Loading…

Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans

Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923
Main Author: Nettle, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033
container_end_page 1923
container_issue 1503
container_start_page 1919
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 269
creator Nettle, Daniel
description Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2002_2111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEokNhywohr2BDBj9je4OAivJQBYjnBslKHKfxNImDnQwdfj3OZDQwQpSVZd3vXp_jc5PkLoJLBKV47ENfLDGEeIkRQteSBaIcpVgyej1ZQJnhVFCGj5JbIawghJIJdjM5QpgwiBldJN--utZ0DwOojT2vh0fAm967ctSDXRsQRq1NCCDvSjDUBpi1a8bBug64CgRzOeYNKG3rfF_b0ALbgdaVxnegHtu8C7eTG1XeBHNndx4nn09ffDp5lZ69e_n65NlZqrmkQ8pxwUqTGVhoJgvGWMaFICYrWKUhlTQXAgoOsYaF5GVFoNC8wFRTzhDJICHHyZN5bj8WrSm16QafN6r3ts39RrncqsNKZ2t17tYKZTL-Go0DHuwGePd9NGFQrQ3aNE3eGTcGxTEiGEP8XxAJBhkXPILLGdTeheBNtVeDoJqSU1NyakpOTcnFhvt_eviN76KKQJgB7zbxM522ZtiolRt9F6_qw8f3z5GUcI0zaRGDREFBEOSUUax-2n773gSoCCgbwmjUFjvU8bcsctWr_zRzb-5ahcH5vRcCp2QnK-lctmEwl_ty7i9Uxgln6ougSkb5hJ2-VW8ij2e-jjv6w3qjDtTES-9DsTW2tYQkkrHp6ZVNk2LtuiGuxGGnqsYmLk9ctF8vrwzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18505787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12350254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological Evolution ; Body Height ; Childlessness ; Children ; Choice Behavior ; Female ; Fertility ; Height ; Human Evolution ; Humans ; Male ; Marriage ; Mate Choice ; Mating behavior ; Men ; Menstruation ; Reproduction ; Reproductive success ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual Dimorphism ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social evolution ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067884$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Childlessness</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Human Evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Mate Choice</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual Dimorphism</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social evolution</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEokNhywohr2BDBj9je4OAivJQBYjnBslKHKfxNImDnQwdfj3OZDQwQpSVZd3vXp_jc5PkLoJLBKV47ENfLDGEeIkRQteSBaIcpVgyej1ZQJnhVFCGj5JbIawghJIJdjM5QpgwiBldJN--utZ0DwOojT2vh0fAm967ctSDXRsQRq1NCCDvSjDUBpi1a8bBug64CgRzOeYNKG3rfF_b0ALbgdaVxnegHtu8C7eTG1XeBHNndx4nn09ffDp5lZ69e_n65NlZqrmkQ8pxwUqTGVhoJgvGWMaFICYrWKUhlTQXAgoOsYaF5GVFoNC8wFRTzhDJICHHyZN5bj8WrSm16QafN6r3ts39RrncqsNKZ2t17tYKZTL-Go0DHuwGePd9NGFQrQ3aNE3eGTcGxTEiGEP8XxAJBhkXPILLGdTeheBNtVeDoJqSU1NyakpOTcnFhvt_eviN76KKQJgB7zbxM522ZtiolRt9F6_qw8f3z5GUcI0zaRGDREFBEOSUUax-2n773gSoCCgbwmjUFjvU8bcsctWr_zRzb-5ahcH5vRcCp2QnK-lctmEwl_ty7i9Uxgln6ougSkb5hJ2-VW8ij2e-jjv6w3qjDtTES-9DsTW2tYQkkrHp6ZVNk2LtuiGuxGGnqsYmLk9ctF8vrwzc</recordid><startdate>20020922</startdate><enddate>20020922</enddate><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020922</creationdate><title>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</title><author>Nettle, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Childlessness</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Human Evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Mate Choice</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual Dimorphism</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social evolution</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nettle, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2002-09-22</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>269</volume><issue>1503</issue><spage>1919</spage><epage>1923</epage><pages>1919-1923</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12350254</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2002.2111</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-09, Vol.269 (1503), p.1919-1923
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2002_2111
source Open Access: PubMed Central; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Biological Evolution
Body Height
Childlessness
Children
Choice Behavior
Female
Fertility
Height
Human Evolution
Humans
Male
Marriage
Mate Choice
Mating behavior
Men
Menstruation
Reproduction
Reproductive success
Sex Characteristics
Sexual Dimorphism
Social Class
Social classes
Social evolution
Womens health
title Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women's%20height,%20reproductive%20success%20and%20the%20evolution%20of%20sexual%20dimorphism%20in%20modern%20humans&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Nettle,%20Daniel&rft.date=2002-09-22&rft.volume=269&rft.issue=1503&rft.spage=1919&rft.epage=1923&rft.pages=1919-1923&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3067884%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-72b5de6e0bc59b55567883e6b5fc0494a8808702c0b97df308c7b24c475136033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18505787&rft_id=info:pmid/12350254&rft_jstor_id=3067884&rfr_iscdi=true