Stereolithography build time estimation based on volumetric calculations

Purpose - Not all the inventors and designers have access to computer-aided design (CAD) software to transform their design or invention into a 3D solid model. Therefore, they cannot submit an STL file to a rapid prototyping (RP) service bureau for a quotation but perhaps only a 2D sketch or drawing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rapid prototyping journal 2008-09, Vol.14 (5), p.271-279
Main Authors: Campbell, Ian, Combrinck, Jacques, de Beer, Deon, Barnard, Ludrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
CAD
Computer aided design
Cones
Cost analysis
Cost estimates
Design
Geometry
Inventions
Inventors
Lasers
Lithography
Protective coatings
Radiation
Rapid prototyping
Software
Software prototyping
Studies
Three dimensional models
Two dimensional models
Velocity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose - Not all the inventors and designers have access to computer-aided design (CAD) software to transform their design or invention into a 3D solid model. Therefore, they cannot submit an STL file to a rapid prototyping (RP) service bureau for a quotation but perhaps only a 2D sketch or drawing. This paper proposes an alternative approach to build time estimation that will enable cost quotations to be issued before 3D CAD has been used.Design methodology approach - The study presents a method of calculating build time estimations within a target error limit of 10 per cent of the actual build time of a prototype. This is achieved by using basic volumetric shapes, such as cylinders and cones, added together to represent the model in the 2D sketch. By using this information the build time of the product is then calculated with the aid of models created in a mathematical solving software package.Findings - The development of the build time estimator and its application to several build platforms are described together with an analysis of its performance in comparison with the benchmark software. The estimator was found to meet its target 10 per cent error limit in 80 per cent of the stereolithography builds that were analysed.Research limitations implications - The estimator method was not able to handle multi-component complex parts builds in a timely manner. There is a trade-off between accuracy and processing time.Practical implications - The output from the estimator can be fed directly into cost quotations to be sent to RP bureau customers at a very early stage in the design process.Originality value - Unlike all the other build estimators that were encountered, this method works directly from a 2D sketch or drawing rather than a 3D CAD file.
ISSN:1355-2546
1758-7670
DOI:10.1108/13552540810907938