Loading…
DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE
Neuropathy is one of the most severe side effects of disulfiram therapy. We report the case of a young man who developed a neuropathy following disulfiram administration, with a virtually complete recovery in 14 months. We then discuss 37 cases of disulfiram neuropathy reported since 1971. Evidence...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford) 1989, Vol.24 (5), p.429-437 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd70373350c4fd251eb65e790e945520304edff58639389f331d654370375a963 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 437 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | FRISONI, GIOVANNI B. MONDA, VIINCENZO DI |
description | Neuropathy is one of the most severe side effects of disulfiram therapy. We report the case of a young man who developed a neuropathy following disulfiram administration, with a virtually complete recovery in 14 months. We then discuss 37 cases of disulfiram neuropathy reported since 1971. Evidence is given that: (1) there is no numerical sex prevalence, although the incidence of the disease in women is probably disproportionately high; (2) symptom onset latency is dose-dependent, being longer at 250 mg/day or less; (3) neurological deficits are also dose-dependent, being milder at 250 mg/day or less; (4) the two previous findings and single observations suggest that disulfiram neuropathy is a dose-dependent phenomenon; (5) recovery probably follows a course which depends primarily on the initial degree of impairment; (6) the genetic mechanism probably involves carbon disulfide and a hypothesis as to the possible biochemical mechanism is proposed; (7) chloral hydrate can bear a potentiation effect on neuropathy, and the association with disulfiram is best avoided. Further, we give guidelines for the differentiation between alcoholic and disulfiram neuropathy, advise prescribing the drug at 250 mg daily or less, if possible, and stress the utmost importance of an early diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044938 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_alcalc_a044938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_9MF709XH_S</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd70373350c4fd251eb65e790e945520304edff58639389f331d654370375a963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMFKw0AURQdRaq1-gpCNoIvUmbyZJCO4iG1iAm1T0larmyFNJtDamjJpoe78B__QL3FKSkF48Bb33sd9B6EbgtsEc7gvd0Wp8kW5VZ_psmqny0xPO8WUcnBPUJNQm5rAsHWKmtgBZmJK6Dm6qKoFxoSCRRqoYTGm7ayJnrrRaNILosTrGwN_ksRDbxy-PRiekfgvkf9q3BLukN_vH8Jd987wBl0tDONkbMSBNnW8kX-JzgrdRF4ddgtNAn_cCc1e_Bx1vJ6ZAXM3Zp47GBzQzTJa5BYjcmYz6XAsOWXMwoCpzIuCuTboR3gBQHKbUdinWMptaKHH-m6myqpSshBrNV-l6ksQLPZoxH80okYjDmh0_rrOr7ezlcyP6QMLrZu1Pq82cneUU_UhbEd3EOH0XfB-4GA-DcUI_gBXym8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE</title><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><creator>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B. ; MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</creator><creatorcontrib>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B. ; MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</creatorcontrib><description>Neuropathy is one of the most severe side effects of disulfiram therapy. We report the case of a young man who developed a neuropathy following disulfiram administration, with a virtually complete recovery in 14 months. We then discuss 37 cases of disulfiram neuropathy reported since 1971. Evidence is given that: (1) there is no numerical sex prevalence, although the incidence of the disease in women is probably disproportionately high; (2) symptom onset latency is dose-dependent, being longer at 250 mg/day or less; (3) neurological deficits are also dose-dependent, being milder at 250 mg/day or less; (4) the two previous findings and single observations suggest that disulfiram neuropathy is a dose-dependent phenomenon; (5) recovery probably follows a course which depends primarily on the initial degree of impairment; (6) the genetic mechanism probably involves carbon disulfide and a hypothesis as to the possible biochemical mechanism is proposed; (7) chloral hydrate can bear a potentiation effect on neuropathy, and the association with disulfiram is best avoided. Further, we give guidelines for the differentiation between alcoholic and disulfiram neuropathy, advise prescribing the drug at 250 mg daily or less, if possible, and stress the utmost importance of an early diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-0414</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044938</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2554935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Disulfiram - adverse effects ; Gait ; Humans ; Leg - innervation ; Male ; Movement Disorders - etiology ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><ispartof>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford), 1989, Vol.24 (5), p.429-437</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd70373350c4fd251eb65e790e945520304edff58639389f331d654370375a963</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2554935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</creatorcontrib><title>DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE</title><title>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Alcohol Alcohol</addtitle><description>Neuropathy is one of the most severe side