Loading…
1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role...
Saved in:
Published in: | Open forum infectious diseases 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | Supplement_2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Open forum infectious diseases |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Prodanuk, Michael Timberlake, Kathryn E Koo, Alicia Chopra, Yogi Wall, Donna Science, Michelle |
description | Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role in reducing empiric intravenous antibiotic (EIA) use.
Methods
This retrospective review assessed the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis for patients < 18 years undergoing HSCT at a Canadian children’s hospital. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) during the pre-engraftment period comparing the pre-levofloxacin era (Jan 1, 2019–Jun 30, 2020) to the levofloxacin era (Jul 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Patients were excluded if they were receiving EIA at the time of transplant, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or if levofloxacin use was discordant with their era. Secondary outcomes included the number of positive blood cultures and clinical deterioration episodes (clinical change resulting in blood culture draw and initiation/change of EIA).
Results
Fifty-four of 152 patients (36.5%) and 55 of 147 patients (37.4%) were included in the pre-levofloxacin and levofloxacin eras respectively. The most common reasons for exclusion were EIA use at the time of transplant and levofloxacin use discordant with the patient's era (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1). Mean DOT/pre-engraftment days (%) were significantly lower in the levofloxacin era for piperacillin-tazobactam (53.3 vs. 38.3, p=0.004) and amikacin (1.7 vs. 0.1, p=0.03), while there was no significant difference for meropenem, vancomycin, or all other antibiotics combined. There was also no significant difference in the number of positive blood cultures (11 vs. 7, p=0.35) or clinical deterioration episodes (55 vs. 66, p=0.1).
Conclusion
Levofloxacin prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT reduced percent pre-engraftment days on piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, with no significant impact on the number of positive blood cultures or clinical deterioration episodes. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship activities through reduced use of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Disclosures
Kathryn E. Timberlake, PharmD, Avir Pharma: Advisor/Consultant |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ofid_ofad500_1497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1227-93d8153f30387358c08f5504bd65726bcaa1b3cdba418ad54ee33830d50e0ede3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EElXpAdj5AKTYcZw4y6oqUKkSCNp15DgT1SixLdut2kNwZxK1C5ZsZkZ__v-Lh9AjJXNKSvZsW90MQzacDEpWFjdokrJUJKLkxe2f-x7NQvgmhFBKOCnKCfqheZ7N8XYPeN07qSK2Ld7A0badPUmlDf7w1u3PnTzpgK3Bq95prxVem-jlEYw9BLwwUdfaxkHeBcBjCBot4-h7g15G66yG8f0VocdL6Dq89dIE10kT8Sco7TSYGB7QXSu7ALPrnqLdy2q7fEs276_r5WKTKJqmRVKyRlDOWkaYKBgXioiWc5LVTc6LNK-VlLRmqqllRsVAJQNgTDAy8AECDbApopde5W0IHtrKed1Lf64oqUak1Yi0uiKtRqRD5umSsQf3D_svPBh8KQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Oxford Open Access Journals</source><creator>Prodanuk, Michael ; Timberlake, Kathryn E ; Koo, Alicia ; Chopra, Yogi ; Wall, Donna ; Science, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Prodanuk, Michael ; Timberlake, Kathryn E ; Koo, Alicia ; Chopra, Yogi ; Wall, Donna ; Science, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role in reducing empiric intravenous antibiotic (EIA) use.
Methods
This retrospective review assessed the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis for patients < 18 years undergoing HSCT at a Canadian children’s hospital. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) during the pre-engraftment period comparing the pre-levofloxacin era (Jan 1, 2019–Jun 30, 2020) to the levofloxacin era (Jul 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Patients were excluded if they were receiving EIA at the time of transplant, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or if levofloxacin use was discordant with their era. Secondary outcomes included the number of positive blood cultures and clinical deterioration episodes (clinical change resulting in blood culture draw and initiation/change of EIA).
Results
Fifty-four of 152 patients (36.5%) and 55 of 147 patients (37.4%) were included in the pre-levofloxacin and levofloxacin eras respectively. The most common reasons for exclusion were EIA use at the time of transplant and levofloxacin use discordant with the patient's era (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1). Mean DOT/pre-engraftment days (%) were significantly lower in the levofloxacin era for piperacillin-tazobactam (53.3 vs. 38.3, p=0.004) and amikacin (1.7 vs. 0.1, p=0.03), while there was no significant difference for meropenem, vancomycin, or all other antibiotics combined. There was also no significant difference in the number of positive blood cultures (11 vs. 7, p=0.35) or clinical deterioration episodes (55 vs. 66, p=0.1).
Conclusion
Levofloxacin prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT reduced percent pre-engraftment days on piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, with no significant impact on the number of positive blood cultures or clinical deterioration episodes. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship activities through reduced use of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Disclosures
Kathryn E. Timberlake, PharmD, Avir Pharma: Advisor/Consultant</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Open forum infectious diseases, 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prodanuk, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timberlake, Kathryn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Yogi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Science, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients</title><title>Open forum infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role in reducing empiric intravenous antibiotic (EIA) use.
Methods
This retrospective review assessed the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis for patients < 18 years undergoing HSCT at a Canadian children’s hospital. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) during the pre-engraftment period comparing the pre-levofloxacin era (Jan 1, 2019–Jun 30, 2020) to the levofloxacin era (Jul 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Patients were excluded if they were receiving EIA at the time of transplant, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or if levofloxacin use was discordant with their era. Secondary outcomes included the number of positive blood cultures and clinical deterioration episodes (clinical change resulting in blood culture draw and initiation/change of EIA).
Results
Fifty-four of 152 patients (36.5%) and 55 of 147 patients (37.4%) were included in the pre-levofloxacin and levofloxacin eras respectively. The most common reasons for exclusion were EIA use at the time of transplant and levofloxacin use discordant with the patient's era (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1). Mean DOT/pre-engraftment days (%) were significantly lower in the levofloxacin era for piperacillin-tazobactam (53.3 vs. 38.3, p=0.004) and amikacin (1.7 vs. 0.1, p=0.03), while there was no significant difference for meropenem, vancomycin, or all other antibiotics combined. There was also no significant difference in the number of positive blood cultures (11 vs. 7, p=0.35) or clinical deterioration episodes (55 vs. 66, p=0.1).
Conclusion
Levofloxacin prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT reduced percent pre-engraftment days on piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, with no significant impact on the number of positive blood cultures or clinical deterioration episodes. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship activities through reduced use of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Disclosures
Kathryn E. Timberlake, PharmD, Avir Pharma: Advisor/Consultant</description><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EElXpAdj5AKTYcZw4y6oqUKkSCNp15DgT1SixLdut2kNwZxK1C5ZsZkZ__v-Lh9AjJXNKSvZsW90MQzacDEpWFjdokrJUJKLkxe2f-x7NQvgmhFBKOCnKCfqheZ7N8XYPeN07qSK2Ld7A0badPUmlDf7w1u3PnTzpgK3Bq95prxVem-jlEYw9BLwwUdfaxkHeBcBjCBot4-h7g15G66yG8f0VocdL6Dq89dIE10kT8Sco7TSYGB7QXSu7ALPrnqLdy2q7fEs276_r5WKTKJqmRVKyRlDOWkaYKBgXioiWc5LVTc6LNK-VlLRmqqllRsVAJQNgTDAy8AECDbApopde5W0IHtrKed1Lf64oqUak1Yi0uiKtRqRD5umSsQf3D_svPBh8KQ</recordid><startdate>20231127</startdate><enddate>20231127</enddate><creator>Prodanuk, Michael</creator><creator>Timberlake, Kathryn E</creator><creator>Koo, Alicia</creator><creator>Chopra, Yogi</creator><creator>Wall, Donna</creator><creator>Science, Michelle</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231127</creationdate><title>1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients</title><author>Prodanuk, Michael ; Timberlake, Kathryn E ; Koo, Alicia ; Chopra, Yogi ; Wall, Donna ; Science, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1227-93d8153f30387358c08f5504bd65726bcaa1b3cdba418ad54ee33830d50e0ede3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prodanuk, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timberlake, Kathryn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Yogi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Science, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prodanuk, Michael</au><au>Timberlake, Kathryn E</au><au>Koo, Alicia</au><au>Chopra, Yogi</au><au>Wall, Donna</au><au>Science, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2023-11-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role in reducing empiric intravenous antibiotic (EIA) use.
Methods
This retrospective review assessed the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis for patients < 18 years undergoing HSCT at a Canadian children’s hospital. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) during the pre-engraftment period comparing the pre-levofloxacin era (Jan 1, 2019–Jun 30, 2020) to the levofloxacin era (Jul 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Patients were excluded if they were receiving EIA at the time of transplant, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or if levofloxacin use was discordant with their era. Secondary outcomes included the number of positive blood cultures and clinical deterioration episodes (clinical change resulting in blood culture draw and initiation/change of EIA).
Results
Fifty-four of 152 patients (36.5%) and 55 of 147 patients (37.4%) were included in the pre-levofloxacin and levofloxacin eras respectively. The most common reasons for exclusion were EIA use at the time of transplant and levofloxacin use discordant with the patient's era (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1). Mean DOT/pre-engraftment days (%) were significantly lower in the levofloxacin era for piperacillin-tazobactam (53.3 vs. 38.3, p=0.004) and amikacin (1.7 vs. 0.1, p=0.03), while there was no significant difference for meropenem, vancomycin, or all other antibiotics combined. There was also no significant difference in the number of positive blood cultures (11 vs. 7, p=0.35) or clinical deterioration episodes (55 vs. 66, p=0.1).
Conclusion
Levofloxacin prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT reduced percent pre-engraftment days on piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, with no significant impact on the number of positive blood cultures or clinical deterioration episodes. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship activities through reduced use of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Disclosures
Kathryn E. Timberlake, PharmD, Avir Pharma: Advisor/Consultant</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-8957 |
ispartof | Open forum infectious diseases, 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2) |
issn | 2328-8957 2328-8957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ofid_ofad500_1497 |
source | PubMed Central; Oxford Open Access Journals |
title | 1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1664.%20The%20Impact%20of%20Levofloxacin%20Prophylaxis%20on%20Empiric%20Intravenous%20Antibiotic%20Use%20in%20Pediatric%20Hematopoietic%20Stem%20Cell%20Transplant%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Open%20forum%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Prodanuk,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-11-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1227-93d8153f30387358c08f5504bd65726bcaa1b3cdba418ad54ee33830d50e0ede3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1497&rfr_iscdi=true |