Loading…
Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent
The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum d...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 260 |
container_issue | 1-4 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Naismith, O.F. Siebert, B.R.L. Thomas, D.J. |
description | The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a031954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_SHLP7D73_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkN1OGzEQhS1UpKaBd7BQbzf1X9a7uUMQmkhRGwWQUG8sZz1uTRN7sZ2IPkNfGocgJK5mNPPNmZmD0AUlI0pa_i082xDNY9hFrzdpFHsz0oTTdixO0IBKwSouSP0JDQgVomoEI5_Rl5QeCWGyQAP0fwWpDz4BDhb_gF2OwePrkGALGWLCzuOVNk5nV-rLGDJ0r-nU711Bt-BzmuBLj-d-Dym730eyiN1B98e7px0knAOeb_sY9oCnhdnqXIoFOezB06ed2-tNETpDp7Z8AedvcYjub6Z3V7Nq8fP7_OpyUXWcNbkCsmaEcN4Io1tNpTSUaWE70jLNbQuGUUuA1WbdjOXa0LZhXcvbtbVAx7Y2fIgmR90uhpQiWNXHclT8pyhRB1vVR1tVsVW92VqGvx6He506vbFR-86ldwVW11KU44aoOmIuZXh-b-v4V9WSy7GaPfxSt7PFUl5Lrh74C_KpknU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RPDODE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2667403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, B.R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkN1OGzEQhS1UpKaBd7BQbzf1X9a7uUMQmkhRGwWQUG8sZz1uTRN7sZ2IPkNfGocgJK5mNPPNmZmD0AUlI0pa_i082xDNY9hFrzdpFHsz0oTTdixO0IBKwSouSP0JDQgVomoEI5_Rl5QeCWGyQAP0fwWpDz4BDhb_gF2OwePrkGALGWLCzuOVNk5nV-rLGDJ0r-nU711Bt-BzmuBLj-d-Dym730eyiN1B98e7px0knAOeb_sY9oCnhdnqXIoFOezB06ed2-tNETpDp7Z8AedvcYjub6Z3V7Nq8fP7_OpyUXWcNbkCsmaEcN4Io1tNpTSUaWE70jLNbQuGUUuA1WbdjOXa0LZhXcvbtbVAx7Y2fIgmR90uhpQiWNXHclT8pyhRB1vVR1tVsVW92VqGvx6He506vbFR-86ldwVW11KU44aoOmIuZXh-b-v4V9WSy7GaPfxSt7PFUl5Lrh74C_KpknU</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Naismith, O.F.</creator><creator>Siebert, B.R.L.</creator><creator>Thomas, D.J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><author>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, B.R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naismith, O.F.</au><au>Siebert, B.R.L.</au><au>Thomas, D.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><coden>RPDODE</coden><abstract>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a031954 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) Biological and medical sciences Biological effects of radiation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics |
title | Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Neutron%20Dosemeters%20in%20Radiation%20Protection%20Environments:%20An%20Investigation%20of%20Techniques%20to%20Improve%20Estimates%20of%20Dose%20Equivalent&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Naismith,%20O.F.&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft.coden=RPDODE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_SHLP7D73_X%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |