Loading…
A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness
PurposeWhen it comes to tactics that organizational communicators can undertake to elicit positive gains with stakeholders, transparent communication ranks high on lists proposed by both the scholarly and trade literatures. However, little is known about why such communication tactics are effective...
Saved in:
Published in: | Corporate communications 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.403-419 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053 |
container_end_page | 419 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Corporate communications |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Hopp, Toby Fisher, Jolene |
description | PurposeWhen it comes to tactics that organizational communicators can undertake to elicit positive gains with stakeholders, transparent communication ranks high on lists proposed by both the scholarly and trade literatures. However, little is known about why such communication tactics are effective on a psychological level. Thus, this study aims to propose and test a psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness in the context of proactive, socially responsible brand communication. The model was based on three propositions: (1) transparent communication offers audiences an important opportunity to learn more about organizational functioning, (2) learning elicits an organizationally relevant positive affective state and (3) positive affect facilitates a robust relationship between perceived learning outcomes and positive evaluation of the organization.Design/methodology/approachThis study used an experiment to test the hypothesized model.FindingsSupport was found for the proposed model. Specifically, the data indicated that the use of transparent massaging elicited higher levels of perceived learning. Perceived learning was associated with positive brand-relevant affect. Finally, positive brand relevant-affect predicted positive summary brand evaluation.Originality/valueTaken as a whole, the current findings inform theorizing on transparent organizational and brand communication by describing the foundational roles played by perceived knowledge gain and positive affect in encouraging positive message-related outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_CCIJ_01_2020_0009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534570568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fz9FJkzTJzaX4sbLgRc8hTRPt0jY1aYX997asF8HTvDDPOwMPQtcEbgkBeVeW2xcMBOeQAwYAdYJWRHCJC2DF6ZwpLzDNpTpHFyntZ0IoolbofpMN6WA_Qxs-GmvarAu1a7PgszGaPg0mun7MbOi6qZ_3YxP6zHnv7Nh8u96ldInOvGmTu_qda_T--PBWPuPd69O23OywpYSNmPHKWGqMoF6JOpes8MQJKahwvqJAFWcSjOeG59IbVRdcitr4SjCogQCna3RzvDvE8DW5NOp9mGI_v9Q5p4wL4IWcKXKkbAwpRef1EJvOxIMmoBdRehGlgehFlF5EzR04dlznomnrfyt_3NIfmchpew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534570568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><creator>Hopp, Toby ; Fisher, Jolene</creator><creatorcontrib>Hopp, Toby ; Fisher, Jolene</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeWhen it comes to tactics that organizational communicators can undertake to elicit positive gains with stakeholders, transparent communication ranks high on lists proposed by both the scholarly and trade literatures. However, little is known about why such communication tactics are effective on a psychological level. Thus, this study aims to propose and test a psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness in the context of proactive, socially responsible brand communication. The model was based on three propositions: (1) transparent communication offers audiences an important opportunity to learn more about organizational functioning, (2) learning elicits an organizationally relevant positive affective state and (3) positive affect facilitates a robust relationship between perceived learning outcomes and positive evaluation of the organization.Design/methodology/approachThis study used an experiment to test the hypothesized model.FindingsSupport was found for the proposed model. Specifically, the data indicated that the use of transparent massaging elicited higher levels of perceived learning. Perceived learning was associated with positive brand-relevant affect. Finally, positive brand relevant-affect predicted positive summary brand evaluation.Originality/valueTaken as a whole, the current findings inform theorizing on transparent organizational and brand communication by describing the foundational roles played by perceived knowledge gain and positive affect in encouraging positive message-related outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-3289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business communications ; Communication ; Decision making ; Learning ; Massaging ; Model testing ; Participation ; Public relations ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Tactics ; Transparency ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Corporate communications, 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.403-419</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534570568/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534570568?