Loading…

Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading

PurposeThis study developed two presentation modes of scientific articles and evaluated their usability with user experiments.Design/methodology/approachTwo presentation modes of scientific articles, simply referred to as “genre presentation mode” and “argument presentation mode”, were constructed b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aslib journal of information management 2023-11, Vol.75 (6), p.985-1007
Main Authors: Niu, Lihui, Ou, Shiyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-517b5a574f2460f6d1ce0d45fb9953bd2c26119873bc31e34a18c1f72deeffe43
container_end_page 1007
container_issue 6
container_start_page 985
container_title Aslib journal of information management
container_volume 75
creator Niu, Lihui
Ou, Shiyan
description PurposeThis study developed two presentation modes of scientific articles and evaluated their usability with user experiments.Design/methodology/approachTwo presentation modes of scientific articles, simply referred to as “genre presentation mode” and “argument presentation mode”, were constructed based on their genre structure and argument structure respectively. Their usability was evaluated by being compared against the existing RichHTML presentation mode in the experiments using eye-tracking and questionnaire methods.FindingsThe participants who were going to find the specific information of scientific articles rated the genre presentation mode higher than they did with either the argument or the RichHTML presentation mode for effectiveness. In contrast, those who were going to understand the general idea of scientific articles rated both the genre and argument presentation mode higher than they did with the RichHTML mode. In terms of efficiency, the participants took less reading time when the articles of non-native language were presented with the genre mode than they did when the articles were presented with the argument mode. When reading the articles in native language to understand the general idea, the participants took less reading time for the articles presented with the argument mode than they did for the articles presented with the genre mode. In comparison, they took less reading time when the articles were presented with the argument mode if they were going to find specific information. For satisfaction, the genre presentation mode was more popular than the argument mode and the RichHTML mode. However, the participants were less satisfied with the argument presentation mode than the other two when reading in native language and intending to find specific information.Originality/valueThe two presentation modes of scientific articles are found to improve the accuracy of information acquisition, shorten the total reading time and be more acceptable by readers.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_04_2022_0207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894316048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-517b5a574f2460f6d1ce0d45fb9953bd2c26119873bc31e34a18c1f72deeffe43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsGh_gLeA5-jsV7I5luJHpeLFXl02m1nZkmTrbmrpvzehXgRPA8-87ww8hNxQuKMU1P3iZfWag8gZMJYDg_KMzGgpVc5Loc7JjIGEnCsoLsk8pS0AUEa5rIoZ-dgkU_vWD8cMv027N4MPfRZcNhxC1uMh20VM2A8n3oUG07RN1o_QO28zEwdv2xG7EDNjTYPdSCOaxvef1-TCmTbh_Hdekc3jw_vyOV-_Pa2Wi3VuWVEMuaRlLY0shWOiAFc01CI0Qrq6qiSvGzbGKK1UyWvLKXJhqLLUlaxBdA4FvyK3p7u7GL72mAa9DfvYjy81U5XgtAChxhQ9pWwMKUV0ehd9Z-JRU9CTST2Z1CD0ZFJPJscOnDrYYTRt82_lj3z-Aya5dWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894316048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Niu, Lihui ; Ou, Shiyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Niu, Lihui ; Ou, Shiyan</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis study developed two presentation modes of scientific articles and evaluated their usability with user experiments.Design/methodology/approachTwo presentation modes of scientific articles, simply referred to as “genre presentation mode” and “argument presentation mode”, were constructed based on their genre structure and argument structure respectively. Their usability was evaluated by being compared against the existing RichHTML presentation mode in the experiments using eye-tracking and questionnaire methods.FindingsThe participants who were going to find the specific information of scientific articles rated the genre presentation mode higher than they did with either the argument or the RichHTML presentation mode for effectiveness. In contrast, those who were going to understand the general idea of scientific articles rated both the genre and argument presentation mode higher than they did with the RichHTML mode. In terms of efficiency, the participants took less reading time when the articles of non-native language were presented with the genre mode than they did when the articles were presented with the argument mode. When reading the articles in native language to understand the general idea, the participants took less reading time for the articles presented with the argument mode than they did for the articles presented with the genre mode. In comparison, they took less reading time when the articles were presented with the argument mode if they were going to find specific information. For satisfaction, the genre presentation mode was more popular than the argument mode and the RichHTML mode. However, the participants were less satisfied with the argument presentation mode than the other two when reading in native language and intending to find specific information.Originality/valueThe two presentation modes of scientific articles are found to improve the accuracy of information acquisition, shorten the total reading time and be more acceptable by readers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-3748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Communication ; Data processing ; Eye movements ; Genre ; Information systems ; Medical research ; Reading ; Researchers ; Scholarly publishing ; Sociology ; Usability ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Aslib journal of information management, 2023-11, Vol.75 (6), p.985-1007</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-517b5a574f2460f6d1ce0d45fb9953bd2c26119873bc31e34a18c1f72deeffe43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0409-7703 ; 0000-0001-8617-6987</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27305,27924,27925,34135</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niu, Lihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Shiyan</creatorcontrib><title>Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading</title><title>Aslib journal of information management</title><description>PurposeThis study developed two presentation modes of scientific articles and evaluated their usability with user experiments.Design/methodology/approachTwo