Loading…

Half-Crystal Energy and Enthalpy of Sublimation of Diuron: 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea

The enthalpy of sublimation of diuron, 3‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea, C9H10ON2Cl2, was measured at 393 K using a Tian–Calvet calorimeter. The corrected experimental value ΔsubHmο (298K) = 133.87 (74) kJ mol−1 was then compared to the half‐crystal energy Ek. This energy was calculated from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied crystallography 1997-10, Vol.30 (5-1), p.527-531
Main Authors: Pfefer, G., Sabbah, R., Boistelle, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The enthalpy of sublimation of diuron, 3‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea, C9H10ON2Cl2, was measured at 393 K using a Tian–Calvet calorimeter. The corrected experimental value ΔsubHmο (298K) = 133.87 (74) kJ mol−1 was then compared to the half‐crystal energy Ek. This energy was calculated from structural data using the `consistent valence force field', which consists of a 6–12 Lennard–Jones potential and a Coulomb term. The disagreement between ΔsubHmο (298K) and Ek = 152.6 kJmol−1 is about 14%. It can be partially attributed to the inaccuracy of the atomic coordinates of the crystal structure and to the charges of the force field. For simple molecules such as normal octadecane (n‐C18H38), hexanedioic acid (C6H10O4), diphenylmethanone (C13H10O) and anthracene (C14H10), the agreement is very good, about 3%.
ISSN:1600-5767
0021-8898
1600-5767
DOI:10.1107/S0021889896014501