Loading…

Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs

Abstract Sexual dimorphism is a prevalent feature of sexually reproducing organisms yet its presence in dinosaurs has recently been questioned. However, the inferred absence of sexual dimorphism may be a methodological artefact, rooted in the lack of systematic knowledge concerning how sexual dimorp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zoological journal of the Linnean Society 2021-08, Vol.192 (4), p.1029-1044
Main Author: Motani, Ryosuke
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73
container_end_page 1044
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1029
container_title Zoological journal of the Linnean Society
container_volume 192
creator Motani, Ryosuke
description Abstract Sexual dimorphism is a prevalent feature of sexually reproducing organisms yet its presence in dinosaurs has recently been questioned. However, the inferred absence of sexual dimorphism may be a methodological artefact, rooted in the lack of systematic knowledge concerning how sexual dimorphism of living animals behaves statistically. To start building such knowledge, I re-analysed published data of 139 species of living animals that are sexually dimorphic. The previous method used for dinosaurs recognized only 5% of the living species correctly as dimorphic. This low rate is largely caused by the tilting of ordinated multivariate space due to interactions between size and shape dimorphisms, low signal/noise ratios and inclusion of outliers. The rate can be improved to 50% by modifying the method but not further, unless the information on the sex of individual specimens is used. Such information is unavailable in dinosaurs, so sexual dimorphism probably cannot be established for a large proportion of sexually dimorphic dinosaurs. At the same time, about 32% of the 139 are strongly sexually dimorphic, and can be re-sexed from shape with misclassification rates below 0.05. A reassessment of dinosaurian data suggests that sexual dimorphism likely existed at least in some species, such as Allosaurus fragilis.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_zoolinnean_zlaa181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KxDAUhYMoWEdfwFVeoE5ymzTJRpDBPxhwoa5L2iZjpE1K0hFnnt7IDLh1dbj3nHO5fAhdU3JDiaqW-xAG573RfrkftKaSnqAiO3VZ1QxOUUEIsJIRCefoIqVPkmfJaYFuX803Nml2o55d8NjGMOIxxOkjDGGzw87jwX05v8Ha58yQsva4dz4kvY3pEp3ZvDRXR12g94f7t9VTuX55fF7drcuuAjWXQoneVF0NhmvONSijAKgQhoOU2iognDDGaa9I3xpVty3jVoAwss6eFdUCweFuF0NK0dhmivmduGsoaX4JNH8EmiOBXCoPpbCd_pP_AY3jY4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Motani, Ryosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Motani, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Sexual dimorphism is a prevalent feature of sexually reproducing organisms yet its presence in dinosaurs has recently been questioned. However, the inferred absence of sexual dimorphism may be a methodological artefact, rooted in the lack of systematic knowledge concerning how sexual dimorphism of living animals behaves statistically. To start building such knowledge, I re-analysed published data of 139 species of living animals that are sexually dimorphic. The previous method used for dinosaurs recognized only 5% of the living species correctly as dimorphic. This low rate is largely caused by the tilting of ordinated multivariate space due to interactions between size and shape dimorphisms, low signal/noise ratios and inclusion of outliers. The rate can be improved to 50% by modifying the method but not further, unless the information on the sex of individual specimens is used. Such information is unavailable in dinosaurs, so sexual dimorphism probably cannot be established for a large proportion of sexually dimorphic dinosaurs. At the same time, about 32% of the 139 are strongly sexually dimorphic, and can be re-sexed from shape with misclassification rates below 0.05. A reassessment of dinosaurian data suggests that sexual dimorphism likely existed at least in some species, such as Allosaurus fragilis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-3642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society, 2021-08, Vol.192 (4), p.1029-1044</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Linnean Society of London. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5022-1053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motani, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs</title><title>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</title><description>Abstract Sexual dimorphism is a prevalent feature of sexually reproducing organisms yet its presence in dinosaurs has recently been questioned. However, the inferred absence of sexual dimorphism may be a methodological artefact, rooted in the lack of systematic knowledge concerning how sexual dimorphism of living animals behaves statistically. To start building such knowledge, I re-analysed published data of 139 species of living animals that are sexually dimorphic. The previous method used for dinosaurs recognized only 5% of the living species correctly as dimorphic. This low rate is largely caused by the tilting of ordinated multivariate space due to interactions between size and shape dimorphisms, low signal/noise ratios and inclusion of outliers. The rate can be improved to 50% by modifying the method but not further, unless the information on the sex of individual specimens is used. Such information is unavailable in dinosaurs, so sexual dimorphism probably cannot be established for a large proportion of sexually dimorphic dinosaurs. At the same time, about 32% of the 139 are strongly sexually dimorphic, and can be re-sexed from shape with misclassification rates below 0.05. A reassessment of dinosaurian data suggests that sexual dimorphism likely existed at least in some species, such as Allosaurus fragilis.</description><issn>0024-4082</issn><issn>1096-3642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KxDAUhYMoWEdfwFVeoE5ymzTJRpDBPxhwoa5L2iZjpE1K0hFnnt7IDLh1dbj3nHO5fAhdU3JDiaqW-xAG573RfrkftKaSnqAiO3VZ1QxOUUEIsJIRCefoIqVPkmfJaYFuX803Nml2o55d8NjGMOIxxOkjDGGzw87jwX05v8Ha58yQsva4dz4kvY3pEp3ZvDRXR12g94f7t9VTuX55fF7drcuuAjWXQoneVF0NhmvONSijAKgQhoOU2iognDDGaa9I3xpVty3jVoAwss6eFdUCweFuF0NK0dhmivmduGsoaX4JNH8EmiOBXCoPpbCd_pP_AY3jY4I</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Motani, Ryosuke</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-1053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs</title><author>Motani, Ryosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motani, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motani, Ryosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs</atitle><jtitle>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>192</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1029</spage><epage>1044</epage><pages>1029-1044</pages><issn>0024-4082</issn><eissn>1096-3642</eissn><abstract>Abstract Sexual dimorphism is a prevalent feature of sexually reproducing organisms yet its presence in dinosaurs has recently been questioned. However, the inferred absence of sexual dimorphism may be a methodological artefact, rooted in the lack of systematic knowledge concerning how sexual dimorphism of living animals behaves statistically. To start building such knowledge, I re-analysed published data of 139 species of living animals that are sexually dimorphic. The previous method used for dinosaurs recognized only 5% of the living species correctly as dimorphic. This low rate is largely caused by the tilting of ordinated multivariate space due to interactions between size and shape dimorphisms, low signal/noise ratios and inclusion of outliers. The rate can be improved to 50% by modifying the method but not further, unless the information on the sex of individual specimens is used. Such information is unavailable in dinosaurs, so sexual dimorphism probably cannot be established for a large proportion of sexually dimorphic dinosaurs. At the same time, about 32% of the 139 are strongly sexually dimorphic, and can be re-sexed from shape with misclassification rates below 0.05. A reassessment of dinosaurian data suggests that sexual dimorphism likely existed at least in some species, such as Allosaurus fragilis.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-1053</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-4082
ispartof Zoological journal of the Linnean Society, 2021-08, Vol.192 (4), p.1029-1044
issn 0024-4082
1096-3642
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_zoolinnean_zlaa181
source Oxford Journals Online
title Sex estimation from morphology in living animals and dinosaurs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20estimation%20from%20morphology%20in%20living%20animals%20and%20dinosaurs&rft.jtitle=Zoological%20journal%20of%20the%20Linnean%20Society&rft.au=Motani,%20Ryosuke&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1029&rft.epage=1044&rft.pages=1029-1044&rft.issn=0024-4082&rft.eissn=1096-3642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-797de3c62e5a55a29e922177e5288af920504451d90dbe96bb45f727e86920f73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa181&rfr_iscdi=true