Loading…
Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials
The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2004-12, Vol.101 (6), p.1454-1463 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1463 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1454 |
container_title | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | BÜTTNER, Michael WALDER, Bernhard VON ELM, Erik TRAMER, Martin R |
description | The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), and radiation therapy (24). The relative benefit to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting during 24 h with 0.5-4 mg haloperidol compared with placebo was 1.26-1.51 (number needed to treat, 3.2-5.1), without evidence of dose responsiveness; 0.25 mg was not antiemetic. With 1 mg haloperidol, the relative benefit to stop postoperative nausea or vomiting during 2-4 h compared with placebo was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00; number needed to treat, 6); with 2 mg, the relative benefit was 1.73 (1.11-2.68; number needed to treat, 4). In gastroenterology, 2 mg haloperidol was more effective than 1 mg. For chemotherapy and radiation therapy, no conclusions could be drawn. With 4 mg, one patient had extrapyramidal symptoms. With 5 mg, sedation was increased, with a relative risk of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.52; number needed to treat, 4.4). There were no reports on cardiac toxicity. Postoperatively and in gastroenterology, haloperidol is antiemetic, with minimal toxicity. For other clinical settings and for children, valid data are unavailable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000542_200412000_00028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15564955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-a2bf85005f479a869d54fa29d762e745fe508db2a24cc4e09ec7f9e09c17cab33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0LkovHaJJNNtmTlOJHoeBFz0s2HzS62y3JLqK_3qmtNjB5b4Y3A-8hhBm9ZbRSd3T3pOCEUyoYfJRAcX2CpkxyTRhT8hRNYVaQgnI-QRc5v0OrZKHP0YRJWYpKyin6WGbc9p_E9dnjtWn7rU_R9S02eMw-jEA2Q_SdH6K9x3MMxBCzMe1Xjhn3AW_Hpo157R0IHR43xz7BoO_iN9AhRdPmS3QWAPzVAWfo7fHhdfFMVi9Py8V8RSzX5UAMb4KW4C8IVRldVk6KYHjlVMm9EjJ4SbVruOHCWuFp5a0KFaBlypqmKGZI7-_a1OecfKi3KXYmfdWM1rv86r_86v_86t_8YPV6vwo2Ou-Oi4fAQHBzEJhsTRvApI35qCsLOMfL4geQ3Hmx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>BÜTTNER, Michael ; WALDER, Bernhard ; VON ELM, Erik ; TRAMER, Martin R</creator><creatorcontrib>BÜTTNER, Michael ; WALDER, Bernhard ; VON ELM, Erik ; TRAMER, Martin R</creatorcontrib><description>The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), and radiation therapy (24). The relative benefit to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting during 24 h with 0.5-4 mg haloperidol compared with placebo was 1.26-1.51 (number needed to treat, 3.2-5.1), without evidence of dose responsiveness; 0.25 mg was not antiemetic. With 1 mg haloperidol, the relative benefit to stop postoperative nausea or vomiting during 2-4 h compared with placebo was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00; number needed to treat, 6); with 2 mg, the relative benefit was 1.73 (1.11-2.68; number needed to treat, 4). In gastroenterology, 2 mg haloperidol was more effective than 1 mg. For chemotherapy and radiation therapy, no conclusions could be drawn. With 4 mg, one patient had extrapyramidal symptoms. With 5 mg, sedation was increased, with a relative risk of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.52; number needed to treat, 4.4). There were no reports on cardiac toxicity. Postoperatively and in gastroenterology, haloperidol is antiemetic, with minimal toxicity. For other clinical settings and for children, valid data are unavailable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15564955</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Antiemetics ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - complications ; Haloperidol - adverse effects ; Haloperidol - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control ; Radiotherapy - adverse effects ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Vomiting - etiology ; Vomiting - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2004-12, Vol.101 (6), p.1454-1463</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16312026$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15564955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BÜTTNER, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDER, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON ELM, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRAMER, Martin R</creatorcontrib><title>Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), and radiation therapy (24). The relative benefit to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting during 24 h with 0.5-4 mg haloperidol compared with placebo was 1.26-1.51 (number needed to treat, 3.2-5.1), without evidence of dose responsiveness; 0.25 mg was not antiemetic. With 1 mg haloperidol, the relative benefit to stop postoperative nausea or vomiting during 2-4 h compared with placebo was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00; number needed to treat, 6); with 2 mg, the relative benefit was 1.73 (1.11-2.68; number needed to treat, 4). In gastroenterology, 2 mg haloperidol was more effective than 1 mg. For chemotherapy and radiation therapy, no conclusions could be drawn. With 4 mg, one patient had extrapyramidal symptoms. With 5 mg, sedation was increased, with a relative risk of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.52; number needed to treat, 4.4). There were no reports on cardiac toxicity. Postoperatively and in gastroenterology, haloperidol is antiemetic, with minimal toxicity. For other clinical settings and for children, valid data are unavailable.