Loading…

Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent

The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260
Main Authors: Naismith, O.F., Siebert, B.R.L., Thomas, D.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3
cites
container_end_page 260
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 255
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 70
creator Naismith, O.F.
Siebert, B.R.L.
Thomas, D.J.
description The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a031954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_SHLP7D73_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkN1OGzEQhS1UpKaBd7BQbzf1X9a7uUMQmkhRGwWQUG8sZz1uTRN7sZ2IPkNfGocgJK5mNPPNmZmD0AUlI0pa_i082xDNY9hFrzdpFHsz0oTTdixO0IBKwSouSP0JDQgVomoEI5_Rl5QeCWGyQAP0fwWpDz4BDhb_gF2OwePrkGALGWLCzuOVNk5nV-rLGDJ0r-nU711Bt-BzmuBLj-d-Dym730eyiN1B98e7px0knAOeb_sY9oCnhdnqXIoFOezB06ed2-tNETpDp7Z8AedvcYjub6Z3V7Nq8fP7_OpyUXWcNbkCsmaEcN4Io1tNpTSUaWE70jLNbQuGUUuA1WbdjOXa0LZhXcvbtbVAx7Y2fIgmR90uhpQiWNXHclT8pyhRB1vVR1tVsVW92VqGvx6He506vbFR-86ldwVW11KU44aoOmIuZXh-b-v4V9WSy7GaPfxSt7PFUl5Lrh74C_KpknU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RPDODE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2667403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, B.R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkN1OGzEQhS1UpKaBd7BQbzf1X9a7uUMQmkhRGwWQUG8sZz1uTRN7sZ2IPkNfGocgJK5mNPPNmZmD0AUlI0pa_i082xDNY9hFrzdpFHsz0oTTdixO0IBKwSouSP0JDQgVomoEI5_Rl5QeCWGyQAP0fwWpDz4BDhb_gF2OwePrkGALGWLCzuOVNk5nV-rLGDJ0r-nU711Bt-BzmuBLj-d-Dym730eyiN1B98e7px0knAOeb_sY9oCnhdnqXIoFOezB06ed2-tNETpDp7Z8AedvcYjub6Z3V7Nq8fP7_OpyUXWcNbkCsmaEcN4Io1tNpTSUaWE70jLNbQuGUUuA1WbdjOXa0LZhXcvbtbVAx7Y2fIgmR90uhpQiWNXHclT8pyhRB1vVR1tVsVW92VqGvx6He506vbFR-86ldwVW11KU44aoOmIuZXh-b-v4V9WSy7GaPfxSt7PFUl5Lrh74C_KpknU</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Naismith, O.F.</creator><creator>Siebert, B.R.L.</creator><creator>Thomas, D.J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</title><author>Naismith, O.F. ; Siebert, B.R.L. ; Thomas, D.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naismith, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, B.R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, D.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naismith, O.F.</au><au>Siebert, B.R.L.</au><au>Thomas, D.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><coden>RPDODE</coden><abstract>The response of practicable neutron dosemeters for routine use generally does not match the conversion function from fluence for radiation protection quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent. As a consequence, significant errors may be encountered when monitoring in a neutron energy spectrum different from that in which the dosemeter was calibrated, which is almost inevitably the case. A database of neutron energy spectra, detector response functions, and dosimetric conversion factors has been developed, and has been used to investigate the extent of this problem. The paper examines various ways of improving dosemeter response by 'ranking' spectra and deriving correction factors based upon this ordering. In this case of area monitoring, a combination of two responses (e.g. a rem meter and TEPC) may serve to improve the measurement of dose equivalent.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 1997-04, Vol.70 (1-4), p.255-260
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a031954
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title Response of Neutron Dosemeters in Radiation Protection Environments: An Investigation of Techniques to Improve Estimates of Dose Equivalent
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Neutron%20Dosemeters%20in%20Radiation%20Protection%20Environments:%20An%20Investigation%20of%20Techniques%20to%20Improve%20Estimates%20of%20Dose%20Equivalent&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Naismith,%20O.F.&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft.coden=RPDODE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031954&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_SHLP7D73_X%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e0b2003384da9a177d12a4fc092a3f9ed21f0e26db857bd1982c939bffe15f6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true