Loading…

Detection of Erwinia amylovora by nested PCR and PCR-dot-blot and reverse-blot hybridizations

The sensitivity and specificity of four methods based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of Erwinia amylovora were compared. A previously developed single-round PCR assay was used to amplify a specific 1-kb DNA fragment of plasmid pEA29, known to be unique to and conserved in E. am...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phytopathology 1995-05, Vol.85 (5), p.618-623
Main Authors: McManus, P.S. (Michigan State University, East Lansing.), Jones, A.L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The sensitivity and specificity of four methods based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of Erwinia amylovora were compared. A previously developed single-round PCR assay was used to amplify a specific 1-kb DNA fragment of plasmid pEA29, known to be unique to and conserved in E. amylovora. The ends of the 1-kb single-round PCR product were sequenced, and two new oligonucleotide primers were designed from sequences internal to the original primers and used in nested PCR. These primers directed amplification of a 844-bp fragment from the 1-kb first-round PCR product directly from E amylovora cells but not from other bacteria associated with apple. Less than one cell of E. amylovora from pure culture was detected with nested PCR--an increase in sensitivity of 1,000-fold compared to single-round PCR. The lower limit of detection of PCR-dot-blot and reverse-blot hybridization methods was approximately 20 cells. Weak positive signals were sometimes produced by bacteria other than E. amylovora in hybridization experiments but only if nonspecific PCR products were visible on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. When asymptomatic apple tissue was screened, E. amylovora was detected in 61, 84, and 100% of leaf samples; 0, 66, and 80% of axillary bud samples; and 4, 27, and 75% of mature fruit calyx samples by first-round PCR, PCR-dot-blot hybridization, and nested PCR, respectively. The potential applications of each method are discussed
ISSN:0031-949X
1943-7684
DOI:10.1094/Phyto-85-618