Loading…
Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans
Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain'...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033 |
container_end_page | 1923 |
container_issue | 1503 |
container_start_page | 1919 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 269 |
creator | Nettle, Daniel |
description | Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2002_2111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEokNhywohr2BDBj9je4OAivJQBYjnBslKHKfxNImDnQwdfj3OZDQwQpSVZd3vXp_jc5PkLoJLBKV47ENfLDGEeIkRQteSBaIcpVgyej1ZQJnhVFCGj5JbIawghJIJdjM5QpgwiBldJN--utZ0DwOojT2vh0fAm967ctSDXRsQRq1NCCDvSjDUBpi1a8bBug64CgRzOeYNKG3rfF_b0ALbgdaVxnegHtu8C7eTG1XeBHNndx4nn09ffDp5lZ69e_n65NlZqrmkQ8pxwUqTGVhoJgvGWMaFICYrWKUhlTQXAgoOsYaF5GVFoNC8wFRTzhDJICHHyZN5bj8WrSm16QafN6r3ts39RrncqsNKZ2t17tYKZTL-Go0DHuwGePd9NGFQrQ3aNE3eGTcGxTEiGEP8XxAJBhkXPILLGdTeheBNtVeDoJqSU1NyakpOTcnFhvt_eviN76KKQJgB7zbxM522ZtiolRt9F6_qw8f3z5GUcI0zaRGDREFBEOSUUax-2n773gSoCCgbwmjUFjvU8bcsctWr_zRzb-5ahcH5vRcCp2QnK-lctmEwl_ty7i9Uxgln6ougSkb5hJ2-VW8ij2e-jjv6w3qjDtTES-9DsTW2tYQkkrHp6ZVNk2LtuiGuxGGnqsYmLk9ctF8vrwzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18505787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12350254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological Evolution ; Body Height ; Childlessness ; Children ; Choice Behavior ; Female ; Fertility ; Height ; Human Evolution ; Humans ; Male ; Marriage ; Mate Choice ; Mating behavior ; Men ; Menstruation ; Reproduction ; Reproductive success ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual Dimorphism ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social evolution ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067884$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Childlessness</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Human Evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Mate Choice</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual Dimorphism</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social evolution</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEokNhywohr2BDBj9je4OAivJQBYjnBslKHKfxNImDnQwdfj3OZDQwQpSVZd3vXp_jc5PkLoJLBKV47ENfLDGEeIkRQteSBaIcpVgyej1ZQJnhVFCGj5JbIawghJIJdjM5QpgwiBldJN--utZ0DwOojT2vh0fAm967ctSDXRsQRq1NCCDvSjDUBpi1a8bBug64CgRzOeYNKG3rfF_b0ALbgdaVxnegHtu8C7eTG1XeBHNndx4nn09ffDp5lZ69e_n65NlZqrmkQ8pxwUqTGVhoJgvGWMaFICYrWKUhlTQXAgoOsYaF5GVFoNC8wFRTzhDJICHHyZN5bj8WrSm16QafN6r3ts39RrncqsNKZ2t17tYKZTL-Go0DHuwGePd9NGFQrQ3aNE3eGTcGxTEiGEP8XxAJBhkXPILLGdTeheBNtVeDoJqSU1NyakpOTcnFhvt_eviN76KKQJgB7zbxM522ZtiolRt9F6_qw8f3z5GUcI0zaRGDREFBEOSUUax-2n773gSoCCgbwmjUFjvU8bcsctWr_zRzb-5ahcH5vRcCp2QnK-lctmEwl_ty7i9Uxgln6ougSkb5hJ2-VW8ij2e-jjv6w3qjDtTES-9DsTW2tYQkkrHp6ZVNk2LtuiGuxGGnqsYmLk9ctF8vrwzc</recordid><startdate>20020922</startdate><enddate>20020922</enddate><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020922</creationdate><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><author>Nettle, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Childlessness</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Human Evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Mate Choice</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual Dimorphism</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social evolution</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nettle, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2002-09-22</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>269</volume><issue>1503</issue><spage>1919</spage><epage>1923</epage><pages>1919-1923</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12350254</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2002.2111</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2002_2111 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Adolescent Biological Evolution Body Height Childlessness Children Choice Behavior Female Fertility Height Human Evolution Humans Male Marriage Mate Choice Mating behavior Men Menstruation Reproduction Reproductive success Sex Characteristics Sexual Dimorphism Social Class Social classes Social evolution Womens health |
title | Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women's%20height,%20reproductive%20success%20and%20the%20evolution%20of%20sexual%20dimorphism%20in%20modern%20humans&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Nettle,%20Daniel&rft.date=2002-09-22&rft.volume=269&rft.issue=1503&rft.spage=1919&rft.epage=1923&rft.pages=1919-1923&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3067884%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18505787&rft_id=info:pmid/12350254&rft_jstor_id=3067884&rfr_iscdi=true |