Comparative Reject Analysis in Conventional Film-screen and Digital Storage Phosphor Radiography

• Published in: Radiation protection dosimetry 2001-01, Vol.94 (1-2), p.69-71
• Main Authors: Peer, S., Peer, R., Giacomuzzi, S.M., Jaschke, W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Miscellaneous. Technology; Quality Control; Radiation Dosage; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry; Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation; Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards; Technology, Radiologic - standards; X-Ray Film - standards; X-Ray Intensifying Screens - standards
• ISSN: 0144-8420; 1742-3406
• DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006482

The purpose of this work was to gather information about the benefits in patient care caused by the introduction of digital radiography. In particular, the possibility of reducing the number of image repeats and thus unnecessary patient radiation was sought. Waste films of conventional radiography were collected - in digital radiography each image delete command at the post-processing workstation was documented. Rejected images were analysed retrospectively. The overall reject rate was 27.6% in the conventional and 2.3% in the digital department. While in the conventional department the main reason for rejection was 'exposure' and 'others' (i.e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the digital environment was 'positioning'. Reject analysis yields representative data about the current performance of a radiology department. A marked reduction of repeated X rays and consequently reduced radiation exposure of the patient was clearly shown in this study comparing two differently working radiology departments. This is one of several benefits of digital radiography in patient care.