Loading…

2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort

Abstract Background Micafungin is restricted by the Antimicrobial Stewardship group at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), but use in intensive care units (ICUs) is higher than predicted according to benchmarking data. Micafungin is frequently requested empirically for sepsis despite the lack of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open forum infectious diseases 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2)
Main Authors: Cozzi, Francesca E, Rodriguez, Raul, Herald, Fischer, Hodgson, Hayley A, Sansom, Sarah E, Shankaran, Shivanjali, Varughese, Christy A, Won, Sarah Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title Open forum infectious diseases
container_volume 10
creator Cozzi, Francesca E
Rodriguez, Raul
Herald, Fischer
Hodgson, Hayley A
Sansom, Sarah E
Shankaran, Shivanjali
Varughese, Christy A
Won, Sarah Y
description Abstract Background Micafungin is restricted by the Antimicrobial Stewardship group at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), but use in intensive care units (ICUs) is higher than predicted according to benchmarking data. Micafungin is frequently requested empirically for sepsis despite the lack of evidence to support a mortality benefit. The objective of this review was to characterize micafungin requests in the ICUs at RUMC. Methods Retrospective data was collected from June 2020 - August 2022 at RUMC, an academic tertiary care center in Chicago, IL with 104 adult ICU beds. Any patient with a new micafungin order during an ICU stay was reviewed for order appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Micafungin requests were classified as “empiric” or “documented candidiasis.” The primary outcome was incidence of fungemia on culture drawn 3 days before to 7 days after the micafungin order. Among empiric requests, incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), defined as fungi isolated in a culture from a sterile site, was also evaluated. Results 232 new micafungin orders were placed during the study period, of which 51 (22%) were prescribed for documented candidiasis and 181 (78%) were empiric. Of patients for whom empiric micafungin was ordered, 18/181 (10%) subsequently developed an IFI. Of these, only 6/181 (3%) developed fungemia. Other IFI identified included 8/181 (4%) abdominal infections and 4/181 (2%) with positive miscellaneous cultures. 90% (163/181) of patients with an empiric micafungin order did not develop an IFI. Conclusion The overall incidence of critically ill patients who developed an IFI within 7 days of a micafungin request was very low. Data sharing, prescriber education, and additional stewardship interventions should be explored to improve the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ofid_ofad500_1865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1225-335ad0bd0a7f037602ae40cdf629b6f608be59148c081e750d32893348e4c96d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPAjEQxxujiQT5AN76AVycttt9HA3xQYKBGDlvut0p1GBL2kLit3cXOHj0Mu__ZOZHyD2DKYNaPHpju96oTkJfqQp5RUZc8Cqralle_4lvySTGLwBgDCSU9YjsOM_FlK5UShhcpN7Qd6uVObiNdXQVMOpgW-s2tE_TFuncJXTRHpHOVEC6djYNLeXoso0YjipZ79SOfmAKPu5Rp9Os3_qQ7siNUbuIk4sfk_XL8-fsLVssX-ezp0WmGecyE0KqDtoOVGlAlAVwhTnozhS8bgtTQNWirFleaagYlhK6_r9aiLzCXNdFJ8aEnffq_oQY0DT7YL9V-GkYNAOxZiDWXIg1A7Fe83DW-MP-H-O_ZIpvHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><creator>Cozzi, Francesca E ; Rodriguez, Raul ; Herald, Fischer ; Hodgson, Hayley A ; Sansom, Sarah E ; Shankaran, Shivanjali ; Varughese, Christy A ; Won, Sarah Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Francesca E ; Rodriguez, Raul ; Herald, Fischer ; Hodgson, Hayley A ; Sansom, Sarah E ; Shankaran, Shivanjali ; Varughese, Christy A ; Won, Sarah Y</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Micafungin is restricted by the Antimicrobial Stewardship group at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), but use in intensive care units (ICUs) is higher than predicted according to benchmarking data. Micafungin is frequently requested empirically for sepsis despite the lack of evidence to support a mortality benefit. The objective of this review was to characterize micafungin requests in the ICUs at RUMC. Methods Retrospective data was collected from June 2020 - August 2022 at RUMC, an academic tertiary care center in Chicago, IL with 104 adult ICU beds. Any patient with a new micafungin order during an ICU stay was reviewed for order appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Micafungin requests were classified as “empiric” or “documented candidiasis.” The primary outcome was incidence of fungemia on culture drawn 3 days before to 7 days after the micafungin order. Among empiric requests, incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), defined as fungi isolated in a culture from a sterile site, was also evaluated. Results 232 new micafungin orders were placed during the study period, of which 51 (22%) were prescribed for documented candidiasis and 181 (78%) were empiric. Of patients for whom empiric micafungin was ordered, 18/181 (10%) subsequently developed an IFI. Of these, only 6/181 (3%) developed fungemia. Other IFI identified included 8/181 (4%) abdominal infections and 4/181 (2%) with positive miscellaneous cultures. 90% (163/181) of patients with an empiric micafungin order did not develop an IFI. Conclusion The overall incidence of critically ill patients who developed an IFI within 7 days of a micafungin request was very low. Data sharing, prescriber education, and additional stewardship interventions should be explored to improve the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Open forum infectious diseases, 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Francesca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herald, Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Hayley A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansom, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, Shivanjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varughese, Christy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Sarah Y</creatorcontrib><title>2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort</title><title>Open forum infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract Background Micafungin is restricted by the Antimicrobial Stewardship group at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), but use in intensive care units (ICUs) is higher than