Loading…
Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin
Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of mammalogy 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793 |
container_end_page | 845 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 833 |
container_title | Journal of mammalogy |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Margenau, Lydia L S Russell, Robin E Hanrahan, Alexander T Roberts, Nathan M Price Tack, Jennifer L Storm, Daniel J |
description | Abstract
Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jmammal/gyad033 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyad033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01LxDAYhIMoWFfPXnMWYvPRmObgQRZdhQUPKh7L27epZGmb0rQL_fdWtncvMzDMDDyE3Ap-L7hV6aGFtoUm_Zmh4kqdkUToTLNF5DlJOJeSSWXkJbmK8cA510byhDx-TMPRH6Gh0FUUYYqOxd6hrz3SNgwjNH6caagphjmMLlLf0W8fMXTRd9fkooYmupvVN-Tr5flz-8r277u37dOeoRJmZJlGdErKEo0AB7VEm1mVaWesySsstZS6fHAaXA62UrkQJYhqyURdSjRWbUh6-sUhxDi4uugH38IwF4IXf_TFSl-s9Mvi7rQIU_9v-Rd3xGAf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J</creator><contributor>Smyser, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J ; Smyser, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Mammalogists 2023. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Smyser, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Nathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>Abstract
Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</description><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj01LxDAYhIMoWFfPXnMWYvPRmObgQRZdhQUPKh7L27epZGmb0rQL_fdWtncvMzDMDDyE3Ap-L7hV6aGFtoUm_Zmh4kqdkUToTLNF5DlJOJeSSWXkJbmK8cA510byhDx-TMPRH6Gh0FUUYYqOxd6hrz3SNgwjNH6caagphjmMLlLf0W8fMXTRd9fkooYmupvVN-Tr5flz-8r277u37dOeoRJmZJlGdErKEo0AB7VEm1mVaWesySsstZS6fHAaXA62UrkQJYhqyURdSjRWbUh6-sUhxDi4uugH38IwF4IXf_TFSl-s9Mvi7rQIU_9v-Rd3xGAf</recordid><startdate>20230803</startdate><enddate>20230803</enddate><creator>Margenau, Lydia L S</creator><creator>Russell, Robin E</creator><creator>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creator><creator>Roberts, Nathan M</creator><creator>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Storm, Daniel J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230803</creationdate><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><author>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Nathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margenau, Lydia L S</au><au>Russell, Robin E</au><au>Hanrahan, Alexander T</au><au>Roberts, Nathan M</au><au>Price Tack, Jennifer L</au><au>Storm, Daniel J</au><au>Smyser, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>2023-08-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>845</epage><pages>833-845</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2372 |
ispartof | Journal of mammalogy, 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845 |
issn | 0022-2372 1545-1542 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyad033 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
title | Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20cause-specific%20mortality%20of%20coyotes%20in%20Wisconsin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Margenau,%20Lydia%20L%20S&rft.date=2023-08-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=845&rft.pages=833-845&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyad033&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jmammal/gyad033%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jmammal/gyad033&rfr_iscdi=true |