Loading…

Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)

Chloroplasts originated just once, from cyanobacteria enslaved by a biciliate protozoan to form the plant kingdom (green plants, red and glaucophyte algae), but subsequently, were laterally transferred to other lineages to form eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras or meta-algae. This process of secondary s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2003-01, Vol.358 (1429), p.109-134
Main Author: T. Cavalier-Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713
container_end_page 134
container_issue 1429
container_start_page 109
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 358
creator T. Cavalier-Smith
description Chloroplasts originated just once, from cyanobacteria enslaved by a biciliate protozoan to form the plant kingdom (green plants, red and glaucophyte algae), but subsequently, were laterally transferred to other lineages to form eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras or meta-algae. This process of secondary symbiogenesis (permanent merger of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryote cells) has left remarkable traces of its evolutionary role in the more complex topology of the membranes surrounding all non-plant (meta-algal) chloroplasts. It took place twice, soon after green and red algae diverged over 550 Myr ago to form two independent major branches of the eukaryotic tree (chromalveolates and cabozoa), comprising both meta-algae and numerous secondarily non-photosynthetic lineages. In both cases, enslavement probably began by evolving a novel targeting of endomembrane vesicles to the perialgal vacuole to implant host porter proteins for extracting photosynthate. Chromalveolates arose by such enslavement of a unicellular red alga and evolution of chlorophyll c to form the kingdom Chromista and protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata, which diverged from the ancestral chromalveolate chimaera. Cabozoa arose when the common ancestor of euglenoids and cercozoan chlorarachnean algae enslaved a tetraphyte green alga with chlorophyll a and b. I suggest that in cabozoa the endomembrane vesicles originally budded from the Golgi, whereas in chromalveolates they budded from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) independently of Golgi-targeted vesicles, presenting a potentially novel target for drugs against alveolate Sporozoa such as malaria parasites and Toxoplasma. These hypothetical ER-derived vesicles mediated fusion of the perialgal vacuole and rough ER (RER) in the ancestral chromist, placing the former red alga within the RER lumen. Subsequently, this chimaera diverged to form cryptomonads, which retained the red algal nucleus as a nucleomorph (NM) with approximately 464 protein-coding genes (30 encoding plastid proteins) and a red or blue phycobiliprotein antenna pigment, and the chromobiotes (heterokonts and haptophytes), which lost phycobilins and evolved the brown carotenoid fucoxanthin that colours brown seaweeds, diatoms and haptophytes. Chromobiotes transferred the 30 genes to the nucleus and lost the NM genome and nuclear-pore complexes, but retained its membrane as the periplastid reticulum (PPR), putatively the phospholipid factory of the periplastid space (former algal cyt
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2002.1194
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2002_1194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558107</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQhSMEYsvClRNCOSE4pNiOE9uXRWjFLogKhFTYo-U6kzTdxC62s5B_wM_GbaqyewBOtvW-eTOelyRPMZpjJPhr58NqThAic4wFvZfMMGU4I4Kh-8kMiZJknOblSfLI-w1CSBSMPkxOMCkEFQTPkl-XYGzf6tRBNejQWpMqU6VwY7th_7J1auwNdGkDBkIEe-hXThnwe3DrbIDWZEG5JsqmSXul160BN6atSWG4Vm6MSHa8pVHuFTjl05c9BJWprlHw6nHyoFadhyeH8zT5evFuef4-W3y-_HD-dpHpErOQcV3zXIBmqOIClOalEIUqcA1YUwI1qoAhQhjwqta8yBmr2IqhWIRLyhnOT5OzyXc7rHqoNJjgVCe3Lg7lRmlVK-8qpl3Lxt5IXIocIxoNXhwMnP0-gA-yb72Gros7sYOXLEc5JlT8F8SCCBpDi-B8ArWz3juoj9NgJHcpy13KcpeyxFPB89t_-IMfYo1APgHOjnGZVrcQRrmxgzPx-XfbZ1PVxgfrjq55UXCMWJSzSW59gJ9HWblrWbKcFfIbp_Ji-fHqy9WnpVxE_s3Er9tm_aN1IO9Ms2-urQlxz7EHl5gSsZtL1kMXA6nq6ID-6WDHbfS4XZv_Bp8T-kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19294194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>T. Cavalier-Smith</creator><contributor>Raven, J. A. ; Allen, J. F. ; Allen, J. F. ; Raven, J. A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>T. Cavalier-Smith ; Raven, J. A. ; Allen, J. F. ; Allen, J. F. ; Raven, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Chloroplasts originated just once, from cyanobacteria enslaved by a biciliate protozoan to form the plant kingdom (green plants, red and glaucophyte algae), but subsequently, were laterally transferred to other lineages to form eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras or meta-algae. This process of secondary symbiogenesis (permanent merger of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryote cells) has left remarkable traces of its evolutionary role in the more complex topology of the membranes surrounding all non-plant (meta-algal) chloroplasts. It took place twice, soon after green and red algae diverged over 550 Myr ago to form two independent major branches of the eukaryotic tree (chromalveolates and cabozoa), comprising both meta-algae and numerous secondarily non-photosynthetic lineages. In both cases, enslavement probably began by evolving a novel targeting of endomembrane vesicles to the perialgal vacuole to implant host porter proteins for extracting photosynthate. Chromalveolates arose by such enslavement of a unicellular red alga and evolution of chlorophyll c to form the kingdom Chromista and protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata, which diverged from the ancestral chromalveolate chimaera. Cabozoa arose when the common ancestor of euglenoids and cercozoan chlorarachnean algae enslaved a tetraphyte green alga with chlorophyll a and b. I suggest that in cabozoa the endomembrane vesicles originally budded from the Golgi, whereas in chromalveolates they budded from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) independently of Golgi-targeted vesicles, presenting a potentially novel target for drugs against alveolate Sporozoa such as malaria parasites and Toxoplasma. These hypothetical ER-derived vesicles mediated fusion of the perialgal vacuole and rough ER (RER) in the ancestral chromist, placing the former red alga within the RER lumen. Subsequently, this chimaera diverged to form cryptomonads, which retained the red algal nucleus as a nucleomorph (NM) with approximately 464 protein-coding genes (30 encoding plastid proteins) and a red or blue phycobiliprotein antenna pigment, and the chromobiotes (heterokonts and haptophytes), which lost phycobilins and evolved the brown carotenoid fucoxanthin that colours brown seaweeds, diatoms and haptophytes. Chromobiotes transferred the 30 genes to the nucleus and lost the NM genome and nuclear-pore complexes, but retained its membrane as the periplastid reticulum (PPR), putatively the phospholipid factory of the periplastid space (former algal cytoplasm), as did the ancestral alveolate independently. The chlorarachnean NM has three minute chromosomes bearing approximately 300 genes riddled with pygmy introns. I propose that the periplastid membrane (PPM, the former algal plasma membrane) of chromalveolates, and possibly chlorarachneans, grows by fusion of vesicles emanating from the NM envelope or PPR. Dinoflagellates and euglenoids independently lost the PPM and PPR (after diverging from Sporozoa and chlorarachneans, respectively) and evolved triple chloroplast envelopes comprising the original plant double envelope and an extra outermost membrane, the EM, derived from the perialgal vacuole. In all metaalgae most chloroplast proteins are coded by nuclear genes and enter the chloroplast by using bipartite targeting sequences - an upstream signal sequence for entering the ER and a downstream chloroplast transit sequence. I present a new theory for the four-fold diversification of the chloroplast OM protein translocon following its insertion into the PPM to facilitate protein translocation across it (of both periplastid and plastid proteins). I discuss evidence from genome sequencing and other sources on the contrasting modes of protein targeting, cellular integration, and evolution of these two major lineages of eukaryote 'cells within cells'. They also provide powerful evidence for natural selection's effectiveness in eliminating most functionless DNA and therefore of a universally useful non-genic function for nuclear non-coding DNA, i.e. most DNA in the biosphere, and dramatic examples of genomic reduction. I briefly argue that chloroplast replacement in dinoflagellates, which happened at least twice, may have been evolutionarily easier than secondary symbiogenesis because parts of the chromalveolate protein-targeting machinery could have helped enslave the foreign plastids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12594921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Algae ; Alveolata ; Alveolates ; Bacillariophyceae ; Cell membranes ; Chimera - genetics ; Chimera - metabolism ; Chlorarachneans ; Chloroplast Evolution ; Chloroplasts ; Chloroplasts - metabolism ; Chromalveolates ; Chromista ; Cryptophyta ; Cyanobacteria ; Cyanophyta ; DNA ; Euglenoids ; Eukaryota - cytology ; Eukaryota - genetics ; Eukaryota - metabolism ; Eukaryotic Cells - cytology ; Eukaryotic Cells - metabolism ; Evolution ; Evolution Of Genome Size ; Evolution, Molecular ; Genome ; Genomes ; Intracellular Membranes - metabolism ; Models, Biological ; Nucleomorph ; P branes ; Phospholipids - metabolism ; Plastids ; Protein Transport ; Proteins ; Proteins - metabolism ; Sporozoa ; Symbiosis ; Toxoplasma</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-01, Vol.358 (1429), p.109-134</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12594921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Raven, J. A.