Cranial variation in the Altai weasel Mustela altaica (Carnivora: Mustelidae) and its possible taxonomic implications

The Altai weasel, Mustela altaicaPallas 1811 (Carnivora: Mustelidae), is widely distributed across open landscapes of central and eastern Asia. The geographical variation in skull morphology and taxonomic composition of this small mustelid remain poorly known. Based on extensive sampling in museum c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mammalogy 2021-12, Vol.102 (6), p.1605-1618
Main Authors: Abramov, Alexei V, Puzachenko, Andrey Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Feature Articles
geographical variation
Mustela altaica
skull
subspecies
taxonomy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Altai weasel, Mustela altaicaPallas 1811 (Carnivora: Mustelidae), is widely distributed across open landscapes of central and eastern Asia. The geographical variation in skull morphology and taxonomic composition of this small mustelid remain poorly known. Based on extensive sampling in museum collections, we analyzed morphometric variation in 23 cranial characters of 232 M. altaica specimens from across its entire range. The multivariate analysis (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) revealed a geographical pattern of variation in cranial size and shape. Based on this result, two morphological groups have been comprehensively characterized. Weasels of the first group differ from those of the second in having larger skulls, wider neurocrania, elongated toothrows, and larger carnassial teeth, as well as in sexual size dimorphism. The first group is confined to the southwestern part of the species range (Tien Shan Mountains, Pamir, the Himalayas, and southern Tibet). The second group is widespread from the foothills of Tien Shan in the west to Khingan and Manchuria in the east. The distribution of the two groups of M. altaica is consistent with the “Out-of-Tibet” hypothesis. The first group presumably can be attributed to M. a. temonHodgson, 1857, whereas the second group can be treated as nominotypical M. a. altaicaPallas, 1811.
ISSN:0022-2372
1545-1542
DOI:10.1093/jmammal/gyab112