The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 1979-09, Vol.205 (1161), p.581-598
• Main Authors: Gould, S. J., Lewontin, R. C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation, Biological; Alleles; Allometry; Animals; Architecture; Biological adaptation; Biological Evolution; Evolution; Evolutionism; Female animals; Male animals; Natural selection; Population genetics; Selection, Genetic
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 0080-4649; 0950-1193; 1471-2954; 2053-9193
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086

An adaptationist programme has dominated evolutionary thought in England and the United States during the past 40 years. It is based on faith in the power of natural selection as an optimizing agent. It proceeds by breaking an organism into unitary 'traits' and proposing an adaptive story for each considered separately. Trade-offs among competing selective demands exert the only brake upon perfection; non-optimality is thereby rendered as a result of adaptation as well. We criticize this approach and attempt to reassert a competing notion (long popular in continental Europe) that organisms must be analysed as integrated wholes, with Bauplane so constrained by phyletic heritage, pathways of development and general architecture that the constraints themselves become more interesting and more important in delimiting pathways of change than the selective force that may mediate change when it occurs. We fault the adaptationist programme for its failure to distinguish current utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this will not explain why they got so small); for its unwillingness to consider alternatives to adaptive stories; for its reliance upon plausibility alone as a criterion for accepting speculative tales; and for its failure to consider adequately such competing themes as random fixation of alleles, production of non-adaptive structures by developmental correlation with selected features (allometry, pleiotropy, material compensation, mechanically forced correlation), the separability of adaptation and selection, multiple adaptive peaks, and current utility as an epiphenomenon of non-adaptive structures. We support Darwin's own pluralistic approach to identifying the agents of evolutionary change.