</contributor><contributor>Allen, J. F.</contributor><contributor>Allen, J. F.</contributor><contributor>Raven, J. A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>T. Cavalier-Smith</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Chloroplasts originated just once, from cyanobacteria enslaved by a biciliate protozoan to form the plant kingdom (green plants, red and glaucophyte algae), but subsequently, were laterally transferred to other lineages to form eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras or meta-algae. This process of secondary symbiogenesis (permanent merger of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryote cells) has left remarkable traces of its evolutionary role in the more complex topology of the membranes surrounding all non-plant (meta-algal) chloroplasts. It took place twice, soon after green and red algae diverged over 550 Myr ago to form two independent major branches of the eukaryotic tree (chromalveolates and cabozoa), comprising both meta-algae and numerous secondarily non-photosynthetic lineages. In both cases, enslavement probably began by evolving a novel targeting of endomembrane vesicles to the perialgal vacuole to implant host porter proteins for extracting photosynthate. Chromalveolates arose by such enslavement of a unicellular red alga and evolution of chlorophyll c to form the kingdom Chromista and protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata, which diverged from the ancestral chromalveolate chimaera. Cabozoa arose when the common ancestor of euglenoids and cercozoan chlorarachnean algae enslaved a tetraphyte green alga with chlorophyll a and b. I suggest that in cabozoa the endomembrane vesicles originally budded from the Golgi, whereas in chromalveolates they budded from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) independently of Golgi-targeted vesicles, presenting a potentially novel target for drugs against alveolate Sporozoa such as malaria parasites and Toxoplasma. These hypothetical ER-derived vesicles mediated fusion of the perialgal vacuole and rough ER (RER) in the ancestral chromist, placing the former red alga within the RER lumen. Subsequently, this chimaera diverged to form cryptomonads, which retained the red algal nucleus as a nucleomorph (NM) with approximately 464 protein-coding genes (30 encoding plastid proteins) and a red or blue phycobiliprotein antenna pigment, and the chromobiotes (heterokonts and haptophytes), which lost phycobilins and evolved the brown carotenoid fucoxanthin that colours brown seaweeds, diatoms and haptophytes. Chromobiotes transferred the 30 genes to the nucleus and lost the NM genome and nuclear-pore complexes, but retained its membrane as the periplastid reticulum (PPR), putatively the phospholipid factory of the periplastid space (former algal cytoplasm), as did the ancestral alveolate independently. The chlorarachnean NM has three minute chromosomes bearing approximately 300 genes riddled with pygmy introns. I propose that the periplastid membrane (PPM, the former algal plasma membrane) of chromalveolates, and possibly chlorarachneans, grows by fusion of vesicles emanating from the NM envelope or PPR. Dinoflagellates and euglenoids independently lost the PPM and PPR (after diverging from Sporozoa and chlorarachneans, respectively) and evolved triple chloroplast envelopes comprising the original plant double envelope and an extra outermost membrane, the EM, derived from the perialgal vacuole. In all metaalgae most chloroplast proteins are coded by nuclear genes and enter the chloroplast by using bipartite targeting sequences - an upstream signal sequence for entering the ER and a downstream chloroplast transit sequence. I present a new theory for the four-fold diversification of the chloroplast OM protein translocon following its insertion into the PPM to facilitate protein translocation across it (of both periplastid and plastid proteins). I discuss evidence from genome sequencing and other sources on the contrasting modes of protein targeting, cellular integration, and evolution of these two major lineages of eukaryote 'cells within cells'. They also provide powerful evidence for natural selection's effectiveness in eliminating most functionless DNA and therefore of a universally useful non-genic function for nuclear non-coding DNA, i.e. most DNA in the biosphere, and dramatic examples of genomic reduction. I briefly argue that chloroplast replacement in dinoflagellates, which happened at least twice, may have been evolutionarily easier than secondary symbiogenesis because parts of the chromalveolate protein-targeting machinery could have helped enslave the foreign plastids.