Loading…
The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis
Particles of a proprietary polyolefin rubber compound used in a lumbar disc prosthesis were generated in vitro and tested for biocompatibility in two animal models. OBJECTIVE To characterize any tissue response to polyolefin rubber particles. Intervertebral disc prostheses are emerging as alternativ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2002-10, Vol.27 (19), p.2088-2094 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3 |
container_end_page | 2094 |
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 2088 |
container_title | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | MOORE, Robert J FRASER, Robert D VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie FINNIE, John W BLUMBERGS, Peter C HAYNES, David R HUTCHENS, Martin J WALTERS, Rebecca M KAMAT, Anant S KOSZYCA, Barbara |
description | Particles of a proprietary polyolefin rubber compound used in a lumbar disc prosthesis were generated in vitro and tested for biocompatibility in two animal models. OBJECTIVE To characterize any tissue response to polyolefin rubber particles.
Intervertebral disc prostheses are emerging as alternatives to fusion techniques for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. The biocompatibility of all novel components used in the construction of these devices must be verified before they can be considered for general use.
Laboratory-generated polyolefin rubber particles were either injected into dorsal subcutaneous air pouches of 30 rats or placed directly onto the lumbosacral dura and nerve roots of 9 sheep. Histologic sections of tissues from, and remote from, the site of implantation were examined for evidence of inflammation and wound-healing responses.
Polyolefin rubber particle debris induced a tissue response that was consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large particles. The response was not significantly greater than that seen with similar size particles of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. There was no evidence of particle migration from the site of implantation, and there was no evidence of local or systemic toxic effects.
Polyolefin rubber particles induce only localized tissue response that is consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large nontoxic particles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007632-200210010-00003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00007632_200210010_00003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>12394919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BdmLx-jMfmX3phS_oOClnsN-xUaSJuymB_-9qa06l4GX552BhxCKcItgyjuYplScFQyAIQBCsY_4CZmjZLpAlOaUzIGrCRFczchFzp8ToTiaczJDxo0waObkfr2J1DV92380nqaYh36bIx17Otg0Nr6Nmdap76il7a5zNtHQZE-H1OdxE3OTL8lZbdscr457Qd6fHtfLl2L19vy6fFgVnpcwFiilC9pEKzQGpgIIZoRU0jsWVAg6Ysm5V5KBZ6IsdRBOy5pLcE7VGB1fEH2466fXOcW6GlLT2fRVIVR7KdWvlOpPyk_Ep-r1oTrsXBfDf_FoYQJujoDN3rZ1slvf5H-OG6WY0PwbeqJo6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>MOORE, Robert J ; FRASER, Robert D ; VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie ; FINNIE, John W ; BLUMBERGS, Peter C ; HAYNES, David R ; HUTCHENS, Martin J ; WALTERS, Rebecca M ; KAMAT, Anant S ; KOSZYCA, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Robert J ; FRASER, Robert D ; VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie ; FINNIE, John W ; BLUMBERGS, Peter C ; HAYNES, David R ; HUTCHENS, Martin J ; WALTERS, Rebecca M ; KAMAT, Anant S ; KOSZYCA, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Particles of a proprietary polyolefin rubber compound used in a lumbar disc prosthesis were generated in vitro and tested for biocompatibility in two animal models. OBJECTIVE To characterize any tissue response to polyolefin rubber particles.
Intervertebral disc prostheses are emerging as alternatives to fusion techniques for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. The biocompatibility of all novel components used in the construction of these devices must be verified before they can be considered for general use.
Laboratory-generated polyolefin rubber particles were either injected into dorsal subcutaneous air pouches of 30 rats or placed directly onto the lumbosacral dura and nerve roots of 9 sheep. Histologic sections of tissues from, and remote from, the site of implantation were examined for evidence of inflammation and wound-healing responses.
Polyolefin rubber particle debris induced a tissue response that was consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large particles. The response was not significantly greater than that seen with similar size particles of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. There was no evidence of particle migration from the site of implantation, and there was no evidence of local or systemic toxic effects.
Polyolefin rubber particles induce only localized tissue response that is consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large nontoxic particles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210010-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12394919</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures ; Drug Administration Routes ; Dura Mater - drug effects ; Dura Mater - pathology ; Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology ; Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology ; Implants, Experimental - adverse effects ; Implants, Experimental - statistics & numerical data ; Intervertebral Disc - surgery ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - etiology ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Laminectomy ; Lumbosacral Region ; Male ; Materials Testing - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Microspheres ; Models, Animal ; Particle Size ; Polyenes - chemistry ; Polyenes - pharmacology ; Polyethylenes - chemistry ; Polyethylenes - pharmacology ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred Strains ; Rubber - chemistry ; Rubber - pharmacology ; Sheep ; Skin - pathology ; Spinal Nerve Roots - drug effects ; Spinal Nerve Roots - pathology ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2002-10, Vol.27 (19), p.2088-2094</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13966248$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12394919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRASER, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FINNIE, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLUMBERGS, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAYNES, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTCHENS, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALTERS, Rebecca M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMAT, Anant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOSZYCA, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Particles of a proprietary polyolefin rubber compound used in a lumbar disc prosthesis were generated in vitro and tested for biocompatibility in two animal models. OBJECTIVE To characterize any tissue response to polyolefin rubber particles.
Intervertebral disc prostheses are emerging as alternatives to fusion techniques for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. The biocompatibility of all novel components used in the construction of these devices must be verified before they can be considered for general use.
