Loading…

Grazing Eclipsing Dwarf Nova CW Monocerotis: Dwarf Nova-Type Outburst in a Possible Intermediate Polar?

We observed the 2002 October–November outburst of the dwarf nova CW Mon. The outburst showed a clear signature of a premaximum halt, and a more rapid decline after reaching the outburst maximum. On two separate occasions, during the premaximum stage and near the outburst maximum, shallow eclipses we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 2003-04, Vol.55 (2), p.489-498
Main Authors: Kato, Taichi, Uemura, Makoto, Kiyota, Seiichiro, Tanabe, Kenji, Koizumi, Mitsuo, Kida, Mayumi, Nishi, Yuichi, Tanaka, Sawa, Ueoka, Rie, Yasui, Hideki, Vanmunster, Tonny, Nogami, Daisaku, Yamaoka, Hitoshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We observed the 2002 October–November outburst of the dwarf nova CW Mon. The outburst showed a clear signature of a premaximum halt, and a more rapid decline after reaching the outburst maximum. On two separate occasions, during the premaximum stage and near the outburst maximum, shallow eclipses were recorded. This finding confirms the previously suggested possibility of the grazing eclipsing nature of this system. The separate occurrence of the eclipses and the premaximum halt can be understood as being the result of a combination of a two-step ignition of an outburst and the inside-out propagation of the heating wave. We detected a coherent short-period (0.02549 d) signal on two subsequent nights around the optical maximum. This signal was likely present during the maximum phase of the 2000 January outburst. We interpret this signal as being a signature of the intermediate polar (IP) type pulses. The rather strange outburst properties, strong and hard X-ray emission, and the low luminosity of the outburst maximum might be understood as a consequence of the supposed IP nature. The ratio between the suggested spin period and the orbital period, however, is rather unusual for a system having an orbital period of $\sim 0.176 \,\mathrm{d}$ .
ISSN:0004-6264
2053-051X
DOI:10.1093/pasj/55.2.489