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Alveolata</subject><subject>Alveolates</subject><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Cell membranes</subject><subject>Chimera - genetics</subject><subject>Chimera - metabolism</subject><subject>Chlorarachneans</subject><subject>Chloroplast Evolution</subject><subject>Chloroplasts</subject><subject>Chloroplasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Chromalveolates</subject><subject>Chromista</subject><subject>Cryptophyta</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Cyanophyta</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Euglenoids</subject><subject>Eukaryota - cytology</subject><subject>Eukaryota - genetics</subject><subject>Eukaryota - metabolism</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution Of Genome Size</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Intracellular Membranes - metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nucleomorph</subject><subject>P branes</subject><subject>Phospholipids - metabolism</subject><subject>Plastids</subject><subject>Protein Transport</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Sporozoa</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Toxoplasma</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQhSMEYsvClRNCOSE4pNiOE9uXRWjFLogKhFTYo-U6kzTdxC62s5B_wM_GbaqyewBOtvW-eTOelyRPMZpjJPhr58NqThAic4wFvZfMMGU4I4Kh-8kMiZJknOblSfLI-w1CSBSMPkxOMCkEFQTPkl-XYGzf6tRBNejQWpMqU6VwY7th_7J1auwNdGkDBkIEe-hXThnwe3DrbIDWZEG5JsqmSXul160BN6atSWG4Vm6MSHa8pVHuFTjl05c9BJWprlHw6nHyoFadhyeH8zT5evFuef4-W3y-_HD-dpHpErOQcV3zXIBmqOIClOalEIUqcA1YUwI1qoAhQhjwqta8yBmr2IqhWIRLyhnOT5OzyXc7rHqoNJjgVCe3Lg7lRmlVK-8qpl3Lxt5IXIocIxoNXhwMnP0-gA-yb72Gros7sYOXLEc5JlT8F8SCCBpDi-B8ArWz3juoj9NgJHcpy13KcpeyxFPB89t_-IMfYo1APgHOjnGZVrcQRrmxgzPx-XfbZ1PVxgfrjq55UXCMWJSzSW59gJ9HWblrWbKcFfIbp_Ji-fHqy9WnpVxE_s3Er9tm_aN1IO9Ms2-urQlxz7EHl5gSsZtL1kMXA6nq6ID-6WDHbfS4XZv_Bp8T-kA</recordid><startdate>20030129</startdate><enddate>20030129</enddate><creator>T. Cavalier-Smith</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030129</creationdate><title>Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)</title><author>T. Cavalier-Smith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Alveolata</topic><topic>Alveolates</topic><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Cell membranes</topic><topic>Chimera - genetics</topic><topic>Chimera - metabolism</topic><topic>Chlorarachneans</topic><topic>Chloroplast Evolution</topic><topic>Chloroplasts</topic><topic>Chloroplasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Chromalveolates</topic><topic>Chromista</topic><topic>Cryptophyta</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Cyanophyta</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Euglenoids</topic><topic>Eukaryota - cytology</topic><topic>Eukaryota - genetics</topic><topic>Eukaryota - metabolism</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution Of Genome Size</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Intracellular Membranes - metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nucleomorph</topic><topic>P branes</topic><topic>Phospholipids - metabolism</topic><topic>Plastids</topic><topic>Protein Transport</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Sporozoa</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Toxoplasma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>T. Cavalier-Smith</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>T. Cavalier-Smith</au><au>Raven, J. A.</au><au>Allen, J. F.</au><au>Allen, J. F.</au><au>Raven, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2003-01-29</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>1429</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>109-134</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Chloroplasts originated just once, from cyanobacteria enslaved by a biciliate protozoan to form the plant kingdom (green plants, red and glaucophyte algae), but subsequently, were laterally transferred to other lineages to form eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras or meta-algae. This process of secondary symbiogenesis (permanent merger of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryote cells) has left remarkable traces of its evolutionary role in the more complex topology of the membranes surrounding all non-plant (meta-algal) chloroplasts. It took place twice, soon after green and red algae diverged over 550 Myr ago to form two independent major branches of the eukaryotic tree (chromalveolates and cabozoa), comprising both meta-algae and numerous secondarily non-photosynthetic lineages. In both cases, enslavement probably began by evolving a novel targeting of endomembrane vesicles to the perialgal vacuole to implant host porter proteins for extracting photosynthate. Chromalveolates arose by such enslavement of a unicellular red alga and evolution of chlorophyll c to form the kingdom Chromista and protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata, which diverged from the ancestral chromalveolate chimaera. Cabozoa arose