Loading…
Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia
Objective. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical care 2000-10, Vol.38 (10), p.1011-1021 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3 |
container_end_page | 1021 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1011 |
container_title | Medical care |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lenert, Leslie A. Ziegler, Jennifer Lee, Tina Sommi, Roger Mahmoud, Ramy |
description | Objective. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinical and policy decision making. Methods. Participants viewed videotaped depictions of simulated patients with mild and moderate symptoms of schizophrenia, with and without a common adverse drug effect (pseudoparkinsonism), and then provided standard gamble and visual analog scale ratings of desirability of these states. Subjects. A convenience sample of unrelated patients (n = 148), family members of patients (n = 91), and HCPs (nurses, psychologists, doctors of pharmacy, and doctors of medicine; n = 99) was drawn from geographically and clinically diverse environments. Results. Patients' and family members' utilities for health states averaged 0.1 to 0.15 units higher than those of HCPs (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_200010000_00005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3767984</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3767984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtOwzAUtBCIlsINEPIBCNhOHMdLVChFKmolPtvISV6ISz6VnVCV0-M2pazw5nlGMyN7HkKYkhtKpLgl7vCQE4-5C90ib0cdoSHlvvCoDKJjNCSEcU8QIQfozNqlkwqfs1M0oJQwGopgiIp7nedgoE7BYl3jKaiyLfC7KjtHqKqpP_BCtRrq1l7jiap0ucHPUCVgHFZ1hhem-dKZgzhvDJ53bdpUfdZLWujvZlW4dK3O0UmuSgsX-zlCb5OH1_HUm80fn8Z3My_1heBeLinLgDLJIKQKBCRcuVeDUlGYECllICnkIFOfMp5yqkTIWCDygCuRRI4eoajPTU1jrYE8XhldKbOJKYm35cW_5cWH8nrKWa9666pLKsj-jPu2nCDoBeumbN2PP8tuDSYudp3F_y3F2S5729K2jTnE-iIUMgr8H_WKgxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lenert, Leslie A. ; Ziegler, Jennifer ; Lee, Tina ; Sommi, Roger ; Mahmoud, Ramy</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenert, Leslie A. ; Ziegler, Jennifer ; Lee, Tina ; Sommi, Roger ; Mahmoud, Ramy</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinical and policy decision making. Methods. Participants viewed videotaped depictions of simulated patients with mild and moderate symptoms of schizophrenia, with and without a common adverse drug effect (pseudoparkinsonism), and then provided standard gamble and visual analog scale ratings of desirability of these states. Subjects. A convenience sample of unrelated patients (n = 148), family members of patients (n = 91), and HCPs (nurses, psychologists, doctors of pharmacy, and doctors of medicine; n = 99) was drawn from geographically and clinically diverse environments. Results. Patients' and family members' utilities for health states averaged 0.1 to 0.15 units higher than those of HCPs (P <0.002 for differences between groups, ANOVA for multiple observations). The disutility of adverse drug effects was less for health professionals than patients and family members (P = 0.008). Health professionals tended to prefer states with mild symptoms with extrapyramidal side effects to states with moderate symptoms. Patients and family members found these states equally preferable (P <0.007 for differences between groups). Conclusions. There are systematic differences in values for health outcomes between patients and HCPs with regard to states with adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs. Family members of patients in general had values that were more similar to those of patients than were those of health professionals. The results emphasize the importance of participation by patients (or family member proxies) in clinical decision making and guideline development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11021674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adverse effects ; Analysis of Variance ; Antipsychotic agents ; Antipsychotic Agents - adverse effects ; Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Consumer Behavior ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug effects ; Family ; Family members ; Female ; Gold standard ; Humans ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Mental health outcomes ; Odds Ratio ; Parkinson Disease, Secondary - etiology ; Patient Simulation ; Quality of Life ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - drug therapy ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Symptoms ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2000-10, Vol.38 (10), p.1011-1021</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3767984$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3767984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11021674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenert, Leslie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommi, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Ramy</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>Objective. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinical and policy decision making. Methods. Participants viewed videotaped depictions of simulated patients with mild and moderate symptoms of schizophrenia, with and without a common adverse drug effect (pseudoparkinsonism), and then provided standard gamble and visual analog scale ratings of desirability of these states. Subjects. A convenience sample of unrelated patients (n = 148), family members of patients (n = 91), and HCPs (nurses, psychologists, doctors of pharmacy, and doctors of medicine; n = 99) was drawn from geographically and clinically diverse environments. Results. Patients' and family members' utilities for health states averaged 0.1 to 0.15 units higher than those of HCPs (P <0.002 for differences between groups, ANOVA for multiple observations). The disutility of adverse drug effects was less for health professionals than patients and family members (P = 0.008). Health professionals tended to prefer states with mild symptoms with extrapyramidal side effects to states with moderate symptoms. Patients and family members found these states equally preferable (P <0.007 for differences between groups). Conclusions. There are systematic differences in values for health outcomes between patients and HCPs with regard to states with adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs. Family members of patients in general had values that were more similar to those of patients than were those of health professionals. The results emphasize the importance of participation by patients (or family member proxies) in clinical decision making and guideline development.