Loading…

Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states

Welfare provision is often conceived through the lens of decommodification and analysed in (re)distributive terms. This article argues that a distributive approach does not sufficiently capture the complexity of 21st century welfare state dynamics. It proposes re-conceptualizing provision as a mix o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Socio-economic review 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.479-500
Main Authors: Hemerijck, Anton, Ronchi, Stefano, Plavgo, Ilze
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13
container_end_page 500
container_issue 1
container_start_page 479
container_title Socio-economic review
container_volume 21
creator Hemerijck, Anton
Ronchi, Stefano
Plavgo, Ilze
description Welfare provision is often conceived through the lens of decommodification and analysed in (re)distributive terms. This article argues that a distributive approach does not sufficiently capture the complexity of 21st century welfare state dynamics. It proposes re-conceptualizing provision as a mix of three policy functions: raising and maintaining human capital stock; easing the flow of gendered life-course and labour-market transitions; guaranteeing social safety-net buffers. This analytical perspective allows theorizing life-course multiplier effects and policy (non-)complementarities, both at the level of individual objective and subjective well-being and in terms of aggregate employment, poverty and fiscal sustainability. This perspective also enables us to extend the temporal horizon of welfare politics beyond short-term electoral logics for explaining welfare reform. The article underscores how methodological pluralism remains key for understanding contemporary welfare states, and for grasping welfare outcomes and institutional change in a research endeavour that involves both generalization and contextualization.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ser/mwac035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ser_mwac035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1093_ser_mwac035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LxDAQxYMouK6e_Adyl7r5bJujLH7BggcVvJVpNpFqmy6Z1LL_vVlcvMz8YN48Ho-Qa85uOTNyhS6uhhksk_qELLiqdJHHx-k_l_ycXCB-MSYqVZsFmV9H20FPu_DjMA0uJApIgdoxWLdLUz75CIObx_hN_RgpBOj32IVPOru-L1p3wOjSFEP-C9vMWTZgdqSCY6I2e05xf5B7iI5iguTwkpx56NFdHfeSvD_cv62fis3L4_P6blNYYVgqjNE1N9wqIyS02jIlpAIOXlVgW1UaK0RpVSnbqtZbz3QptdcGpN4qLzyXS3Lz52vjiJizNbvYDRD3DWfNobMmd9YcO5O__CFjIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states</title><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Hemerijck, Anton ; Ronchi, Stefano ; Plavgo, Ilze</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemerijck, Anton ; Ronchi, Stefano ; Plavgo, Ilze</creatorcontrib><description>Welfare provision is often conceived through the lens of decommodification and analysed in (re)distributive terms. This article argues that a distributive approach does not sufficiently capture the complexity of 21st century welfare state dynamics. It proposes re-conceptualizing provision as a mix of three policy functions: raising and maintaining human capital stock; easing the flow of gendered life-course and labour-market transitions; guaranteeing social safety-net buffers. This analytical perspective allows theorizing life-course multiplier effects and policy (non-)complementarities, both at the level of individual objective and subjective well-being and in terms of aggregate employment, poverty and fiscal sustainability. This perspective also enables us to extend the temporal horizon of welfare politics beyond short-term electoral logics for explaining welfare reform. The article underscores how methodological pluralism remains key for understanding contemporary welfare states, and for grasping welfare outcomes and institutional change in a research endeavour that involves both generalization and contextualization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-147X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac035</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Socio-economic review, 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.479-500</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6821-7148 ; 0000-0001-8695-1250 ; 0000-0002-6226-3303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemerijck, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronchi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plavgo, Ilze</creatorcontrib><title>Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states</title><title>Socio-economic review</title><description>Welfare provision is often conceived through the lens of decommodification and analysed in (re)distributive terms. This article argues that a distributive approach does not sufficiently capture the complexity of 21st century welfare state dynamics. It proposes re-conceptualizing provision as a mix of three policy functions: raising and maintaining human capital stock; easing the flow of gendered life-course and labour-market transitions; guaranteeing social safety-net buffers. This analytical perspective allows theorizing life-course multiplier effects and policy (non-)complementarities, both at the level of individual objective and subjective well-being and in terms of aggregate employment, poverty and fiscal sustainability. This perspective also enables us to extend the temporal horizon of welfare politics beyond short-term electoral logics for explaining welfare reform. The article underscores how methodological pluralism remains key for understanding contemporary welfare states, and for grasping welfare outcomes and institutional change in a research endeavour that involves both generalization and contextualization.</description><issn>1475-1461</issn><issn>1475-147X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1LxDAQxYMouK6e_Adyl7r5bJujLH7BggcVvJVpNpFqmy6Z1LL_vVlcvMz8YN48Ho-Qa85uOTNyhS6uhhksk_qELLiqdJHHx-k_l_ycXCB-MSYqVZsFmV9H20FPu_DjMA0uJApIgdoxWLdLUz75CIObx_hN_RgpBOj32IVPOru-L1p3wOjSFEP-C9vMWTZgdqSCY6I2e05xf5B7iI5iguTwkpx56NFdHfeSvD_cv62fis3L4_P6blNYYVgqjNE1N9wqIyS02jIlpAIOXlVgW1UaK0RpVSnbqtZbz3QptdcGpN4qLzyXS3Lz52vjiJizNbvYDRD3DWfNobMmd9YcO5O__CFjIQ</recordid><startdate>20230317</startdate><enddate>20230317</enddate><creator>Hemerijck, Anton</creator><creator>Ronchi, Stefano</creator><creator>Plavgo, Ilze</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-7148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-1250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-3303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230317</creationdate><title>Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states</title><author>Hemerijck, Anton ; Ronchi, Stefano ; Plavgo, Ilze</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemerijck, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronchi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plavgo, Ilze</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemerijck, Anton</au><au>Ronchi, Stefano</au><au>Plavgo, Ilze</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic review</jtitle><date>2023-03-17</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>479-500</pages><issn>1475-1461</issn><eissn>1475-147X</eissn><abstract>Welfare provision is often conceived through the lens of decommodification and analysed in (re)distributive terms. This article argues that a distributive approach does not sufficiently capture the complexity of 21st century welfare state dynamics. It proposes re-conceptualizing provision as a mix of three policy functions: raising and maintaining human capital stock; easing the flow of gendered life-course and labour-market transitions; guaranteeing social safety-net buffers. This analytical perspective allows theorizing life-course multiplier effects and policy (non-)complementarities, both at the level of individual objective and subjective well-being and in terms of aggregate employment, poverty and fiscal sustainability. This perspective also enables us to extend the temporal horizon of welfare politics beyond short-term electoral logics for explaining welfare reform. The article underscores how methodological pluralism remains key for understanding contemporary welfare states, and for grasping welfare outcomes and institutional change in a research endeavour that involves both generalization and contextualization.</abstract><doi>10.1093/ser/mwac035</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-7148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-1250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-3303</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-1461
ispartof Socio-economic review, 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.479-500
issn 1475-1461
1475-147X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ser_mwac035
source EconLit with Full Text; Oxford Journals Online
title Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20investment%20as%20a%20conceptual%20framework%20for%20analysing%20well-being%20returns%20and%20reforms%20in%2021st%20century%20welfare%20states&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20review&rft.au=Hemerijck,%20Anton&rft.date=2023-03-17&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=479-500&rft.issn=1475-1461&rft.eissn=1475-147X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ser/mwac035&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1093_ser_mwac035%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-9958191c4923ab5c04234a1af47acb469c226c463b785df05635f59a35d4f2f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true