Loading…

Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia

The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative potency of eltanolone, a new steroid hypnotic, and propofol and thiopental when used for induction of general anesthesia. In addition, the induction characteristics of propofol and eltanolone were compared. One hundred seventy-f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 1994, Vol.80 (1), p.36-41
Main Authors: VAN HEMELRIJCK, J, MULLER, P, VAN AKEN, H, WHITE, P. F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-57834d5a564a9474d56dcf78098f24257f7a72cb8c4220175bebdf0dec56a9983
cites
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 80
creator VAN HEMELRIJCK, J
MULLER, P
VAN AKEN, H
WHITE, P. F
description The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative potency of eltanolone, a new steroid hypnotic, and propofol and thiopental when used for induction of general anesthesia. In addition, the induction characteristics of propofol and eltanolone were compared. One hundred seventy-five patients, premedicated with lorazepam 1 mg orally, randomly received one of six different doses of either eltanolone or propofol. The probability of successful induction (defined as not responsive to verbal commands within 2 min) was related to the logarithm of the dose for each drug by means of logistic regression analysis. Estimates of ED50 and ED95 for each drug were obtained. The incidence of side effects was compared for eltanolone and propofol. The potency of thiopental was determined in a parallel study, using an identical methodology in 105 patients receiving one of seven different doses of the barbiturate. The relative potency of eltanolone was 3.2 times (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.8) greater than propofol and 6.0 times (5.3-6.9) greater than thiopental. ED50 and ED95 values for eltanolone were 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.82 (0.68-1.28) mg.kg-1, respectively. Compared to propofol, induction of anesthesia with eltanolone is characterized by a lower incidence of injection pain (3.5% vs. 58%) and apnea (1.2% vs. 11.2%). Eltanolone appeared to be an effective induction agent that is 3.2 times more potent than propofol and 6 times more potent than thiopental. Its use was associated with less pain on injection than was propofol.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000542_199401000_00009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8291727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-57834d5a564a9474d56dcf78098f24257f7a72cb8c4220175bebdf0dec56a9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0JQg4eXc1nkxyl-AUFQep5mWYTurJNlk0q9N-btbVzmXnvzRuYhxCm5IESox7JWFKwihojCC2gGhlzhqZUMl1RquQ5mhaKV5wwdomuUvouUEmuJ2iimaGKqSlafboOcvvjcB-zC3aPo8euyxBiF4O7x_0Q--hjd48hNDhv2ti7kKHDPg64Dc3O5jaG0QXBpbxxqYVrdOGhS-7m2Gfo6-V5tXirlh-v74unZWUFE7mSSnPRSJBzAUaoMs4b65UmRnsmmFRegWJ2rcs6I-WjtVs3njTOyjkYo_kM6cNdO8SUBufrfmi3MOxrSuoxp_o_p_qU0x9livX2YO13661rTsZjMEW_O-qQLHR-gGDbdFrjXGsmNf8F2oJwKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J ; MULLER, P ; VAN AKEN, H ; WHITE, P. F</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J ; MULLER, P ; VAN AKEN, H ; WHITE, P. F</creatorcontrib><description>The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative potency of eltanolone, a new steroid hypnotic, and propofol and thiopental when used for induction of general anesthesia. In addition, the induction characteristics of propofol and eltanolone were compared. One hundred seventy-five patients, premedicated with lorazepam 1 mg orally, randomly received one of six different doses of either eltanolone or propofol. The probability of successful induction (defined as not responsive to verbal commands within 2 min) was related to the logarithm of the dose for each drug by means of logistic regression analysis. Estimates of ED50 and ED95 for each drug were obtained. The incidence of side effects was compared for eltanolone and propofol. The potency of thiopental was determined in a parallel study, using an identical methodology in 105 patients receiving one of seven different doses of the barbiturate. The relative potency of eltanolone was 3.2 times (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.8) greater than propofol and 6.0 times (5.3-6.9) greater than thiopental. ED50 and ED95 values for eltanolone were 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.82 (0.68-1.28) mg.kg-1, respectively. Compared to propofol, induction of anesthesia with eltanolone is characterized by a lower incidence of injection pain (3.5% vs. 58%) and apnea (1.2% vs. 11.2%). Eltanolone appeared to be an effective induction agent that is 3.2 times more potent than propofol and 6 times more potent than thiopental. Its use was associated with less pain on injection than was propofol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8291727</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnanolone - adverse effects ; Propofol - adverse effects ; Thiopental</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1994, Vol.80 (1), p.36-41</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-57834d5a564a9474d56dcf78098f24257f7a72cb8c4220175bebdf0dec56a9983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3388258$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8291727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN AKEN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, P. F</creatorcontrib><title>Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative potency of eltanolone, a new steroid hypnotic, and propofol and thiopental when used for induction of general