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adverse effects</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Antipsychotic agents</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug effects</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family members</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gold standard</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental health outcomes</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease, Secondary - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Simulation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UUtOwzAUtBCIlsINEPIBCNhOHMdLVChFKmolPtvISV6ISz6VnVCV0-M2pazw5nlGMyN7HkKYkhtKpLgl7vCQE4-5C90ib0cdoSHlvvCoDKJjNCSEcU8QIQfozNqlkwqfs1M0oJQwGopgiIp7nedgoE7BYl3jKaiyLfC7KjtHqKqpP_BCtRrq1l7jiap0ucHPUCVgHFZ1hhem-dKZgzhvDJ53bdpUfdZLWujvZlW4dK3O0UmuSgsX-zlCb5OH1_HUm80fn8Z3My_1heBeLinLgDLJIKQKBCRcuVeDUlGYECllICnkIFOfMp5yqkTIWCDygCuRRI4eoajPTU1jrYE8XhldKbOJKYm35cW_5cWH8nrKWa9666pLKsj-jPu2nCDoBeumbN2PP8tuDSYudp3F_y3F2S5729K2jTnE-iIUMgr8H_WKgxQ</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Lenert, Leslie A.</creator><creator>Ziegler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Lee, Tina</creator><creator>Sommi, Roger</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Ramy</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia</title><author>Lenert, Leslie A. ; Ziegler, Jennifer ; Lee, Tina ; Sommi, Roger ; Mahmoud, Ramy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adverse effects</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Antipsychotic agents</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug effects</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family members</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gold standard</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental health outcomes</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease, Secondary - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Simulation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenert, Leslie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommi, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Ramy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenert, Leslie A.</au><au>Ziegler, Jennifer</au><au>Lee, Tina</au><au>Sommi, Roger</au><au>Mahmoud, Ramy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1011</spage><epage>1021</epage><pages>1011-1021</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>Objective. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinical and policy decision making. Methods. Participants viewed videotaped depictions of simulated patients with mild and moderate symptoms of schizophrenia, with and without a common adverse drug effect (pseudoparkinsonism), and then provided standard gamble and visual analog scale ratings of desirability of these states. Subjects. A convenience sample of unrelated patients (n = 148), family members of patients (n = 91), and HCPs (nurses, psychologists, doctors of pharmacy, and doctors of medicine; n = 99) was drawn from geographically and clinically diverse environments. Results. Patients' and family members' utilities for health states averaged 0.1 to 0.15 units higher than those of HCPs (P <0.002 for differences between groups, ANOVA for multiple observations). The disutility of adverse drug effects was less for health professionals than patients and family members (P = 0.008). Health professionals tended to prefer states with mild symptoms with extrapyramidal side effects to states with moderate symptoms. Patients and family members found these states equally preferable (P <0.007 for differences between groups). Conclusions. There are systematic differences in values for health outcomes between patients and HCPs with regard to states with adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs. Family members of patients in general had values that were more similar to those of patients than were those of health professionals. The results emphasize the importance of participation by patients (or family member proxies) in clinical decision making and guideline development.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><pmid>11021674</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7079 |
ispartof | Medical care, 2000-10, Vol.38 (10), p.1011-1021 |
issn | 0025-7079 1537-1948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00005650_200010000_00005 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Adult Adverse effects Analysis of Variance Antipsychotic agents Antipsychotic Agents - adverse effects Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Health Consumer Behavior Cross-Sectional Studies Drug effects Family Family members Female Gold standard Humans Male Medical personnel Mental health outcomes Odds Ratio Parkinson Disease, Secondary - etiology Patient Simulation Quality of Life Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - drug therapy Schizophrenic Psychology Symptoms Treatment Outcome United States |
title | Differences in Health Values among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Health%20Values%20among%20Patients,%20Family%20Members,%20and%20Providers%20for%20Outcomes%20in%20Schizophrenia&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Lenert,%20Leslie%20A.&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1011&rft.epage=1021&rft.pages=1011-1021&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3767984%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3775-f912de1292e61ae7eb5a173eaa86b0999491efe9c3125c51a762247f45a7b89c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11021674&rft_jstor_id=3767984&rfr_iscdi=true |