Laboratory-generated polyolefin rubber particles were either injected into dorsal subcutaneous air pouches of 30 rats or placed directly onto the lumbosacral dura and nerve roots of 9 sheep. Histologic sections of tissues from, and remote from, the site of implantation were examined for evidence of inflammation and wound-healing responses.
Polyolefin rubber particle debris induced a tissue response that was consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large particles. The response was not significantly greater than that seen with similar size particles of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. There was no evidence of particle migration from the site of implantation, and there was no evidence of local or systemic toxic effects.
Polyolefin rubber particles induce only localized tissue response that is consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large nontoxic particles.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dermatologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Dura Mater - drug effects</subject><subject>Dura Mater - pathology</subject><subject>Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental - adverse effects</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - surgery</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - etiology</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Laminectomy</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Polyenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyenes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Rubber - chemistry</subject><subject>Rubber - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Nerve Roots - drug effects</subject><subject>Spinal Nerve Roots - pathology</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BdmLx-jMfmX3phS_oOClnsN-xUaSJuymB_-9qa06l4GX552BhxCKcItgyjuYplScFQyAIQBCsY_4CZmjZLpAlOaUzIGrCRFczchFzp8ToTiaczJDxo0waObkfr2J1DV92380nqaYh36bIx17Otg0Nr6Nmdap76il7a5zNtHQZE-H1OdxE3OTL8lZbdscr457Qd6fHtfLl2L19vy6fFgVnpcwFiilC9pEKzQGpgIIZoRU0jsWVAg6Ysm5V5KBZ6IsdRBOy5pLcE7VGB1fEH2466fXOcW6GlLT2fRVIVR7KdWvlOpPyk_Ep-r1oTrsXBfDf_FoYQJujoDN3rZ1slvf5H-OG6WY0PwbeqJo6g</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>MOORE, Robert J</creator><creator>FRASER, Robert D</creator><creator>VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie</creator><creator>FINNIE, John W</creator><creator>BLUMBERGS, Peter C</creator><creator>HAYNES, David R</creator><creator>HUTCHENS, Martin J</creator><creator>WALTERS, Rebecca M</creator><creator>KAMAT, Anant S</creator><creator>KOSZYCA, Barbara</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis</title><author>MOORE, Robert J ; FRASER, Robert D ; VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie ; FINNIE, John W ; BLUMBERGS, Peter C ; HAYNES, David R ; HUTCHENS, Martin J ; WALTERS, Rebecca M ; KAMAT, Anant S ; KOSZYCA, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dermatologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Dura Mater - drug effects</topic><topic>Dura Mater - pathology</topic><topic>Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental - adverse effects</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - surgery</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - etiology</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Laminectomy</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Polyenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyenes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Rubber - chemistry</topic><topic>Rubber - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Nerve Roots - drug effects</topic><topic>Spinal Nerve Roots - pathology</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRASER, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FINNIE, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLUMBERGS, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAYNES, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTCHENS, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALTERS, Rebecca M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMAT, Anant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOSZYCA, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOORE, Robert J</au><au>FRASER, Robert D</au><au>VERNON-ROBERTS, Barrie</au><au>FINNIE, John W</au><au>BLUMBERGS, Peter C</au><au>HAYNES, David R</au><au>HUTCHENS, Martin J</au><au>WALTERS, Rebecca M</au><au>KAMAT, Anant S</au><au>KOSZYCA, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>2088</spage><epage>2094</epage><pages>2088-2094</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Particles of a proprietary polyolefin rubber compound used in a lumbar disc prosthesis were generated in vitro and tested for biocompatibility in two animal models. OBJECTIVE To characterize any tissue response to polyolefin rubber particles.
Intervertebral disc prostheses are emerging as alternatives to fusion techniques for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. The biocompatibility of all novel components used in the construction of these devices must be verified before they can be considered for general use.
Laboratory-generated polyolefin rubber particles were either injected into dorsal subcutaneous air pouches of 30 rats or placed directly onto the lumbosacral dura and nerve roots of 9 sheep. Histologic sections of tissues from, and remote from, the site of implantation were examined for evidence of inflammation and wound-healing responses.
Polyolefin rubber particle debris induced a tissue response that was consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large particles. The response was not significantly greater than that seen with similar size particles of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. There was no evidence of particle migration from the site of implantation, and there was no evidence of local or systemic toxic effects.
Polyolefin rubber particles induce only localized tissue response that is consistent with a normal foreign body reaction to large nontoxic particles.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>12394919</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-200210010-00003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-2436 |
ispartof | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2002-10, Vol.27 (19), p.2088-2094 |
issn | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1097_00007632_200210010_00003 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Dermatologic Surgical Procedures Drug Administration Routes Dura Mater - drug effects Dura Mater - pathology Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data Equipment Failure Analysis Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology Implants, Experimental - adverse effects Implants, Experimental - statistics & numerical data Intervertebral Disc - surgery Intervertebral Disc Displacement - etiology Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Laminectomy Lumbosacral Region Male Materials Testing - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Microspheres Models, Animal Particle Size Polyenes - chemistry Polyenes - pharmacology Polyethylenes - chemistry Polyethylenes - pharmacology Rats Rats, Inbred Strains Rubber - chemistry Rubber - pharmacology Sheep Skin - pathology Spinal Nerve Roots - drug effects Spinal Nerve Roots - pathology Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments |
title | The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20biologic%20response%20to%20particles%20from%20a%20lumbar%20disc%20prosthesis&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=MOORE,%20Robert%20J&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=2088&rft.epage=2094&rft.pages=2088-2094&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-200210010-00003&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E12394919%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-155bd89ea481d26d04294565cb2d6dd8e1733c6520c24778d4b85f350bb6f1eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12394919&rfr_iscdi=true |