effects of disulfiram therapy. We report the case of a young man who developed a neuropathy following disulfiram administration, with a virtually complete recovery in 14 months. We then discuss 37 cases of disulfiram neuropathy reported since 1971. Evidence is given that: (1) there is no numerical sex prevalence, although the incidence of the disease in women is probably disproportionately high; (2) symptom onset latency is dose-dependent, being longer at 250 mg/day or less; (3) neurological deficits are also dose-dependent, being milder at 250 mg/day or less; (4) the two previous findings and single observations suggest that disulfiram neuropathy is a dose-dependent phenomenon; (5) recovery probably follows a course which depends primarily on the initial degree of impairment; (6) the genetic mechanism probably involves carbon disulfide and a hypothesis as to the possible biochemical mechanism is proposed; (7) chloral hydrate can bear a potentiation effect on neuropathy, and the association with disulfiram is best avoided. Further, we give guidelines for the differentiation between alcoholic and disulfiram neuropathy, advise prescribing the drug at 250 mg daily or less, if possible, and stress the utmost importance of an early diagnosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Disulfiram - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg - innervation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><issn>0735-0414</issn><issn>1464-3502</issn><issn>1464-3502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMFKw0AURQdRaq1-gpCNoIvUmbyZJCO4iG1iAm1T0larmyFNJtDamjJpoe78B__QL3FKSkF48Bb33sd9B6EbgtsEc7gvd0Wp8kW5VZ_psmqny0xPO8WUcnBPUJNQm5rAsHWKmtgBZmJK6Dm6qKoFxoSCRRqoYTGm7ayJnrrRaNILosTrGwN_ksRDbxy-PRiekfgvkf9q3BLukN_vH8Jd987wBl0tDONkbMSBNnW8kX-JzgrdRF4ddgtNAn_cCc1e_Bx1vJ6ZAXM3Zp47GBzQzTJa5BYjcmYz6XAsOWXMwoCpzIuCuTboR3gBQHKbUdinWMptaKHH-m6myqpSshBrNV-l6ksQLPZoxH80okYjDmh0_rrOr7ezlcyP6QMLrZu1Pq82cneUU_UhbEd3EOH0XfB-4GA-DcUI_gBXym8Q</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B.</creator><creator>MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE</title><author>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B. ; MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd70373350c4fd251eb65e790e945520304edff58639389f331d654370375a963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Disulfiram - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg - innervation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRISONI, GIOVANNI B.</au><au>MONDA, VIINCENZO DI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE</atitle><jtitle>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Alcohol</addtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>429-437</pages><issn>0735-0414</issn><issn>1464-3502</issn><eissn>1464-3502</eissn><abstract>Neuropathy is one of the most severe side effects of disulfiram therapy. We report the case of a young man who developed a neuropathy following disulfiram administration, with a virtually complete recovery in 14 months. We then discuss 37 cases of disulfiram neuropathy reported since 1971. Evidence is given that: (1) there is no numerical sex prevalence, although the incidence of the disease in women is probably disproportionately high; (2) symptom onset latency is dose-dependent, being longer at 250 mg/day or less; (3) neurological deficits are also dose-dependent, being milder at 250 mg/day or less; (4) the two previous findings and single observations suggest that disulfiram neuropathy is a dose-dependent phenomenon; (5) recovery probably follows a course which depends primarily on the initial degree of impairment; (6) the genetic mechanism probably involves carbon disulfide and a hypothesis as to the possible biochemical mechanism is proposed; (7) chloral hydrate can bear a potentiation effect on neuropathy, and the association with disulfiram is best avoided. Further, we give guidelines for the differentiation between alcoholic and disulfiram neuropathy, advise prescribing the drug at 250 mg daily or less, if possible, and stress the utmost importance of an early diagnosis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>2554935</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044938</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-0414 |
ispartof | Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford), 1989, Vol.24 (5), p.429-437 |
issn | 0735-0414 1464-3502 1464-3502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_alcalc_a044938 |
source | Oxford University Press Archive |
subjects | Adult Disulfiram - adverse effects Gait Humans Leg - innervation Male Movement Disorders - etiology Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced Product Surveillance, Postmarketing |
title | DISULFIRAM NEUROPATHY: A REVIEW (1971–1988) AND REPORT OF A CASE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DISULFIRAM%20NEUROPATHY:%20A%20REVIEW%20(1971%E2%80%931988)%20AND%20REPORT%20OF%20A%20CASE&rft.jtitle=Alcohol%20and%20alcoholism%20(Oxford)&rft.au=FRISONI,%20GIOVANNI%20B.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=429-437&rft.issn=0735-0414&rft.eissn=1464-3502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044938&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_9MF709XH_S%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd70373350c4fd251eb65e790e945520304edff58639389f331d654370375a963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/2554935&rfr_iscdi=true |