Loading…

Political inequality: reasons for optimism?

I comment on the article in this collection by Ansell and Gingrich, who highlight the concept of political inequality. Then they investigate empirically whether political inequality has risen in line with economic inequality over the past few decades in the UK. This is an important question, as poli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oxford Open Economics 2024-07, Vol.3 (Supplement_1), p.i282-i290
Main Author: Cagé, Julia
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-d9e6a8aa0df2bf2c961341206747f0ab68ea2da595c47ed9ec808d641e358d323
container_end_page i290
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page i282
container_title Oxford Open Economics
container_volume 3
creator Cagé, Julia
description I comment on the article in this collection by Ansell and Gingrich, who highlight the concept of political inequality. Then they investigate empirically whether political inequality has risen in line with economic inequality over the past few decades in the UK. This is an important question, as political inequality can easily generate an inequality trap. I focus on the last dimension of political inequality that Ansell and Gingrich consider—who politicians are—and highlight that it is strongly linked to the first two: who votes and who they vote for. I first argue that the lack of political representativeness may at least partly explain the rise in abstention. I then highlight the role played by campaign finance regulations in explaining the relationship between political and economic inequalities. Finally, using the example of gender underrepresentation, I argue that shifting descriptive representation may have concrete policy consequences.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ooec/odad032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ooec_odad032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ooec/odad032</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ooec/odad032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-d9e6a8aa0df2bf2c961341206747f0ab68ea2da595c47ed9ec808d641e358d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jztLA0EUhQdRMMR0_oDtLHTNnfeujUiIDwhoofVwMw8Y2c2sM0mRf--GpLCyOufAx4GPkGsK9xRaPk_J23ly6ICzMzJhWrJaghbnf_olmZXyDQAcoNUgJ-T2I3VxGy12Vdz4nx2Oa_9QZY8lbUoVUq7SsI19LP3jFbkI2BU_O-WUfD0vPxev9er95W3xtKotBc1q13qFDSK4wNaB2VZRLigDpYUOgGvVeGQOZSut0H6kbQONU4J6LhvHGZ-Su-OvzamU7IMZcuwx7w0Fc3A1B1dzch3xmyOedsP_5C-8alWP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political inequality: reasons for optimism?</title><source>EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Cagé, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>I comment on the article in this collection by Ansell and Gingrich, who highlight the concept of political inequality. Then they investigate empirically whether political inequality has risen in line with economic inequality over the past few decades in the UK. This is an important question, as political inequality can easily generate an inequality trap. I focus on the last dimension of political inequality that Ansell and Gingrich consider—who politicians are—and highlight that it is strongly linked to the first two: who votes and who they vote for. I first argue that the lack of political representativeness may at least partly explain the rise in abstention. I then highlight the role played by campaign finance regulations in explaining the relationship between political and economic inequalities. Finally, using the example of gender underrepresentation, I argue that shifting descriptive representation may have concrete policy consequences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2752-5074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2752-5074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ooec/odad032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Oxford Open Economics, 2024-07, Vol.3 (Supplement_1), p.i282-i290</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-d9e6a8aa0df2bf2c961341206747f0ab68ea2da595c47ed9ec808d641e358d323</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7085-5774</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Political inequality: reasons for optimism?</title><title>Oxford Open Economics</title><description>I comment on the article in this collection by Ansell and Gingrich, who highlight the concept of political inequality. Then they investigate empirically whether political inequality has risen in line with economic inequality over the past few decades in the UK. This is an important question, as political inequality can easily generate an inequality trap. I focus on the last dimension of political inequality that Ansell and Gingrich consider—who politicians are—and highlight that it is strongly linked to the first two: who votes and who they vote for. I first argue that the lack of political representativeness may at least partly explain the rise in abstention. I then highlight the role played by campaign finance regulations in explaining the relationship between political and economic inequalities. Finally, using the example of gender underrepresentation, I argue that shifting descriptive representation may have concrete policy consequences.</description><issn>2752-5074</issn><issn>2752-5074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jztLA0EUhQdRMMR0_oDtLHTNnfeujUiIDwhoofVwMw8Y2c2sM0mRf--GpLCyOufAx4GPkGsK9xRaPk_J23ly6ICzMzJhWrJaghbnf_olmZXyDQAcoNUgJ-T2I3VxGy12Vdz4nx2Oa_9QZY8lbUoVUq7SsI19LP3jFbkI2BU_O-WUfD0vPxev9er95W3xtKotBc1q13qFDSK4wNaB2VZRLigDpYUOgGvVeGQOZSut0H6kbQONU4J6LhvHGZ-Su-OvzamU7IMZcuwx7w0Fc3A1B1dzch3xmyOedsP_5C-8alWP</recordid><startdate>20240705</startdate><enddate>20240705</enddate><creator>Cagé, Julia</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-5774</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240705</creationdate><title>Political inequality: reasons for optimism?</title><author>Cagé, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-d9e6a8aa0df2bf2c961341206747f0ab68ea2da595c47ed9ec808d641e358d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Oxford Open Economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cagé, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political inequality: reasons for optimism?</atitle><jtitle>Oxford Open Economics</jtitle><date>2024-07-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>i282</spage><epage>i290</epage><pages>i282-i290</pages><issn>2752-5074</issn><eissn>2752-5074</eissn><abstract>I comment on the article in this collection by Ansell and Gingrich, who highlight the concept of political inequality. Then they investigate empirically whether political inequality has risen in line with economic inequality over the past few decades in the UK. This is an important question, as political inequality can easily generate an inequality trap. I focus on the last dimension of political inequality that Ansell and Gingrich consider—who politicians are—and highlight that it is strongly linked to the first two: who votes and who they vote for. I first argue that the lack of political representativeness may at least partly explain the rise in abstention. I then highlight the role played by campaign finance regulations in explaining the relationship between political and economic inequalities. Finally, using the example of gender underrepresentation, I argue that shifting descriptive representation may have concrete policy consequences.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ooec/odad032</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-5774</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2752-5074
ispartof Oxford Open Economics, 2024-07, Vol.3 (Supplement_1), p.i282-i290
issn 2752-5074
2752-5074
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ooec_odad032
source EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate; Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
title Political inequality: reasons for optimism?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A43%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20inequality:%20reasons%20for%20optimism?&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20Open%20Economics&rft.au=Cag%C3%A9,%20Julia&rft.date=2024-07-05&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=i282&rft.epage=i290&rft.pages=i282-i290&rft.issn=2752-5074&rft.eissn=2752-5074&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ooec/odad032&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/ooec/odad032%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-d9e6a8aa0df2bf2c961341206747f0ab68ea2da595c47ed9ec808d641e358d323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ooec/odad032&rfr_iscdi=true