anesthesia. In addition, the induction characteristics of propofol and eltanolone were compared. One hundred seventy-five patients, premedicated with lorazepam 1 mg orally, randomly received one of six different doses of either eltanolone or propofol. The probability of successful induction (defined as not responsive to verbal commands within 2 min) was related to the logarithm of the dose for each drug by means of logistic regression analysis. Estimates of ED50 and ED95 for each drug were obtained. The incidence of side effects was compared for eltanolone and propofol. The potency of thiopental was determined in a parallel study, using an identical methodology in 105 patients receiving one of seven different doses of the barbiturate. The relative potency of eltanolone was 3.2 times (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.8) greater than propofol and 6.0 times (5.3-6.9) greater than thiopental. ED50 and ED95 values for eltanolone were 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.82 (0.68-1.28) mg.kg-1, respectively. Compared to propofol, induction of anesthesia with eltanolone is characterized by a lower incidence of injection pain (3.5% vs. 58%) and apnea (1.2% vs. 11.2%). Eltanolone appeared to be an effective induction agent that is 3.2 times more potent than propofol and 6 times more potent than thiopental. Its use was associated with less pain on injection than was propofol.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnanolone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Thiopental</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0JQg4eXc1nkxyl-AUFQep5mWYTurJNlk0q9N-btbVzmXnvzRuYhxCm5IESox7JWFKwihojCC2gGhlzhqZUMl1RquQ5mhaKV5wwdomuUvouUEmuJ2iimaGKqSlafboOcvvjcB-zC3aPo8euyxBiF4O7x_0Q--hjd48hNDhv2ti7kKHDPg64Dc3O5jaG0QXBpbxxqYVrdOGhS-7m2Gfo6-V5tXirlh-v74unZWUFE7mSSnPRSJBzAUaoMs4b65UmRnsmmFRegWJ2rcs6I-WjtVs3njTOyjkYo_kM6cNdO8SUBufrfmi3MOxrSuoxp_o_p_qU0x9livX2YO13661rTsZjMEW_O-qQLHR-gGDbdFrjXGsmNf8F2oJwKg</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J</creator><creator>MULLER, P</creator><creator>VAN AKEN, H</creator><creator>WHITE, P. F</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia</title><author>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J ; MULLER, P ; VAN AKEN, H ; WHITE, P. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-57834d5a564a9474d56dcf78098f24257f7a72cb8c4220175bebdf0dec56a9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnanolone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Thiopental</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN AKEN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, P. F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN HEMELRIJCK, J</au><au>MULLER, P</au><au>VAN AKEN, H</au><au>WHITE, P. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>36-41</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative potency of eltanolone, a new steroid hypnotic, and propofol and thiopental when used for induction of general anesthesia. In addition, the induction characteristics of propofol and eltanolone were compared. One hundred seventy-five patients, premedicated with lorazepam 1 mg orally, randomly received one of six different doses of either eltanolone or propofol. The probability of successful induction (defined as not responsive to verbal commands within 2 min) was related to the logarithm of the dose for each drug by means of logistic regression analysis. Estimates of ED50 and ED95 for each drug were obtained. The incidence of side effects was compared for eltanolone and propofol. The potency of thiopental was determined in a parallel study, using an identical methodology in 105 patients receiving one of seven different doses of the barbiturate. The relative potency of eltanolone was 3.2 times (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.8) greater than propofol and 6.0 times (5.3-6.9) greater than thiopental. ED50 and ED95 values for eltanolone were 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.82 (0.68-1.28) mg.kg-1, respectively. Compared to propofol, induction of anesthesia with eltanolone is characterized by a lower incidence of injection pain (3.5% vs. 58%) and apnea (1.2% vs. 11.2%). Eltanolone appeared to be an effective induction agent that is 3.2 times more potent than propofol and 6 times more potent than thiopental. Its use was associated with less pain on injection than was propofol.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>8291727</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-199401000-00009</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1994, Vol.80 (1), p.36-41
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000542_199401000_00009
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesia, General
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Blood Pressure - physiology
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnanolone - adverse effects
Propofol - adverse effects
Thiopental
title Relative potency of eltanolone, propofol, and thiopental for induction of anesthesia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20potency%20of%20eltanolone,%20propofol,%20and%20thiopental%20for%20induction%20of%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=VAN%20HEMELRIJCK,%20J&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=36-41&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-199401000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8291727%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-57834d5a564a9474d56dcf78098f24257f7a72cb8c4220175bebdf0dec56a9983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8291727&rfr_iscdi=true