Loading…

Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin

Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mammalogy 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845
Main Authors: Margenau, Lydia L S, Russell, Robin E, Hanrahan, Alexander T, Roberts, Nathan M, Price Tack, Jennifer L, Storm, Daniel J
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793
container_end_page 845
container_issue 4
container_start_page 833
container_title Journal of mammalogy
container_volume 104
creator Margenau, Lydia L S
Russell, Robin E
Hanrahan, Alexander T
Roberts, Nathan M
Price Tack, Jennifer L
Storm, Daniel J
description Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jmammal/gyad033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyad033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01LxDAYhIMoWFfPXnMWYvPRmObgQRZdhQUPKh7L27epZGmb0rQL_fdWtncvMzDMDDyE3Ap-L7hV6aGFtoUm_Zmh4kqdkUToTLNF5DlJOJeSSWXkJbmK8cA510byhDx-TMPRH6Gh0FUUYYqOxd6hrz3SNgwjNH6caagphjmMLlLf0W8fMXTRd9fkooYmupvVN-Tr5flz-8r277u37dOeoRJmZJlGdErKEo0AB7VEm1mVaWesySsstZS6fHAaXA62UrkQJYhqyURdSjRWbUh6-sUhxDi4uugH38IwF4IXf_TFSl-s9Mvi7rQIU_9v-Rd3xGAf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J</creator><contributor>Smyser, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J ; Smyser, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Mammalogists 2023. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Smyser, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Nathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</description><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj01LxDAYhIMoWFfPXnMWYvPRmObgQRZdhQUPKh7L27epZGmb0rQL_fdWtncvMzDMDDyE3Ap-L7hV6aGFtoUm_Zmh4kqdkUToTLNF5DlJOJeSSWXkJbmK8cA510byhDx-TMPRH6Gh0FUUYYqOxd6hrz3SNgwjNH6caagphjmMLlLf0W8fMXTRd9fkooYmupvVN-Tr5flz-8r277u37dOeoRJmZJlGdErKEo0AB7VEm1mVaWesySsstZS6fHAaXA62UrkQJYhqyURdSjRWbUh6-sUhxDi4uugH38IwF4IXf_TFSl-s9Mvi7rQIU_9v-Rd3xGAf</recordid><startdate>20230803</startdate><enddate>20230803</enddate><creator>Margenau, Lydia L S</creator><creator>Russell, Robin E</creator><creator>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creator><creator>Roberts, Nathan M</creator><creator>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Storm, Daniel J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230803</creationdate><title>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</title><author>Margenau, Lydia L S ; Russell, Robin E ; Hanrahan, Alexander T ; Roberts, Nathan M ; Price Tack, Jennifer L ; Storm, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margenau, Lydia L S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Alexander T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Nathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price Tack, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margenau, Lydia L S</au><au>Russell, Robin E</au><au>Hanrahan, Alexander T</au><au>Roberts, Nathan M</au><au>Price Tack, Jennifer L</au><au>Storm, Daniel J</au><au>Smyser, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>2023-08-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>845</epage><pages>833-845</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><abstract>Abstract Understanding the drivers of population dynamics informs management actions and assures the public that harvest activities are not detrimental to the long-term stability of wildlife populations. We examined the survival and cause-specific mortality of 66 adult coyotes (34 males, 32 females) using GPS radiotelemetry in southwestern Wisconsin during October 2016 to March 2020. We paired our study with a literature review of coyote survival and mortality across the United States and Canada, focusing on the geographical distribution of studies, demographic aspects of survival, and the level of exploitation by humans on coyote populations. In Wisconsin, annual survival did not differ between sexes or across years but did vary among seasons and social statuses. The relative risk for a coyote dying was higher during the winter compared to the summer. A transient coyote had a higher relative risk of mortality compared to a resident coyote. Mean annual survival probability (sexes combined) was higher for a year-long resident compared to a year-long transient. The predominant sources of known mortality (n = 37) were harvest (83.8%) and vehicle collisions (13.5%). For our literature review, we identified 56 studies estimating coyote survival or mortality from 1971 to 2021 spanning the geographic range of coyotes. We found no distinct temporal or regional patterns in survival probability or the proportion of human-induced mortality, although fewer studies originated from the northeast region of the United States. Additionally, we detected weak correlation between survival probability and proportion of human-induced mortality, suggesting coyote harvest may be compensatory. Although our findings indicate that the Wisconsin coyote population had relatively higher human-induced mortality than populations in other regions, these mortality rates appear to be sustainable for this population under current landscape and habitat conditions.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jmammal/gyad033</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-675X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2372
ispartof Journal of mammalogy, 2023-08, Vol.104 (4), p.833-845
issn 0022-2372
1545-1542
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyad033
source Oxford Journals Online
title Survival and cause-specific mortality of coyotes in Wisconsin
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20cause-specific%20mortality%20of%20coyotes%20in%20Wisconsin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Margenau,%20Lydia%20L%20S&rft.date=2023-08-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=845&rft.pages=833-845&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyad033&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/jmammal/gyad033%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-45cce322bc71aeaf2c949345e7978dcb5225b6e5ae8a9d3811ba1d25b1fb2c793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jmammal/gyad033&rfr_iscdi=true