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21381,21394,27924,27925,33611,33906,36060,43733,43892,44363,74221,74409,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hopp, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jolene</creatorcontrib><title>A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness</title><title>Corporate communications</title><description>PurposeWhen it comes to tactics that organizational communicators can undertake to elicit positive gains with stakeholders, transparent communication ranks high on lists proposed by both the scholarly and trade literatures. However, little is known about why such communication tactics are effective on a psychological level. Thus, this study aims to propose and test a psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness in the context of proactive, socially responsible brand communication. The model was based on three propositions: (1) transparent communication offers audiences an important opportunity to learn more about organizational functioning, (2) learning elicits an organizationally relevant positive affective state and (3) positive affect facilitates a robust relationship between perceived learning outcomes and positive evaluation of the organization.Design/methodology/approachThis study used an experiment to test the hypothesized model.FindingsSupport was found for the proposed model. Specifically, the data indicated that the use of transparent massaging elicited higher levels of perceived learning. Perceived learning was associated with positive brand-relevant affect. Finally, positive brand relevant-affect predicted positive summary brand evaluation.Originality/valueTaken as a whole, the current findings inform theorizing on transparent organizational and brand communication by describing the foundational roles played by perceived knowledge gain and positive affect in encouraging positive message-related outcomes.</description><subject>Business communications</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Massaging</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1356-3289</issn><issn>1758-6046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fz9FJkzTJzaX4sbLgRc8hTRPt0jY1aYX997asF8HTvDDPOwMPQtcEbgkBeVeW2xcMBOeQAwYAdYJWRHCJC2DF6ZwpLzDNpTpHFyntZ0IoolbofpMN6WA_Qxs-GmvarAu1a7PgszGaPg0mun7MbOi6qZ_3YxP6zHnv7Nh8u96ldInOvGmTu_qda_T--PBWPuPd69O23OywpYSNmPHKWGqMoF6JOpes8MQJKahwvqJAFWcSjOeG59IbVRdcitr4SjCogQCna3RzvDvE8DW5NOp9mGI_v9Q5p4wL4IWcKXKkbAwpRef1EJvOxIMmoBdRehGlgehFlF5EzR04dlznomnrfyt_3NIfmchpew</recordid><startdate>20210225</startdate><enddate>20210225</enddate><creator>Hopp, Toby</creator><creator>Fisher, Jolene</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210225</creationdate><title>A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness</title><author>Hopp, Toby ; Fisher, Jolene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Business communications</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Massaging</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hopp, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jolene</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hopp, Toby</au><au>Fisher, Jolene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle><date>2021-02-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>403-419</pages><issn>1356-3289</issn><eissn>1758-6046</eissn><abstract>PurposeWhen it comes to tactics that organizational communicators can undertake to elicit positive gains with stakeholders, transparent communication ranks high on lists proposed by both the scholarly and trade literatures. However, little is known about why such communication tactics are effective on a psychological level. Thus, this study aims to propose and test a psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness in the context of proactive, socially responsible brand communication. The model was based on three propositions: (1) transparent communication offers audiences an important opportunity to learn more about organizational functioning, (2) learning elicits an organizationally relevant positive affective state and (3) positive affect facilitates a robust relationship between perceived learning outcomes and positive evaluation of the organization.Design/methodology/approachThis study used an experiment to test the hypothesized model.FindingsSupport was found for the proposed model. Specifically, the data indicated that the use of transparent massaging elicited higher levels of perceived learning. Perceived learning was associated with positive brand-relevant affect. Finally, positive brand relevant-affect predicted positive summary brand evaluation.Originality/valueTaken as a whole, the current findings inform theorizing on transparent organizational and brand communication by describing the foundational roles played by perceived knowledge gain and positive affect in encouraging positive message-related outcomes.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0009</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-3289 |
ispartof | Corporate communications, 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.403-419 |
issn | 1356-3289 1758-6046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_CCIJ_01_2020_0009 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection |
subjects | Business communications Communication Decision making Learning Massaging Model testing Participation Public relations Social responsibility Stakeholders Tactics Transparency Trust |
title | A psychological model of transparent communication effectiveness |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A15%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20psychological%20model%20of%20transparent%20communication%20effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20communications&rft.au=Hopp,%20Toby&rft.date=2021-02-25&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=403-419&rft.issn=1356-3289&rft.eissn=1758-6046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2534570568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-45bac3aa73f97d2846f1e78737efb30395480af5a528fa9d6587dafb740d01053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534570568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |