Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends

Some questions and needs which are important for radiation dosimetry, especially in radiological protection, are discussed. Is absorbed dose an appropriate basic quantity in radiation dosimetry? What are the consequences of the assumption that the dose-effect relationship is linear at low doses and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 1999-08, Vol.84 (1-4), p.1-6
Main Author: DIETZE, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-16fd27015db8bcda99cb60de290b9b0849700330dbd99bfbb6821f4a2c1462963
cites
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 1
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 84
creator DIETZE, G
description Some questions and needs which are important for radiation dosimetry, especially in radiological protection, are discussed. Is absorbed dose an appropriate basic quantity in radiation dosimetry? What are the consequences of the assumption that the dose-effect relationship is linear at low doses and dose rates? Do problems arise in conjunction with radiation weighting factors? Which trend is seen in individual dosimetry? While these questions cannot be answered in full detail, the paper deals with some aspects of these problems only.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032694
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a032694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_PH4R1NL6_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-16fd27015db8bcda99cb60de290b9b0849700330dbd99bfbb6821f4a2c1462963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj11LAkEUhocoyKz_sES3a2c-nN3xLiwzkBIzkG6G-YQ13ZWZWdB_34ZSdHUu3ud9Dw9CtxgGGAS9b_a-CXbdtKFWmzgIOztQQAkX7Az1cMFIThnwc9QDzFheMgKX6CrGNQApxJD1EFsoW6lUNXX22MRq61I4jLJ5cNHVKXtPKrlM1TabtKkNLlsGV9t4jS58987dnG4ffUyeluNpPnt7fhk_zHJDKaQcc29JAXhodamNVUIYzcE6IkALDSUTBUBHWm2F0F5rXhLsmSIGM04Ep300Ou6a0MQYnJe7UG1VOEgM8sdf_veXnb88-Xflu2N5p6JRGx9Ubar4t1AKzoTosPyIVTG5_W-swpfkBS2Gcrr6lPMpW-DXGZcr-g3FlXEK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>DIETZE, G</creator><creatorcontrib>DIETZE, G</creatorcontrib><description>Some questions and needs which are important for radiation dosimetry, especially in radiological protection, are discussed. Is absorbed dose an appropriate basic quantity in radiation dosimetry? What are the consequences of the assumption that the dose-effect relationship is linear at low doses and dose rates? Do problems arise in conjunction with radiation weighting factors? Which trend is seen in individual dosimetry? While these questions cannot be answered in full detail, the paper deals with some aspects of these problems only.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032694</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RPDODE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 1999-08, Vol.84 (1-4), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-16fd27015db8bcda99cb60de290b9b0849700330dbd99bfbb6821f4a2c1462963</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1896499$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DIETZE, G</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>Some questions and needs which are important for radiation dosimetry, especially in radiological protection, are discussed. Is absorbed dose an appropriate basic quantity in radiation dosimetry? What are the consequences of the assumption that the dose-effect relationship is linear at low doses and dose rates? Do problems arise in conjunction with radiation weighting factors? Which trend is seen in individual dosimetry? While these questions cannot be answered in full detail, the paper deals with some aspects of these problems only.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVj11LAkEUhocoyKz_sES3a2c-nN3xLiwzkBIzkG6G-YQ13ZWZWdB_34ZSdHUu3ud9Dw9CtxgGGAS9b_a-CXbdtKFWmzgIOztQQAkX7Az1cMFIThnwc9QDzFheMgKX6CrGNQApxJD1EFsoW6lUNXX22MRq61I4jLJ5cNHVKXtPKrlM1TabtKkNLlsGV9t4jS58987dnG4ffUyeluNpPnt7fhk_zHJDKaQcc29JAXhodamNVUIYzcE6IkALDSUTBUBHWm2F0F5rXhLsmSIGM04Ep300Ou6a0MQYnJe7UG1VOEgM8sdf_veXnb88-Xflu2N5p6JRGx9Ubar4t1AKzoTosPyIVTG5_W-swpfkBS2Gcrr6lPMpW-DXGZcr-g3FlXEK</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>DIETZE, G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends</title><author>DIETZE, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-16fd27015db8bcda99cb60de290b9b0849700330dbd99bfbb6821f4a2c1462963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DIETZE, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DIETZE, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><coden>RPDODE</coden><abstract>Some questions and needs which are important for radiation dosimetry, especially in radiological protection, are discussed. Is absorbed dose an appropriate basic quantity in radiation dosimetry? What are the consequences of the assumption that the dose-effect relationship is linear at low doses and dose rates? Do problems arise in conjunction with radiation weighting factors? Which trend is seen in individual dosimetry? While these questions cannot be answered in full detail, the paper deals with some aspects of these problems only.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032694</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 1999-08, Vol.84 (1-4), p.1-6
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a032694
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title Radiation Dosimetry: Present State and Future Trends
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A12%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20Dosimetry:%20Present%20State%20and%20Future%20Trends&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=DIETZE,%20G&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft.coden=RPDODE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032694&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_PH4R1NL6_X%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-16fd27015db8bcda99cb60de290b9b0849700330dbd99bfbb6821f4a2c1462963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true