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Antiemetics</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Haloperidol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Haloperidol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Vomiting - etiology</subject><subject>Vomiting - prevention & control</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0LkovHaJJNNtmTlOJHoeBFz0s2HzS62y3JLqK_3qmtNjB5b4Y3A-8hhBm9ZbRSd3T3pOCEUyoYfJRAcX2CpkxyTRhT8hRNYVaQgnI-QRc5v0OrZKHP0YRJWYpKyin6WGbc9p_E9dnjtWn7rU_R9S02eMw-jEA2Q_SdH6K9x3MMxBCzMe1Xjhn3AW_Hpo157R0IHR43xz7BoO_iN9AhRdPmS3QWAPzVAWfo7fHhdfFMVi9Py8V8RSzX5UAMb4KW4C8IVRldVk6KYHjlVMm9EjJ4SbVruOHCWuFp5a0KFaBlypqmKGZI7-_a1OecfKi3KXYmfdWM1rv86r_86v_86t_8YPV6vwo2Ou-Oi4fAQHBzEJhsTRvApI35qCsLOMfL4geQ3Hmx</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>BÜTTNER, Michael</creator><creator>WALDER, Bernhard</creator><creator>VON ELM, Erik</creator><creator>TRAMER, Martin R</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials</title><author>BÜTTNER, Michael ; WALDER, Bernhard ; VON ELM, Erik ; TRAMER, Martin R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-a2bf85005f479a869d54fa29d762e745fe508db2a24cc4e09ec7f9e09c17cab33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Antiemetics</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Haloperidol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Haloperidol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Vomiting - etiology</topic><topic>Vomiting - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BÜTTNER, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDER, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON ELM, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRAMER, Martin R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BÜTTNER, Michael</au><au>WALDER, Bernhard</au><au>VON ELM, Erik</au><au>TRAMER, Martin R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1454</spage><epage>1463</epage><pages>1454-1463</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), and radiation therapy (24). The relative benefit to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting during 24 h with 0.5-4 mg haloperidol compared with placebo was 1.26-1.51 (number needed to treat, 3.2-5.1), without evidence of dose responsiveness; 0.25 mg was not antiemetic. With 1 mg haloperidol, the relative benefit to stop postoperative nausea or vomiting during 2-4 h compared with placebo was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00; number needed to treat, 6); with 2 mg, the relative benefit was 1.73 (1.11-2.68; number needed to treat, 4). In gastroenterology, 2 mg haloperidol was more effective than 1 mg. For chemotherapy and radiation therapy, no conclusions could be drawn. With 4 mg, one patient had extrapyramidal symptoms. With 5 mg, sedation was increased, with a relative risk of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.52; number needed to treat, 4.4). There were no reports on cardiac toxicity. Postoperatively and in gastroenterology, haloperidol is antiemetic, with minimal toxicity. For other clinical settings and for children, valid data are unavailable.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>15564955</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-200412000-00028</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3022 |
ispartof | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2004-12, Vol.101 (6), p.1454-1463 |
issn | 0003-3022 1528-1175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00000542_200412000_00028 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Antiemetics Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Gastrointestinal Diseases - complications Haloperidol - adverse effects Haloperidol - therapeutic use Humans Medical sciences Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control Radiotherapy - adverse effects Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Reproducibility of Results Risk Assessment Vomiting - etiology Vomiting - prevention & control |
title | Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic? A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T14%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20low-dose%20haloperidol%20a%20useful%20antiemetic?%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20published%20and%20unpublished%20randomized%20trials&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=B%C3%9CTTNER,%20Michael&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1454&rft.epage=1463&rft.pages=1454-1463&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-200412000-00028&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15564955%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-a2bf85005f479a869d54fa29d762e745fe508db2a24cc4e09ec7f9e09c17cab33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15564955&rfr_iscdi=true |