Loading…

Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?

A primary goal of radiation protection is to ensure that workers and members of the public are not caused significant harm by practices that involve the use of ionising radiation. An important method for achieving this goal for radiation workers involves the use of personal dosemeters providing sign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2002-02, Vol.98 (2), p.239-245
Main Author: D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c146K-1453ae488a98b84edb5eaecf8f0ff45a818849b8d17149bedd667dc08c7285633
cites
container_end_page 245
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 98
creator D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald
description A primary goal of radiation protection is to ensure that workers and members of the public are not caused significant harm by practices that involve the use of ionising radiation. An important method for achieving this goal for radiation workers involves the use of personal dosemeters providing signals that are proportional to the external dose equivalents received by individuals. The quantity determined from measurements made with personal dosemeters is assumed to be a reasonable surrogate for a desired protection quantity such as equivalent dose. Two basic parameters involved in the assessment of equivalent dose based on measurements with personal dosemeters are the frequency of the measurements and the lower level of the quantity measured that is of use to radiation protection. The question posed in this debate is whether it is useful to assess annual effective doses that are less than 100 mSv. This question relates not only to the practical capabilities of current dosemeters, but also to the rationale for performing measurements and the implications of such measurements in the assessment of the risk associated with exposure to low doses of ionising radiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006717
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a006717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_0N03WPD6_K</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c146K-1453ae488a98b84edb5eaecf8f0ff45a818849b8d17149bedd667dc08c7285633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOKfvELzvPFnSJvVGxjbd2FDBDcWbkDYn2Lm1I2nHfHs7NgSvfs7h_w6Hj5BbBj0GKb-r9q7ydlU1vjTr0PNb2zMAiWTyjHSYFP2IC0jOSQeYEJESfbgkVyGsAPoyjUWH6EW1LfJAm9KipyPMTI00otNAi5ouA7pmTeuKDkLAEOigLBuzpmPnMK-LHdJR1e5p_WVqajzS-aHUTiVlAHTztnu4Jheu_QxvTtkly8fxYjiJ5i9P0-FgHuVMJLOIiZgbFEqZVGVKoM1iNJg75cA5ERvFlBJppiyTrE20NkmkzUHlsq_ihPMuuT_ezX0Vgkent77YGP-jGeiDKv1flW5V6ZOqFo6OcBFq3P-Rxn_rRHIZ68nHp4Zn4O-vo0TP-C_7q3H7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</creator><creatorcontrib>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</creatorcontrib><description>A primary goal of radiation protection is to ensure that workers and members of the public are not caused significant harm by practices that involve the use of ionising radiation. An important method for achieving this goal for radiation workers involves the use of personal dosemeters providing signals that are proportional to the external dose equivalents received by individuals. The quantity determined from measurements made with personal dosemeters is assumed to be a reasonable surrogate for a desired protection quantity such as equivalent dose. Two basic parameters involved in the assessment of equivalent dose based on measurements with personal dosemeters are the frequency of the measurements and the lower level of the quantity measured that is of use to radiation protection. The question posed in this debate is whether it is useful to assess annual effective doses that are less than 100 mSv. This question relates not only to the practical capabilities of current dosemeters, but also to the rationale for performing measurements and the implications of such measurements in the assessment of the risk associated with exposure to low doses of ionising radiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2002-02, Vol.98 (2), p.239-245</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c146K-1453ae488a98b84edb5eaecf8f0ff45a818849b8d17149bedd667dc08c7285633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</creatorcontrib><title>Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>A primary goal of radiation protection is to ensure that workers and members of the public are not caused significant harm by practices that involve the use of ionising radiation. An important method for achieving this goal for radiation workers involves the use of personal dosemeters providing signals that are proportional to the external dose equivalents received by individuals. The quantity determined from measurements made with personal dosemeters is assumed to be a reasonable surrogate for a desired protection quantity such as equivalent dose. Two basic parameters involved in the assessment of equivalent dose based on measurements with personal dosemeters are the frequency of the measurements and the lower level of the quantity measured that is of use to radiation protection. The question posed in this debate is whether it is useful to assess annual effective doses that are less than 100 mSv. This question relates not only to the practical capabilities of current dosemeters, but also to the rationale for performing measurements and the implications of such measurements in the assessment of the risk associated with exposure to low doses of ionising radiation.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOKfvELzvPFnSJvVGxjbd2FDBDcWbkDYn2Lm1I2nHfHs7NgSvfs7h_w6Hj5BbBj0GKb-r9q7ydlU1vjTr0PNb2zMAiWTyjHSYFP2IC0jOSQeYEJESfbgkVyGsAPoyjUWH6EW1LfJAm9KipyPMTI00otNAi5ouA7pmTeuKDkLAEOigLBuzpmPnMK-LHdJR1e5p_WVqajzS-aHUTiVlAHTztnu4Jheu_QxvTtkly8fxYjiJ5i9P0-FgHuVMJLOIiZgbFEqZVGVKoM1iNJg75cA5ERvFlBJppiyTrE20NkmkzUHlsq_ihPMuuT_ezX0Vgkent77YGP-jGeiDKv1flW5V6ZOqFo6OcBFq3P-Rxn_rRHIZ68nHp4Zn4O-vo0TP-C_7q3H7</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c146K-1453ae488a98b84edb5eaecf8f0ff45a818849b8d17149bedd667dc08c7285633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>D. J. Strom Opposer J. R. Cameron Moderator J. C. McDonald</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>239-245</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>A primary goal of radiation protection is to ensure that workers and members of the public are not caused significant harm by practices that involve the use of ionising radiation. An important method for achieving this goal for radiation workers involves the use of personal dosemeters providing signals that are proportional to the external dose equivalents received by individuals. The quantity determined from measurements made with personal dosemeters is assumed to be a reasonable surrogate for a desired protection quantity such as equivalent dose. Two basic parameters involved in the assessment of equivalent dose based on measurements with personal dosemeters are the frequency of the measurements and the lower level of the quantity measured that is of use to radiation protection. The question posed in this debate is whether it is useful to assess annual effective doses that are less than 100 mSv. This question relates not only to the practical capabilities of current dosemeters, but also to the rationale for performing measurements and the implications of such measurements in the assessment of the risk associated with exposure to low doses of ionising radiation.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006717</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2002-02, Vol.98 (2), p.239-245
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a006717
source Oxford Journals Online
title Topics under Debate - Is it Useful to Assess Annual Effective Doses that are Less than 100 mSv?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topics%20under%20Debate%20-%20Is%20it%20Useful%20to%20Assess%20Annual%20Effective%20Doses%20that%20are%20Less%20than%20100%20mSv?&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.aucorp=D.%20J.%20Strom%20Opposer%20J.%20R.%20Cameron%20Moderator%20J.%20C.%20McDonald&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=239-245&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006717&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_0N03WPD6_K%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c146K-1453ae488a98b84edb5eaecf8f0ff45a818849b8d17149bedd667dc08c7285633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true