when the common ancestor of euglenoids and cercozoan chlorarachnean algae enslaved a tetraphyte green alga with chlorophyll a and b. I suggest that in cabozoa the endomembrane vesicles originally budded from the Golgi, whereas in chromalveolates they budded from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) independently of Golgi-targeted vesicles, presenting a potentially novel target for drugs against alveolate Sporozoa such as malaria parasites and Toxoplasma. These hypothetical ER-derived vesicles mediated fusion of the perialgal vacuole and rough ER (RER) in the ancestral chromist, placing the former red alga within the RER lumen. Subsequently, this chimaera diverged to form cryptomonads, which retained the red algal nucleus as a nucleomorph (NM) with approximately 464 protein-coding genes (30 encoding plastid proteins) and a red or blue phycobiliprotein antenna pigment, and the chromobiotes (heterokonts and haptophytes), which lost phycobilins and evolved the brown carotenoid fucoxanthin that colours brown seaweeds, diatoms and haptophytes. Chromobiotes transferred the 30 genes to the nucleus and lost the NM genome and nuclear-pore complexes, but retained its membrane as the periplastid reticulum (PPR), putatively the phospholipid factory of the periplastid space (former algal cytoplasm), as did the ancestral alveolate independently. The chlorarachnean NM has three minute chromosomes bearing approximately 300 genes riddled with pygmy introns. I propose that the periplastid membrane (PPM, the former algal plasma membrane) of chromalveolates, and possibly chlorarachneans, grows by fusion of vesicles emanating from the NM envelope or PPR. Dinoflagellates and euglenoids independently lost the PPM and PPR (after diverging from Sporozoa and chlorarachneans, respectively) and evolved triple chloroplast envelopes comprising the original plant double envelope and an extra outermost membrane, the EM, derived from the perialgal vacuole. In all metaalgae most chloroplast proteins are coded by nuclear genes and enter the chloroplast by using bipartite targeting sequences - an upstream signal sequence for entering the ER and a downstream chloroplast transit sequence. I present a new theory for the four-fold diversification of the chloroplast OM protein translocon following its insertion into the PPM to facilitate protein translocation across it (of both periplastid and plastid proteins). I discuss evidence from genome sequencing and other sources on the contrasting modes of protein targeting, cellular integration, and evolution of these two major lineages of eukaryote 'cells within cells'. They also provide powerful evidence for natural selection's effectiveness in eliminating most functionless DNA and therefore of a universally useful non-genic function for nuclear non-coding DNA, i.e. most DNA in the biosphere, and dramatic examples of genomic reduction. I briefly argue that chloroplast replacement in dinoflagellates, which happened at least twice, may have been evolutionarily easier than secondary symbiogenesis because parts of the chromalveolate protein-targeting machinery could have helped enslave the foreign plastids.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12594921</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2002.1194</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-01, Vol.358 (1429), p.109-134
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2002_1194
source Open Access: PubMed Central; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Algae
Alveolata
Alveolates
Bacillariophyceae
Cell membranes
Chimera - genetics
Chimera - metabolism
Chlorarachneans
Chloroplast Evolution
Chloroplasts
Chloroplasts - metabolism
Chromalveolates
Chromista
Cryptophyta
Cyanobacteria
Cyanophyta
DNA
Euglenoids
Eukaryota - cytology
Eukaryota - genetics
Eukaryota - metabolism
Eukaryotic Cells - cytology
Eukaryotic Cells - metabolism
Evolution
Evolution Of Genome Size
Evolution, Molecular
Genome
Genomes
Intracellular Membranes - metabolism
Models, Biological
Nucleomorph
P branes
Phospholipids - metabolism
Plastids
Protein Transport
Proteins
Proteins - metabolism
Sporozoa
Symbiosis
Toxoplasma
title Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20reduction%20and%20evolution%20of%20novel%20genetic%20membranes%20and%20protein-targeting%20machinery%20in%20eukaryote-eukaryote%20chimaeras%20(meta-algae)&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=T.%20Cavalier-Smith&rft.date=2003-01-29&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=1429&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=109-134&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2002.1194&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3558107%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-8cf839ec70d89eac86995a51fe1c42ef0de70227e8dfc85377d7b70f831648713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19294194&rft_id=info:pmid/12594921&rft_jstor_id=3558107&rfr_iscdi=true