Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti

TLD results from two methods of calculating CTDI, from a single slice dose profile and from multiple scan average dose, were compared for different slice thicknesses. Two types of TL materials, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti, were employed in order to analyse the differences in energy response between th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 1999-09, Vol.85 (1-4), p.429-432, Article 429
Main Authors: Sáez Vergara, J.C., Romero, A.M., Garcia, S., Gómez, S., Fernández, C., Vázquez, J., Olivares, M.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Technology
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1c9b385b0ac8a2656456fa12432ad399df009e899b398472fb1bb7bd470df483
cites
container_end_page 432
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 429
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 85
creator Sáez Vergara, J.C.
Romero, A.M.
Garcia, S.
Gómez, S.
Fernández, C.
Vázquez, J.
Olivares, M.P.
description TLD results from two methods of calculating CTDI, from a single slice dose profile and from multiple scan average dose, were compared for different slice thicknesses. Two types of TL materials, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti, were employed in order to analyse the differences in energy response between the two phosphors. Results revealed the multiple scan average dose as the more practical and realistic method and confirmed the importance of performing appropriate energy response corrections.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032889
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a032889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_HXZ_5NKCMDR9_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1c9b385b0ac8a2656456fa12432ad399df009e899b398472fb1bb7bd470df483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtvEzEUhS1EJULLf7AQy05qjz0PZwWa0IdIKEKDVLGx7oztxCWxR7Yjkj0_nIlSQLBidXWl75xz70HoNSVTSgS78nvjg3r0u-BgE6dhUFMgLK9r8QxNaMXzjHFSPkcTQjnPap6TF-hljI-E5JUo-AT9aPx2gGCjd9gb3H73eKnT2qt4XO-7BNZZt8JprfER3SWtcOu3fhVgWB_w3EeN75zSe9wd8Jd4ZOfWGB20S7hd4CUkHex43Awv7PVsubpsdpefMDj1a2_tBTozI6FfPc1z1F6_b5vbbHF_c9e8W2T9-FLKaC86Vhcdgb6GvCxKXpQGaM5ZDooJoQwhQtdipETNq9x0tOuqTvGKKMNrdo5mJ9s--BiDNnIIdgvhICmRxzrl33XKsU75VOcofnMSDxB72JgArrfxj4PgZUmrEXv7T0ZvEyTrXQpgN_-XlJ0sbEx6_zsBwjdZVqwq5O3DV1l8_NAs55-FfGA_AdKZovg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sáez Vergara, J.C. ; Romero, A.M. ; Garcia, S. ; Gómez, S. ; Fernández, C. ; Vázquez, J. ; Olivares, M.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sáez Vergara, J.C. ; Romero, A.M. ; Garcia, S. ; Gómez, S. ; Fernández, C. ; Vázquez, J. ; Olivares, M.P.</creatorcontrib><description>TLD results from two methods of calculating CTDI, from a single slice dose profile and from multiple scan average dose, were compared for different slice thicknesses. Two types of TL materials, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti, were employed in order to analyse the differences in energy response between the two phosphors. Results revealed the multiple scan average dose as the more practical and realistic method and confirmed the importance of performing appropriate energy response corrections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RPDODE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 1999-09, Vol.85 (1-4), p.429-432, Article 429</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1c9b385b0ac8a2656456fa12432ad399df009e899b398472fb1bb7bd470df483</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1946617$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sáez Vergara, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivares, M.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>TLD results from two methods of calculating CTDI, from a single slice dose profile and from multiple scan average dose, were compared for different slice thicknesses. Two types of TL materials, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti, were employed in order to analyse the differences in energy response between the two phosphors. Results revealed the multiple scan average dose as the more practical and realistic method and confirmed the importance of performing appropriate energy response corrections.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtvEzEUhS1EJULLf7AQy05qjz0PZwWa0IdIKEKDVLGx7oztxCWxR7Yjkj0_nIlSQLBidXWl75xz70HoNSVTSgS78nvjg3r0u-BgE6dhUFMgLK9r8QxNaMXzjHFSPkcTQjnPap6TF-hljI-E5JUo-AT9aPx2gGCjd9gb3H73eKnT2qt4XO-7BNZZt8JprfER3SWtcOu3fhVgWB_w3EeN75zSe9wd8Jd4ZOfWGB20S7hd4CUkHex43Awv7PVsubpsdpefMDj1a2_tBTozI6FfPc1z1F6_b5vbbHF_c9e8W2T9-FLKaC86Vhcdgb6GvCxKXpQGaM5ZDooJoQwhQtdipETNq9x0tOuqTvGKKMNrdo5mJ9s--BiDNnIIdgvhICmRxzrl33XKsU75VOcofnMSDxB72JgArrfxj4PgZUmrEXv7T0ZvEyTrXQpgN_-XlJ0sbEx6_zsBwjdZVqwq5O3DV1l8_NAs55-FfGA_AdKZovg</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Sáez Vergara, J.C.</creator><creator>Romero, A.M.</creator><creator>Garcia, S.</creator><creator>Gómez, S.</creator><creator>Fernández, C.</creator><creator>Vázquez, J.</creator><creator>Olivares, M.P.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti</title><author>Sáez Vergara, J.C. ; Romero, A.M. ; Garcia, S. ; Gómez, S. ; Fernández, C. ; Vázquez, J. ; Olivares, M.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1c9b385b0ac8a2656456fa12432ad399df009e899b398472fb1bb7bd470df483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sáez Vergara, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivares, M.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sáez Vergara, J.C.</au><au>Romero, A.M.</au><au>Garcia, S.</au><au>Gómez, S.</au><au>Fernández, C.</au><au>Vázquez, J.</au><au>Olivares, M.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>429-432</pages><artnum>429</artnum><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><coden>RPDODE</coden><abstract>TLD results from two methods of calculating CTDI, from a single slice dose profile and from multiple scan average dose, were compared for different slice thicknesses. Two types of TL materials, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti, were employed in order to analyse the differences in energy response between the two phosphors. Results revealed the multiple scan average dose as the more practical and realistic method and confirmed the importance of performing appropriate energy response corrections.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032889</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 1999-09, Vol.85 (1-4), p.429-432, Article 429
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_rpd_a032889
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Technology
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
title Comparison of Two Methods of Obtaining the Computed Tomography Dose Index by Using Different TL Materials: LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Methods%20of%20Obtaining%20the%20Computed%20Tomography%20Dose%20Index%20by%20Using%20Different%20TL%20Materials:%20LiF:Mg,Cu,P%20and%20LiF:Mg,Ti&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Sa%CC%81ez%20Vergara,%20J.C.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=429-432&rft.artnum=429&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft.coden=RPDODE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032889&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_HXZ_5NKCMDR9_X%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-1c9b385b0ac8a2656456fa12432ad399df009e899b398472fb1bb7bd470df483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true