of collective bargaining and freedom of association directly against factories, also in the USMCA. All of these provisions are found to have significant deficiencies. At the same time, it is argued that three different governance models underpin them, namely (i) third-party certification schemes, (ii) domestic regulations of one of the parties, and (iii) bespoke arrangements created for the FTA in question. The article therefore considers the potential and drawbacks of each governance model in terms of their effectiveness and legitimacy, as well as alternative and complementary commitments including unilateral measures and subject-specific trade agreements.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jiel/jgac057</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-3034
ispartof Journal of international economic law, 2023-06, Vol.26 (2), p.199-215
issn 1369-3034
1464-3758
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jiel_jgac057
source EconLit s plnými texty; Lexis+ UK; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Collective bargaining
Environmental law
Freedom of association
Sustainable development
Treaties
World Trade Organization
title Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade%20Agreements%20and%20Sustainability:%20Exploring%20the%20Potential%20of%20Global%20Value%20Chain%20(GVC)%20Obligations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20economic%20law&rft.au=Harrison,%20James&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=199-215&rft.issn=1369-3034&rft.eissn=1464-3758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jiel/jgac057&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jiel/jgac057%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-34672f78ca19f9b50b7acf470b9b34e3d068abac57c93c6e5f66a021a8121f103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230620090396&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jiel/jgac057&rfr_iscdi=true