presentation modes of scientific articles, simply referred to as “genre presentation mode” and “argument presentation mode”, were constructed based on their genre structure and argument structure respectively. Their usability was evaluated by being compared against the existing RichHTML presentation mode in the experiments using eye-tracking and questionnaire methods.FindingsThe participants who were going to find the specific information of scientific articles rated the genre presentation mode higher than they did with either the argument or the RichHTML presentation mode for effectiveness. In contrast, those who were going to understand the general idea of scientific articles rated both the genre and argument presentation mode higher than they did with the RichHTML mode. In terms of efficiency, the participants took less reading time when the articles of non-native language were presented with the genre mode than they did when the articles were presented with the argument mode. When reading the articles in native language to understand the general idea, the participants took less reading time for the articles presented with the argument mode than they did for the articles presented with the genre mode. In comparison, they took less reading time when the articles were presented with the argument mode if they were going to find specific information. For satisfaction, the genre presentation mode was more popular than the argument mode and the RichHTML mode. However, the participants were less satisfied with the argument presentation mode than the other two when reading in native language and intending to find specific information.Originality/valueThe two presentation modes of scientific articles are found to improve the accuracy of information acquisition, shorten the total reading time and be more acceptable by readers.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>2050-3806</issn><issn>1758-3748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsGh_gLeA5-jsV7I5luJHpeLFXl02m1nZkmTrbmrpvzehXgRPA8-87ww8hNxQuKMU1P3iZfWag8gZMJYDg_KMzGgpVc5Loc7JjIGEnCsoLsk8pS0AUEa5rIoZ-dgkU_vWD8cMv027N4MPfRZcNhxC1uMh20VM2A8n3oUG07RN1o_QO28zEwdv2xG7EDNjTYPdSCOaxvef1-TCmTbh_Hdekc3jw_vyOV-_Pa2Wi3VuWVEMuaRlLY0shWOiAFc01CI0Qrq6qiSvGzbGKK1UyWvLKXJhqLLUlaxBdA4FvyK3p7u7GL72mAa9DfvYjy81U5XgtAChxhQ9pWwMKUV0ehd9Z-JRU9CTST2Z1CD0ZFJPJscOnDrYYTRt82_lj3z-Aya5dWw</recordid><startdate>20231129</startdate><enddate>20231129</enddate><creator>Niu, Lihui</creator><creator>Ou, Shiyan</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-7703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-6987</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231129</creationdate><title>Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading</title><author>Niu, Lihui ; Ou, Shiyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-517b5a574f2460f6d1ce0d45fb9953bd2c26119873bc31e34a18c1f72deeffe43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niu, Lihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Shiyan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aslib journal of information management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niu, Lihui</au><au>Ou, Shiyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading</atitle><jtitle>Aslib journal of information management</jtitle><date>2023-11-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1007</epage><pages>985-1007</pages><issn>2050-3806</issn><eissn>1758-3748</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis study developed two presentation modes of scientific articles and evaluated their usability with user experiments.Design/methodology/approachTwo presentation modes of scientific articles, simply referred to as “genre presentation mode” and “argument presentation mode”, were constructed based on their genre structure and argument structure respectively. Their usability was evaluated by being compared against the existing RichHTML presentation mode in the experiments using eye-tracking and questionnaire methods.FindingsThe participants who were going to find the specific information of scientific articles rated the genre presentation mode higher than they did with either the argument or the RichHTML presentation mode for effectiveness. In contrast, those who were going to understand the general idea of scientific articles rated both the genre and argument presentation mode higher than they did with the RichHTML mode. In terms of efficiency, the participants took less reading time when the articles of non-native language were presented with the genre mode than they did when the articles were presented with the argument mode. When reading the articles in native language to understand the general idea, the participants took less reading time for the articles presented with the argument mode than they did for the articles presented with the genre mode. In comparison, they took less reading time when the articles were presented with the argument mode if they were going to find specific information. For satisfaction, the genre presentation mode was more popular than the argument mode and the RichHTML mode. However, the participants were less satisfied with the argument presentation mode than the other two when reading in native language and intending to find specific information.Originality/valueThe two presentation modes of scientific articles are found to improve the accuracy of information acquisition, shorten the total reading time and be more acceptable by readers.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-7703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-6987</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-3806
ispartof Aslib journal of information management, 2023-11, Vol.75 (6), p.985-1007
issn 2050-3806
1758-3748
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_04_2022_0207
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Communication
Data processing
Eye movements
Genre
Information systems
Medical research
Reading
Researchers
Scholarly publishing
Sociology
Usability
Writing
title Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic reading
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A23%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability%20evaluation%20of%20two%20new%20presentation%20modes%20of%20scientific%20articles%20for%20academic%20reading&rft.jtitle=Aslib%20journal%20of%20information%20management&rft.au=Niu,%20Lihui&rft.date=2023-11-29&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1007&rft.pages=985-1007&rft.issn=2050-3806&rft.eissn=1758-3748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894316048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-517b5a574f2460f6d1ce0d45fb9953bd2c26119873bc31e34a18c1f72deeffe43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894316048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true