predicted according to benchmarking data. Micafungin is frequently requested empirically for sepsis despite the lack of evidence to support a mortality benefit. The objective of this review was to characterize micafungin requests in the ICUs at RUMC. Methods Retrospective data was collected from June 2020 - August 2022 at RUMC, an academic tertiary care center in Chicago, IL with 104 adult ICU beds. Any patient with a new micafungin order during an ICU stay was reviewed for order appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Micafungin requests were classified as “empiric” or “documented candidiasis.” The primary outcome was incidence of fungemia on culture drawn 3 days before to 7 days after the micafungin order. Among empiric requests, incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), defined as fungi isolated in a culture from a sterile site, was also evaluated. Results 232 new micafungin orders were placed during the study period, of which 51 (22%) were prescribed for documented candidiasis and 181 (78%) were empiric. Of patients for whom empiric micafungin was ordered, 18/181 (10%) subsequently developed an IFI. Of these, only 6/181 (3%) developed fungemia. Other IFI identified included 8/181 (4%) abdominal infections and 4/181 (2%) with positive miscellaneous cultures. 90% (163/181) of patients with an empiric micafungin order did not develop an IFI. Conclusion The overall incidence of critically ill patients who developed an IFI within 7 days of a micafungin request was very low. Data sharing, prescriber education, and additional stewardship interventions should be explored to improve the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures</description><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtPAjEQxxujiQT5AN76AVycttt9HA3xQYKBGDlvut0p1GBL2kLit3cXOHj0Mu__ZOZHyD2DKYNaPHpju96oTkJfqQp5RUZc8Cqralle_4lvySTGLwBgDCSU9YjsOM_FlK5UShhcpN7Qd6uVObiNdXQVMOpgW-s2tE_TFuncJXTRHpHOVEC6djYNLeXoso0YjipZ79SOfmAKPu5Rp9Os3_qQ7siNUbuIk4sfk_XL8-fsLVssX-ezp0WmGecyE0KqDtoOVGlAlAVwhTnozhS8bgtTQNWirFleaagYlhK6_r9aiLzCXNdFJ8aEnffq_oQY0DT7YL9V-GkYNAOxZiDWXIg1A7Fe83DW-MP-H-O_ZIpvHA</recordid><startdate>20231127</startdate><enddate>20231127</enddate><creator>Cozzi, Francesca E</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Raul</creator><creator>Herald, Fischer</creator><creator>Hodgson, Hayley A</creator><creator>Sansom, Sarah E</creator><creator>Shankaran, Shivanjali</creator><creator>Varughese, Christy A</creator><creator>Won, Sarah Y</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231127</creationdate><title>2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort</title><author>Cozzi, Francesca E ; Rodriguez, Raul ; Herald, Fischer ; Hodgson, Hayley A ; Sansom, Sarah E ; Shankaran, Shivanjali ; Varughese, Christy A ; Won, Sarah Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1225-335ad0bd0a7f037602ae40cdf629b6f608be59148c081e750d32893348e4c96d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Francesca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herald, Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Hayley A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansom, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, Shivanjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varughese, Christy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Sarah Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cozzi, Francesca E</au><au>Rodriguez, Raul</au><au>Herald, Fischer</au><au>Hodgson, Hayley A</au><au>Sansom, Sarah E</au><au>Shankaran, Shivanjali</au><au>Varughese, Christy A</au><au>Won, Sarah Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort</atitle><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2023-11-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Micafungin is restricted by the Antimicrobial Stewardship group at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), but use in intensive care units (ICUs) is higher than predicted according to benchmarking data. Micafungin is frequently requested empirically for sepsis despite the lack of evidence to support a mortality benefit. The objective of this review was to characterize micafungin requests in the ICUs at RUMC. Methods Retrospective data was collected from June 2020 - August 2022 at RUMC, an academic tertiary care center in Chicago, IL with 104 adult ICU beds. Any patient with a new micafungin order during an ICU stay was reviewed for order appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Micafungin requests were classified as “empiric” or “documented candidiasis.” The primary outcome was incidence of fungemia on culture drawn 3 days before to 7 days after the micafungin order. Among empiric requests, incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), defined as fungi isolated in a culture from a sterile site, was also evaluated. Results 232 new micafungin orders were placed during the study period, of which 51 (22%) were prescribed for documented candidiasis and 181 (78%) were empiric. Of patients for whom empiric micafungin was ordered, 18/181 (10%) subsequently developed an IFI. Of these, only 6/181 (3%) developed fungemia. Other IFI identified included 8/181 (4%) abdominal infections and 4/181 (2%) with positive miscellaneous cultures. 90% (163/181) of patients with an empiric micafungin order did not develop an IFI. Conclusion The overall incidence of critically ill patients who developed an IFI within 7 days of a micafungin request was very low. Data sharing, prescriber education, and additional stewardship interventions should be explored to improve the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-8957
ispartof Open forum infectious diseases, 2023-11, Vol.10 (Supplement_2)
issn 2328-8957
2328-8957
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ofid_ofad500_1865
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals
title 2243. Patterns of Micafungin Prescribing in the Intensive Care Unit in an Observational Retrospective Cohort
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2243.%20Patterns%20of%20Micafungin%20Prescribing%20in%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20in%20an%20Observational%20Retrospective%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=Open%20forum%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Cozzi,%20Francesca%20E&rft.date=2023-11-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1225-335ad0bd0a7f037602ae40cdf629b6f608be59148c081e750d32893348e4c96d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1865&rfr_iscdi=true